Comparing IDREAM as an iterative reconstruction algorithm against in filtered back projection in computed tomography

被引:0
|
作者
Maamoun I.K.A.F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Medical Physics Department Department, Kundiawa Genera Hospital, Kundiawa, Papua New Guinea Kundiawa
来源
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics | 2020年 / 17卷 / 03期
关键词
Computed tomography; FBP; IDREAM; Image noise; Image quality; Iterative algorithm SNR;
D O I
10.22038/ijmp.2019.41872.1613
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Recent studies of Computed Tomography (CT) conducted on patient dose reduction have recommended using an iterative reconstruction algorithm and mA (mili-Ampere) dose modulation. The current study aimed to evaluate Iterative Dose Reduction Algorithm (IDREAM) as an iterative reconstruction algorithm. Material and Methods: Two CT protocols (i.e., A: 120 KV /150 mA, FBP; B: 120KV/ (20-150) mAs, IDREAM) to scan water and acrylic phantoms. A number of 40 patients were assigned to two CT protocols (C: n=20, 120KV/160 ±10 mAs, FBP and D: n=20, 120 KV/ (30-150 mAs, IDREAM), the two groups (C and D) were then referred to abdomen and pelvis CT scan (Sinovision, insitum 16) with contrast. Image quality parameters, dose calculations were measured for all groups (i.e., A, B, C, and D). Results: Group B had a highly significant SNR with less significant noise (P<0.05), in comparison with group A. In addition, uniformity was markedly higher for group B (P<0.05) in water phantom and insignificantly different (P>0.05) in acrylic phantom, as compared to group A. CTDIvol (A: 13.94 mGy; B: 6.91 mGy, P<0.05) and DLP (A:501.76 mGy. cm; B:248.88 mGy. cm). Noise and SNR were significantly different (P<0.05) in group D against C. CTDIvol (C: 30.3±5.2 mGy; D: 15.4 ±2.7 mGy, P<0.05), DLP (C:544±100 mGy. cm; D:272.3±50.3 mGy. cm, P<0.05) and the effective dose (C:8.1±1.5 mSv; D:4.08±0.75 mSv, P<0.05) Conclusion: The results of the present study were indicative of the feasibility of IDREAMas an iterative reconstruction algorithm. © 2020, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 174
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Space Carving and Filtered Back-Projection as Preconditioners for Proton Computed Tomography Reconstruction
    Schultze, Blake
    Witt, Micah
    Schubert, Keith E.
    Hurley, Robert F.
    Bashkirov, Vladimir
    Schulte, Reinhard W.
    Gomez, Ernesto
    2012 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE RECORD (NSS/MIC), 2012, : 4335 - 4340
  • [12] Image Quality in the Slice-Plane of Half-Reconstructed Computed Tomography in Filtered Back Projection and Iterative Reconstruction Methods
    Tsuda, N.
    Mitsui, K.
    Oda, S.
    Tanaka, N.
    Aibe, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E538 - E539
  • [13] Assessment of Filtered Back Projection, Adaptive Statistical, and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction for Reduced Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography
    Padole, Atul
    Singh, Sarabjeet
    Lira, Diego
    Blake, Michael A.
    Pourjabbar, Sarvenaz
    Khawaja, Ranish Deedar Ali
    Choy, Garry
    Saini, Sanjay
    Do, Synho
    Kalra, Mannudeep K.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2015, 39 (04) : 462 - 467
  • [14] Low-Dose Computed Tomography of the Chest Using Iterative Reconstruction Versus Filtered Back Projection: Comparison of Image Quality
    Lee, Youkyung
    Jin, Kwang Nam
    Lee, Nyoung Keun
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2012, 36 (05) : 512 - 517
  • [15] Computed Tomography Image Quality Evaluation of a New Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in the Abdomen (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V) a Comparison With Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection Reconstructions
    Goodenberger, Martin H.
    Wagner-Bartak, Nicolaus A.
    Gupta, Shiva
    Liu, Xinming
    Yap, Ramon Q.
    Sun, Jia
    Tamm, Eric P.
    Jensen, Corey T.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2018, 42 (02) : 184 - 190
  • [16] Comparison of image quality in pediatric head computed tomography reconstructed using blended iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection
    Ho, Chang
    Oberle, Robert
    Wu, Isaac
    Kim, Eugene
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2014, 38 (03) : 231 - 235
  • [17] Physician Preference Between Low-Dose Computed Tomography With a Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm and Routine-Dose Computed Tomography With Filtered Back Projection in Abdominopelvic Imaging
    Hardie, Andrew D.
    Tipnis, Sameer V.
    Rieter, William J.
    Rissing, Michael S.
    De Cecco, Carlo N.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2013, 37 (06) : 932 - 936
  • [18] A comparison between filtered back projection SPECT reconstruction and a new iterative reconstruction algorithm: A phantom study
    Zoccarato, O.
    Campini, R.
    Marcassa, C.
    Calza, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2007, 34 : S237 - S237
  • [19] Low-Dose Chest Computed Tomography With Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction, Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space, and Filtered Back Projection: Studies on Image Quality
    Hwang, Hye Jeon
    Seo, Joon Beom
    Lee, Hyun Joo
    Lee, Sang Min
    Kim, Eun Young
    Oh, Sang Young
    Kim, Ji-Eun
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2013, 37 (04) : 610 - 617
  • [20] Fast algorithm for Joseph’s forward projection in iterative computed tomography reconstruction
    Zhang S.
    Zhang Y.
    Tuo M.
    Zhang H.
    Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2023, 14 (09) : 12535 - 12548