Comparing IDREAM as an iterative reconstruction algorithm against in filtered back projection in computed tomography

被引:0
|
作者
Maamoun I.K.A.F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Medical Physics Department Department, Kundiawa Genera Hospital, Kundiawa, Papua New Guinea Kundiawa
来源
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics | 2020年 / 17卷 / 03期
关键词
Computed tomography; FBP; IDREAM; Image noise; Image quality; Iterative algorithm SNR;
D O I
10.22038/ijmp.2019.41872.1613
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Recent studies of Computed Tomography (CT) conducted on patient dose reduction have recommended using an iterative reconstruction algorithm and mA (mili-Ampere) dose modulation. The current study aimed to evaluate Iterative Dose Reduction Algorithm (IDREAM) as an iterative reconstruction algorithm. Material and Methods: Two CT protocols (i.e., A: 120 KV /150 mA, FBP; B: 120KV/ (20-150) mAs, IDREAM) to scan water and acrylic phantoms. A number of 40 patients were assigned to two CT protocols (C: n=20, 120KV/160 ±10 mAs, FBP and D: n=20, 120 KV/ (30-150 mAs, IDREAM), the two groups (C and D) were then referred to abdomen and pelvis CT scan (Sinovision, insitum 16) with contrast. Image quality parameters, dose calculations were measured for all groups (i.e., A, B, C, and D). Results: Group B had a highly significant SNR with less significant noise (P<0.05), in comparison with group A. In addition, uniformity was markedly higher for group B (P<0.05) in water phantom and insignificantly different (P>0.05) in acrylic phantom, as compared to group A. CTDIvol (A: 13.94 mGy; B: 6.91 mGy, P<0.05) and DLP (A:501.76 mGy. cm; B:248.88 mGy. cm). Noise and SNR were significantly different (P<0.05) in group D against C. CTDIvol (C: 30.3±5.2 mGy; D: 15.4 ±2.7 mGy, P<0.05), DLP (C:544±100 mGy. cm; D:272.3±50.3 mGy. cm, P<0.05) and the effective dose (C:8.1±1.5 mSv; D:4.08±0.75 mSv, P<0.05) Conclusion: The results of the present study were indicative of the feasibility of IDREAMas an iterative reconstruction algorithm. © 2020, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 174
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A reconstruction algorithm for coherent scatter computed tomography based on filtered back-projection
    van Stevendaal, U
    Schlomka, JP
    Harding, A
    Grass, M
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (09) : 2465 - 2474
  • [2] Comparing Fourth Generation Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique to Standard Filtered Back Projection in Pediatric Head Computed Tomography Examinations
    Thomas, Anna Kalathil
    Southard, Richard
    Curran, John
    Augustyn, Robyn
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2018, 42 (03) : 475 - 481
  • [3] Parallelization of filtered back-projection algorithm for computed tomography
    Boukhamla, Akram
    Merouani, Hayet Farida
    Sissaoui, Hocine
    EVOLVING SYSTEMS, 2016, 7 (03) : 197 - 205
  • [4] Detection of Pulmonary Embolism on Computed Tomography Improvement Using a Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm Compared With Filtered Back Projection and Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms
    Kligerman, Seth
    Lahiji, Kian
    Weihe, Elizabeth
    Lin, Cheng Tin
    Terpenning, Silanath
    Jeudy, Jean
    Frazier, Annie
    Pugatch, Robert
    Galvin, Jeffrey R.
    Mittal, Deepika
    Kothari, Kunal
    White, Charles S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2015, 30 (01) : 60 - 68
  • [5] Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction in coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection
    Cha, Min Jae
    Seo, Jae Seung
    Yoo, Dong Soo
    Chong, Semin
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2018, 59 (03) : 280 - 286
  • [6] Weighted Filtered Back-Projection for Source Translation Computed Tomography Reconstruction
    Chen, Jie
    Yu, Haijun
    Ni, Song
    Liu, Chuanjiang
    Ge, Wenjie
    Huang, Yixing
    Liu, Fenglin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2023, 72
  • [7] Effects of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Low-Dose Paranasal Computed Tomography: A Comparison with Filtered Back Projection and Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction
    Tomita, Hayato
    Kuramochi, Kenji
    Fujikawa, Atsuko
    Ikeda, Hirotaka
    Komita, Midori
    Kurihara, Yoshiko
    Kobayashi, Yasuyuki
    Mimura, Hidefumi
    ACTA MEDICA OKAYAMA, 2022, 76 (05) : 511 - 517
  • [8] Comparison of image quality from filtered back projection, statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms in abdominal computed tomography
    Kuo, Yu
    Lin, Yi-Yang
    Lee, Rheun-Chuan
    Lin, Chung-Jung
    Chiou, Yi-You
    Guo, Wan-Yuo
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (31)
  • [9] ADAPTIVE FILTERED-BACK-PROJECTION FOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
    Shtok, Joseph
    Elad, Michael
    Zibulevsky, Michael
    2008 IEEE 25TH CONVENTION OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS IN ISRAEL, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 518 - 522
  • [10] Filtered back-projection reconstruction technique for coherent-scatter computed tomography
    van Stevendaal, U
    Schlomka, JP
    Grass, M
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2003: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2003, 5032 : 1810 - 1819