Comparing IDREAM as an iterative reconstruction algorithm against in filtered back projection in computed tomography

被引:0
|
作者
Maamoun I.K.A.F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Medical Physics Department Department, Kundiawa Genera Hospital, Kundiawa, Papua New Guinea Kundiawa
来源
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics | 2020年 / 17卷 / 03期
关键词
Computed tomography; FBP; IDREAM; Image noise; Image quality; Iterative algorithm SNR;
D O I
10.22038/ijmp.2019.41872.1613
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Recent studies of Computed Tomography (CT) conducted on patient dose reduction have recommended using an iterative reconstruction algorithm and mA (mili-Ampere) dose modulation. The current study aimed to evaluate Iterative Dose Reduction Algorithm (IDREAM) as an iterative reconstruction algorithm. Material and Methods: Two CT protocols (i.e., A: 120 KV /150 mA, FBP; B: 120KV/ (20-150) mAs, IDREAM) to scan water and acrylic phantoms. A number of 40 patients were assigned to two CT protocols (C: n=20, 120KV/160 ±10 mAs, FBP and D: n=20, 120 KV/ (30-150 mAs, IDREAM), the two groups (C and D) were then referred to abdomen and pelvis CT scan (Sinovision, insitum 16) with contrast. Image quality parameters, dose calculations were measured for all groups (i.e., A, B, C, and D). Results: Group B had a highly significant SNR with less significant noise (P<0.05), in comparison with group A. In addition, uniformity was markedly higher for group B (P<0.05) in water phantom and insignificantly different (P>0.05) in acrylic phantom, as compared to group A. CTDIvol (A: 13.94 mGy; B: 6.91 mGy, P<0.05) and DLP (A:501.76 mGy. cm; B:248.88 mGy. cm). Noise and SNR were significantly different (P<0.05) in group D against C. CTDIvol (C: 30.3±5.2 mGy; D: 15.4 ±2.7 mGy, P<0.05), DLP (C:544±100 mGy. cm; D:272.3±50.3 mGy. cm, P<0.05) and the effective dose (C:8.1±1.5 mSv; D:4.08±0.75 mSv, P<0.05) Conclusion: The results of the present study were indicative of the feasibility of IDREAMas an iterative reconstruction algorithm. © 2020, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 174
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Monte Carlo evaluation of the Filtered Back Projection method for image reconstruction in proton computed tomography
    Cirrone, G. A. P.
    Bucciolini, M.
    Bruzzi, M.
    Candiano, G.
    Civinini, C.
    Cuttone, G.
    Guarino, P.
    Lo Presti, D.
    Mazzaglia, S. E.
    Pallotta, S.
    Randazzo, N.
    Sipala, V.
    Stancampiano, C.
    Talamonti, C.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2011, 658 (01): : 78 - 83
  • [22] Comparison between filtered back projection SPECT reconstruction and a new iterative reconstruction algorithm: Preliminary clinical evaluation
    Zoccarato, O.
    Campini, R.
    Marcassa, C.
    Calza, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2007, 34 : S280 - S280
  • [23] Comparison of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection for Detecting Hepatic Metastases on Submillisievert Low-Dose Computed Tomography
    Son, Jung Hee
    Kim, Seung Ho
    Yoon, Jung-Hee
    Lee, Yedaun
    Lim, Yun-Jung
    Kim, Seon-Jeong
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2017, 41 (04) : 644 - 650
  • [24] Submillisievert Chest CT With Filtered Back Projection and Iterative Reconstruction Techniques
    Padole, Atul
    Singh, Sarabjeet
    Ackman, Jeanne B.
    Wu, Carol
    Do, Synho
    Pourjabbar, Sarvenaz
    Khawaja, Ranish Deedar Ali
    Otrakji, Alexi
    Digumarthy, Subba
    Shepard, Jo-Anne
    Kalra, Mannudeep
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 203 (04) : 772 - 781
  • [25] Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 1): evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients
    Pontana, Francois
    Pagniez, Julien
    Flohr, Thomas
    Faivre, Jean-Baptiste
    Duhamel, Alain
    Remy, Jacques
    Remy-Jardin, Martine
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (03) : 627 - 635
  • [26] Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 1): evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients
    François Pontana
    Julien Pagniez
    Thomas Flohr
    Jean-Baptiste Faivre
    Alain Duhamel
    Jacques Remy
    Martine Remy-Jardin
    European Radiology, 2011, 21 : 627 - 635
  • [27] Computed Tomography Angiography for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Comparison of 2 Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Blends to Filtered Back-Projection Alone
    Ridge, Carole A.
    Litmanovich, Diana
    Bukoye, Bolanle A.
    Lin, Pei J.
    Wilcox, Carol
    Boiselle, Phillip M.
    Bankier, Alexander A.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2013, 37 (05) : 712 - 717
  • [28] How Different Iterative and Filtered Back Projection Kernels Affect Computed Tomography Numbers and Low Contrast Detectability
    Volgyes, David
    Pedersen, Marius
    Stray-Pedersen, Arne
    Waaler, Dag
    Martinsen, Anne Catrine Traegde
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2017, 41 (01) : 75 - 81
  • [29] Comparison between filtered back projection SPECT reconstruction and a new iterative reconstruction algorithm: an antropomorphic cardiac phantom study
    Zoccarato, O.
    Campini, R.
    Marcassa, C.
    Calza, P.
    Maugeri, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2007, 34 : S280 - S280
  • [30] Development of a Wood Computed Tomography Imaging System Using a Butterworth Filtered Back-Projection Algorithm
    Qi, Yuhan
    Zhou, Yucheng
    Xu, Jiahe
    Ge, Zhedong
    FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 2018, 68 (02) : 147 - 156