A Retrospective Study of Pediatric Allergic Contact Dermatitis from 2017-2022

被引:0
|
作者
Pixley, Jessica N. [1 ]
Kontzias, Christina [1 ]
Tao, Rachel E. [1 ]
Massey, Lauren [2 ]
Mcpeeks, Kimberly [1 ]
Neighbors, Katherine [2 ]
Srivastava, Radhika [1 ]
Feldman, Steven R. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Burkhart, Craig [2 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, 4618 Country Club Rd, Winston Salem, NC 27104 USA
[2] Burkhart Pediat & Adolescent Dermatol, Cary, NC USA
[3] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Winston Salem, NC 27104 USA
[4] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Social Sci & Hlth Policy, Winston Salem, NC 27104 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Dermatology; Pediatrics; Allergic contact dermatitis; SERIES;
D O I
10.1007/s13555-024-01314-w
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
ObjectivesAllergic contact dermatitis occurs frequently in children. The proportion of children of color in the US is increasing, and racial and ethnic minority representation is important in pediatric allergic contact dermatitis research. The objectives of our study were to identify differences in age, sex, race and ethnicity among pediatric patch tests obtained from 2017 to 2022.MethodsA total of 792 pediatric patients were evaluated, and patch test differences were analyzed among age, sex, race and ethnicity groups.ResultsChildren in the age group 0-5 years had the highest number of positive reactions, and propolis was the most frequent allergen among females and in children in the age groups 6-11 years and 12-18 years. Carmine was the most frequent allergen among males and among children in the age group 1-5 years. Risk of sensitivity to multiple allergens varied with race and ethnicity.ConclusionsThe risk of patch test positivity to multiple allergens varied within the demographic groups evaluated. The etiology of these differences is likely multi-factorial and includes differences in exposure patterns and disparities in access.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 452
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Allergic contact dermatitis from calcipotriol
    Park, YK
    Lee, JH
    Chung, WG
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2002, 82 (01) : 71 - 72
  • [32] Allergic contact dermatitis from tromantadine
    Jauregui, I
    Urrutia, I
    Gamboa, PM
    Antepara, I
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY & CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1997, 7 (04): : 260 - 261
  • [33] Allergic contact dermatitis from gold
    Wiesner, M
    Pambor, M
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1998, 38 (01) : 52 - 53
  • [34] Allergic contact dermatitis from pyoctanin
    Schoppelrey, HP
    Mily, H
    Agathos, M
    Breit, R
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1997, 36 (04) : 221 - 224
  • [35] Allergic contact dermatitis from apomorphine
    Carboni, GP
    Contri, P
    Davalli, R
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1997, 36 (03) : 177 - 178
  • [36] Allergic contact dermatitis from propolis
    Walgrave, SE
    Warshaw, EM
    Glesne, LA
    DERMATITIS, 2005, 16 (04) : 209 - 215
  • [37] Allergic contact dermatitis from luliconazole
    Shono, Mamiko
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2007, 56 (05) : 296 - U13
  • [38] Allergic contact dermatitis from ophthalmics
    Zheng, Yue
    Chaudhari, Paru R.
    Maibach, Howard I.
    CUTANEOUS AND OCULAR TOXICOLOGY, 2017, 36 (04) : 317 - 320
  • [39] Allergic contact dermatitis from apraclonidine
    Armisen, M
    Vidal, C
    Quintans, R
    Suarez, A
    Castroviejo, M
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1998, 39 (04) : 193 - 193
  • [40] Allergic contact dermatitis from cyclopentolate
    Camarasa, JG
    Pla, C
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1996, 35 (06) : 368 - 369