Predicting environmental impacts of smallholder wheat production by coupling life cycle assessment and machine learning

被引:1
|
作者
Yu, Chunxiao [1 ]
Xu, Gang [1 ,3 ]
Cai, Ming [2 ]
Li, Yuan [1 ]
Wang, Lijia [1 ]
Zhang, Yan [1 ]
Lin, Huilong [1 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Coll Pastoral Agr Sci & Technol, Engn Res Ctr Grassland Ind, Minist Educ,State Key Lab Herbage Improvement & Gr, Lanzhou 730020, Peoples R China
[2] Yunnan Acad Grassland & Anim Sci, Kunming 650212, Peoples R China
[3] Lanzhou Univ, Coll Pastoral Agr Sci & Technol, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Smallholder; Policy making; Climate change; Farming practice; Machine learning; Life cycle assessment; Wheat; NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION; LAND FRAGMENTATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; AIR-POLLUTION; CHINA; FARMERS; ADAPTATION; PM2.5; PARTICIPATION; LIVELIHOODS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171097
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wheat grain production is a vital component of the food supply produced by smallholder farms but faces significant threats from climate change. This study evaluated eight environmental impacts of wheat production using life cycle assessment based on survey data from 274 households, then built random forest models with 21 input features to contrast the environmental responses of different farming practices across three shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs), spanning from 2024 to 2100. The results indicate significant environmental repercussions. Compared to the baseline period of 2018-2020, a similar upward trend in environmental impacts is observed, showing an average annual growth rate of 5.88 % (ranging from 0.45 to 18.56 %) under the sustainable pathway (SSP119) scenario; 5.90 % (ranging from 1.00 to 18.15 %) for the intermediate development pathway (SSP245); and 6.22 % (ranging from 1.16 to 17.74 %) under the rapid economic development pathway (SSP585). Variation in rainfall is identified as the primary driving factor of the increased environmental impacts, whereas its relationship with rising temperatures is not significant. The results suggest adopting farming practices as a vital strategy for smallholder farms to mitigate climate change impacts. Emphasizing appropriate fertilizer application and straw recycling can significantly reduce the environmental footprint of wheat production. Standardized fertilization could reduce the environmental impact index by 11.10 to 47.83 %, while straw recycling might decrease respiratory inorganics and photochemical oxidant formation potential by over 40 %. Combined, these approaches could lower the impact index by 12.31 to 63.38 %. The findings highlight the importance of adopting enhanced farming practices within smallholder farming systems in the context of climate change. Spotlights: center dot China's smallholder wheat farming is increasingly exposed to climate threats, risking resource depletion and pollution center dot Increasing eco-impacts of smallholder wheat farming could be mitigated by regulated fertilizer use and straw recycling center dot Life cycle assessment combined with machine learning targets future environmental impacts in dynamic climate scenarios center dot The study offers actionable policy advice for sustainable smallholder wheat farming practices center dot Future work may probe machine learning's role in forecasting smallholder production behaviors and farming decision aid
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Consequential life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts of an increased rapemethylester (RME) production in Switzerland
    Reinhard, Juergen
    Zah, Rainer
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (06): : 2361 - 2373
  • [32] A Life Cycle Assessment Study of the Impacts of Pig Breeding on the Environmental Sustainability of Pig Production
    Thoma, Greg J.
    Baker, Banks
    Knap, Pieter W.
    ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (16):
  • [33] Quantitative assessment of environmental impacts on life cycle of highways
    Park, K
    Hwang, Y
    Seo, S
    Seo, H
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2003, 129 (01): : 25 - 31
  • [34] The effects of energy consumption of alumina production in the environmental impacts using life cycle assessment
    Saez-Guinoa, Javier
    Garcia-Franco, Enrique
    Llera-Sastresa, Eva
    Romeo, Luis M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (03): : 380 - 393
  • [35] Environmental impacts of hydrotreating processes for the production of clean fuels based on life cycle assessment
    Wu, Le
    Liu, Yongzhong
    FUEL, 2016, 164 : 352 - 360
  • [36] The effects of energy consumption of alumina production in the environmental impacts using life cycle assessment
    Javier Sáez-Guinoa
    Enrique García-Franco
    Eva Llera-Sastresa
    Luis M. Romeo
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2024, 29 : 380 - 393
  • [37] Environmental analysis of intensity level in wheat crop production using life cycle assessment
    Charles, R
    Jolliet, O
    Gaillard, G
    Pellet, D
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 113 (1-4) : 216 - 225
  • [38] Life cycle assessment of typical methanol production routes: The environmental impacts analysis and power optimization
    Chen, Zhuo
    Shen, Qun
    Sun, Nannan
    Wei, Wei
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 220 : 408 - 416
  • [39] Environmental impacts of extensive and intensive beef production systems in Thailand evaluated by life cycle assessment
    Ogino, Akifumi
    Sommart, Kritapon
    Subepang, Sayan
    Mitsumori, Makoto
    Hayashi, Keisuke
    Yamashita, Takahiro
    Tanaka, Yasuo
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 22 - 31
  • [40] Resource use and environmental impacts from Australian export lamb production: a life cycle assessment
    Wiedemann, S. G.
    Yan, M. -J.
    Murphy, C. M.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (07) : 1070 - 1080