Comparison between 2D and 3D numerical analysis for seismic response of Xiluodu underground caverns

被引：0
|
作者：
Lu, Tao [1 ]
Li, Hai-Bo [1 ]
Yang, Jian-Hong [2 ]
Zhou, Qing-Chun [1 ]
Li, Jun-Ru [1 ]
机构：
[1] Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Acad. of Sci., Wuhan 430071, China
[2] Chengdu Hydroelectric Investigation and Design Institute of SPC, Chengdu 610072, China
来源：
Yantu Lixue/Rock and Soil Mechanics | 2009年 / 30卷 / 03期
关键词：
Finite difference method - Caves - Seismic waves - Earthquakes - Numerical methods;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：721 / 728
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between the seismic response of 2D and 3D models of rigid blocks
    Di Egidio, Angelo
    Zulli, Daniele
    Contento, Alessandro
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION, 2014, 13 (01) : 151 - 162
  • [2] Comparison between the seismic response of 2D and 3D models of rigid blocks
    Angelo Di Egidio
    Daniele Zulli
    Alessandro Contento
    [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2014, 13 (01) : 151 - 162
  • [3] Comparison between the seismic response of 2D and 3D models of rigid blocks
    Angelo Di Egidio
    Daniele Zulli
    Alessandro Contento
    [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2014, 13 : 151 - 162
  • [4] Equivalence between 2D and 3D numerical simulations of the seismic response of improved sites
    Papadimitriou, A. G.
    Bouckovalas, G. D.
    Vytiniotis, A. C.
    Bakas, G. J.
    [J]. Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, : 809 - 815
  • [5] Influence of 3D spatial effect of underground structure on the nonlinear seismic response of subway station based on the comparison of 2D and 3D models
    Jin, Liguo
    Du, Liting
    Zhou, Wen
    Chen, Su
    Zhou, Zhenghua
    Zhou, Bengang
    [J]. TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 139
  • [6] Seismic Analysis of the Reef-seawater System: Comparison between 3D and 2D Models
    Bao, Xin
    Liu, Jingbo
    Chen, Su
    Wang, Piguang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2022, 26 (06) : 3109 - 3122
  • [7] Comparison between 2D and 3D numerical modeling of superplastic forming processes
    Hambli, R
    Potiron, A
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2001, 190 (37-38) : 4871 - 4880
  • [8] Comparison between 3D and 2D Cephalometric Analyses
    Bholsithi, W.
    Sinthanayothin, C.
    Chintakanon, K.
    Komolpis, R.
    Tharanon, W.
    [J]. 4TH KUALA LUMPUR INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2008, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, 21 (1-2): : 540 - +
  • [9] COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D MODELS OF SALINITY NUMERICAL SIMULATION
    Li Chunhui
    Pan Xishan
    Ke Jie
    Dong Xiaotian
    [J]. POLISH MARITIME RESEARCH, 2015, 22 : 26 - 29
  • [10] Comparison between 2D and 3D numerical modelling of a hot forging simulative test
    Croin, M.
    Ghiotti, A.
    Bruschi, S.
    [J]. 10TH ESAFORM CONFERENCE ON MATERIAL FORMING, PTS A AND B, 2007, 907 : 499 - +
12345