Additional multifocal sulcus-based intraocular lens: Alternative to multifocal intraocular lens in the capsular bag

被引:18
|
作者
Schrecker, Jens [1 ]
Kroeber, Sandra [1 ]
Eppig, Timo [2 ]
Langenbucher, Achim [2 ]
机构
[1] Klinikum Rudolf Virchow, Dept Ophthalmol, D-08371 Glauchau, Germany
[2] Univ Saarland, Homburg, Germany
来源
关键词
ADD-ON IOL; PSEUDOPHAKIC EYES; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; PUPIL SIZE; IMPLANTATION; ASTIGMATISM; ACUITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.10.047
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcomes of additional multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) for sulcus fixation with those of standard multifocal IOLs in the capsular bag. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Rudolf-Virchow-Klinikum Glauchau, Glauchau, Germany. DESIGN: Prospective controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Eyes had phacoemulsification and implantation of a monofocal IOL in the capsular bag and an additional aberration-free diffractive IOL in the ciliary sulcus (multifocal add-on IOL group). Measurements of uncorrected and distance-corrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuities; contrast sensitivity; and defocus curve were performed 3 months postoperatively. Results were compared with those in eyes with an aberration-correcting diffractive posterior chamber IOL (multifocal PC IOL group). RESULTS: The multifocal add-on IOL group comprised 34 eyes of 20 patients and the multifocal PC IOL group, 31 eyes of 17 patients. Cataract surgery, IOL implantation, and the postoperative course were uneventful in all cases. There were no statistically significant differences in uncorrected and distance-corrected distance, intermediate, or near visual acuities between the 2 groups. The median uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.00 logMAR in both groups, and the median uncorrected near visual acuity was 0.10 logMAR in both groups. Contrast sensitivity testing yielded significantly better results in the multifocal add-on IOL group, especially at spatial frequencies over 1.5 cycles per degree. Defocus curves were similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Visual performance with a multifocal diffractive add-on IOL was equivalent to that achieved with a commonly used multifocal diffractive PC IOL.
引用
收藏
页码:548 / 555
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical evaluation of the OptiVis™ multifocal intraocular lens
    Matteo Piovella
    Jean-Michel Bosc
    Advances in Therapy, 2011, 28 : 1012 - 1020
  • [32] NEW MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR-LENS DESIGN
    HANSEN, TE
    CORYDON, L
    KRAG, S
    THIM, K
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1990, 16 (01): : 38 - 41
  • [33] Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation
    Woodward, Maria A.
    Randleman, J. Bradley
    Stulting, R. Doyle
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 35 (06): : 992 - 997
  • [34] Appearance of images through a multifocal intraocular lens
    Peli, Eli
    Lang, Alan
    Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision, 2001, 18 (02): : 302 - 309
  • [35] Clinical evaluation of the OptiVis™ multifocal intraocular lens
    Piovella, Matteo
    Bosc, Jean-Michel
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2011, 28 (11) : 1012 - 1020
  • [36] Lens Surgery: Use of multifocal Intraocular Lenses
    Shajari, Mehdi
    Mayer, Wolfgang J.
    Priglinger, Siegfried
    AUGENHEILKUNDE UP2DATE, 2019, 9 (04) : 347 - 357
  • [37] Sulcus-based 25-gauge vitrectomy with transscleral intraocular lens fixation
    R A Zaldivar
    K H Baratz
    G J Griepentrog
    J S Pulido
    Eye, 2007, 21 : 1445 - 1447
  • [38] Appearance of images through a multifocal intraocular lens
    Peli, E
    Lang, A
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2001, 18 (02): : 302 - 309
  • [39] Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation
    Tarib, Imane
    Asroui, Lara
    Ferguson, Tanner
    Randleman, James
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (08)
  • [40] Lens Surgery: Implantation of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses
    Shajari, Mehdi
    Mayer, Wolfgang J.
    Priglinger, Siegfried
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2019, 236 (12) : 1461 - 1469