A Retrospective Study of Pediatric Allergic Contact Dermatitis from 2017-2022

被引:0
|
作者
Pixley, Jessica N. [1 ]
Kontzias, Christina [1 ]
Tao, Rachel E. [1 ]
Massey, Lauren [2 ]
Mcpeeks, Kimberly [1 ]
Neighbors, Katherine [2 ]
Srivastava, Radhika [1 ]
Feldman, Steven R. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Burkhart, Craig [2 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, 4618 Country Club Rd, Winston Salem, NC 27104 USA
[2] Burkhart Pediat & Adolescent Dermatol, Cary, NC USA
[3] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Winston Salem, NC 27104 USA
[4] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Social Sci & Hlth Policy, Winston Salem, NC 27104 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Dermatology; Pediatrics; Allergic contact dermatitis; SERIES;
D O I
10.1007/s13555-024-01314-w
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
ObjectivesAllergic contact dermatitis occurs frequently in children. The proportion of children of color in the US is increasing, and racial and ethnic minority representation is important in pediatric allergic contact dermatitis research. The objectives of our study were to identify differences in age, sex, race and ethnicity among pediatric patch tests obtained from 2017 to 2022.MethodsA total of 792 pediatric patients were evaluated, and patch test differences were analyzed among age, sex, race and ethnicity groups.ResultsChildren in the age group 0-5 years had the highest number of positive reactions, and propolis was the most frequent allergen among females and in children in the age groups 6-11 years and 12-18 years. Carmine was the most frequent allergen among males and among children in the age group 1-5 years. Risk of sensitivity to multiple allergens varied with race and ethnicity.ConclusionsThe risk of patch test positivity to multiple allergens varied within the demographic groups evaluated. The etiology of these differences is likely multi-factorial and includes differences in exposure patterns and disparities in access.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 452
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pediatric "pet consort dermatitis"-Allergic contact dermatitis from transfer of bronopol from a pet cat
    Hamann, Dathan
    Ridpath, Alyson
    Faith, Esteban Fernandez
    PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 35 (05) : E332 - E333
  • [22] A retrospective review of dupilumab for atopic dermatitis patients with allergic contact dermatitis
    Chipalkatti, Naina
    Lee, Nicole
    Zancanaro, Pedro
    Dumont, Nicole
    Kachuk, Courtney
    Rosmarin, David
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 80 (04) : 1166 - 1167
  • [23] Pediatric Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Lessons for Better Care
    不详
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2015, 3 (05): : 668 - 668
  • [24] Pediatric Contact Dermatitis: A 10-Year Multicenter Retrospective Study
    Slodownik, Dan
    Bar, Jonathan
    Solomon, Michal
    Lavy, Yaron
    Baum, Sharon
    Mordechai Galed, Orel
    Cnaan, Roten
    Solomon-Cohen, Efrat
    Horev, Liran
    Daniely, Danny
    DERMATITIS, 2023, : 399 - 404
  • [25] Allergic contact dermatitis to cosmetics: retrospective analysis of a population subjected to patch tests between 2004 and 2017
    Silva Hafner, Mariana de Figueiredo
    Rodrigues, Ana Carolina
    Lazzarini, Rosana
    ANAIS BRASILEIROS DE DERMATOLOGIA, 2020, 95 (06) : 696 - 701
  • [26] Allergic contact dermatitis from grasses
    Koh, D
    Goh, CL
    Tan, HTW
    Ng, SK
    Wong, WK
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1997, 37 (01) : 32 - 34
  • [27] Allergic contact dermatitis from lanoconazole
    Nakano, R
    Miyoshi, H
    Kanzaki, T
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1996, 35 (01) : 63 - 63
  • [28] Allergic contact dermatitis from enoxolone
    Tanaka, S
    Otsuki, T
    Matsumoto, Y
    Hayakawa, R
    Sugiura, M
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2001, 44 (03) : 192 - 192
  • [29] CONTACT ALLERGIC DERMATITIS FROM OATMEAL
    RIBOLDI, A
    PIGATTO, PD
    ALTOMARE, GF
    GIBELLI, E
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1988, 18 (05) : 316 - 317
  • [30] Allergic contact dermatitis from myrrh
    Gallo, R
    Rivara, G
    Cattarini, G
    Cozzani, E
    Guarrera, M
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1999, 41 (04) : 230 - 231