Comparison between 2D and 3D numerical modelling of a hot forging simulative test

被引:0
|
作者
Croin, M. [1 ]
Ghiotti, A. [1 ]
Bruschi, S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, DIMEG, Via Venezia 1, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Trent, DIMS, I-38050 Trento, Italy
关键词
hot forging; FEM; heat transfer;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The paper presents the comparative analysis between 21D and 31D modelling of a simulative experiment performed in laboratory environment, in which operating conditions approximate hot forging of a turbine aerofoil section. The plane strain deformation was chosen as an ideal case to analyze the process because of the thickness variations in the final section and the consequent distributions of contact pressure and sliding velocity at the interface that are closed to the conditions of the real industrial process. In order to compare the performances of 21D and 31D approaches, two different analyses were performed and compared with the experiments in terms of loads and temperatures peaks at the interface between the dies and the workpiece.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between 2D and 3D numerical modeling of superplastic forming processes
    Hambli, R
    Potiron, A
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2001, 190 (37-38) : 4871 - 4880
  • [2] 2D and 3D discrete numerical modelling of soil arching
    Ning Bao
    Jing Wei
    Jian-feng Chen
    Ping Wei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE A, 2020, 21 (05): : 350 - 365
  • [3] Comparison between 3D and 2D Cephalometric Analyses
    Bholsithi, W.
    Sinthanayothin, C.
    Chintakanon, K.
    Komolpis, R.
    Tharanon, W.
    [J]. 4TH KUALA LUMPUR INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2008, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, 21 (1-2): : 540 - +
  • [4] COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D MODELS OF SALINITY NUMERICAL SIMULATION
    Li Chunhui
    Pan Xishan
    Ke Jie
    Dong Xiaotian
    [J]. POLISH MARITIME RESEARCH, 2015, 22 : 26 - 29
  • [5] Mechanical Modelling of Pultrusion Process: 2D and 3D Numerical Approaches
    Baran, Ismet
    Hattel, Jesper H.
    Akkerman, Remko
    Tutum, Cem C.
    [J]. APPLIED COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 2015, 22 (01) : 99 - 118
  • [6] Mechanical Modelling of Pultrusion Process: 2D and 3D Numerical Approaches
    Ismet Baran
    Jesper H. Hattel
    Remko Akkerman
    Cem C. Tutum
    [J]. Applied Composite Materials, 2015, 22 : 99 - 118
  • [7] Numerical study of the Brazilian tensile test: 2D and 3D simulations
    Qiao L.
    Liu J.
    Li Q.-W.
    Zhao G.-Y.
    [J]. Gongcheng Kexue Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2022, 44 (01): : 131 - 142
  • [8] Comparison Between 2D and 3D Modelling of Induction Machine Using Finite Element Method
    Ferkova, Zelmira
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2015, 13 (02) : 120 - 126
  • [9] Comparison between 2D and 3D numerical analysis for seismic response of Xiluodu underground caverns
    Lu, Tao
    Li, Hai-Bo
    Yang, Jian-Hong
    Zhou, Qing-Chun
    Li, Jun-Ru
    [J]. Yantu Lixue/Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30 (03): : 721 - 728
  • [10] A comparison of 2D and 3D numerical simulations of tunnelling in soft soils
    Ngoc Anh Do
    Daniel Dias
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2017, 76