Predicting environmental impacts of smallholder wheat production by coupling life cycle assessment and machine learning

被引:1
|
作者
Yu, Chunxiao [1 ]
Xu, Gang [1 ,3 ]
Cai, Ming [2 ]
Li, Yuan [1 ]
Wang, Lijia [1 ]
Zhang, Yan [1 ]
Lin, Huilong [1 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Coll Pastoral Agr Sci & Technol, Engn Res Ctr Grassland Ind, Minist Educ,State Key Lab Herbage Improvement & Gr, Lanzhou 730020, Peoples R China
[2] Yunnan Acad Grassland & Anim Sci, Kunming 650212, Peoples R China
[3] Lanzhou Univ, Coll Pastoral Agr Sci & Technol, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Smallholder; Policy making; Climate change; Farming practice; Machine learning; Life cycle assessment; Wheat; NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION; LAND FRAGMENTATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; AIR-POLLUTION; CHINA; FARMERS; ADAPTATION; PM2.5; PARTICIPATION; LIVELIHOODS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171097
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wheat grain production is a vital component of the food supply produced by smallholder farms but faces significant threats from climate change. This study evaluated eight environmental impacts of wheat production using life cycle assessment based on survey data from 274 households, then built random forest models with 21 input features to contrast the environmental responses of different farming practices across three shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs), spanning from 2024 to 2100. The results indicate significant environmental repercussions. Compared to the baseline period of 2018-2020, a similar upward trend in environmental impacts is observed, showing an average annual growth rate of 5.88 % (ranging from 0.45 to 18.56 %) under the sustainable pathway (SSP119) scenario; 5.90 % (ranging from 1.00 to 18.15 %) for the intermediate development pathway (SSP245); and 6.22 % (ranging from 1.16 to 17.74 %) under the rapid economic development pathway (SSP585). Variation in rainfall is identified as the primary driving factor of the increased environmental impacts, whereas its relationship with rising temperatures is not significant. The results suggest adopting farming practices as a vital strategy for smallholder farms to mitigate climate change impacts. Emphasizing appropriate fertilizer application and straw recycling can significantly reduce the environmental footprint of wheat production. Standardized fertilization could reduce the environmental impact index by 11.10 to 47.83 %, while straw recycling might decrease respiratory inorganics and photochemical oxidant formation potential by over 40 %. Combined, these approaches could lower the impact index by 12.31 to 63.38 %. The findings highlight the importance of adopting enhanced farming practices within smallholder farming systems in the context of climate change. Spotlights: center dot China's smallholder wheat farming is increasingly exposed to climate threats, risking resource depletion and pollution center dot Increasing eco-impacts of smallholder wheat farming could be mitigated by regulated fertilizer use and straw recycling center dot Life cycle assessment combined with machine learning targets future environmental impacts in dynamic climate scenarios center dot The study offers actionable policy advice for sustainable smallholder wheat farming practices center dot Future work may probe machine learning's role in forecasting smallholder production behaviors and farming decision aid
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle environmental impacts of saffron production in Iran
    Khanali, Majid
    Farahani, Saeid Shahvarooghi
    Shojaei, Hamidreza
    Elhami, Behzad
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2017, 24 (05) : 4812 - 4821
  • [22] Life cycle environmental impacts of saffron production in Iran
    Majid Khanali
    Saeid Shahvarooghi Farahani
    Hamidreza Shojaei
    Behzad Elhami
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24 : 4812 - 4821
  • [23] Reducing the environmental impacts of vitreous optical fiber production - A Life Cycle Impact Assessment
    Pinto, Julian T. M.
    Amaral, Karen J.
    Hartard, Susanne
    Janissek, Paulo R.
    Helling, Klaus
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 165 : 762 - 776
  • [24] Environmental impacts of extensive beef production in Colombia by life cycle assessment: a case study
    Arcila, Sara
    Correa, Natalia
    Pachón, Sebastián
    Valderrama, Luis Giraldo A.
    Cano-Londoño, Natalia A.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (43) : 55720 - 55735
  • [25] Global environmental impacts of silver nanoparticle production methods supported by life cycle assessment
    Temizel-Sekeryan S.
    Hicks A.L.
    Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020, 156
  • [26] Global environmental impacts of silver nanoparticle production methods supported by life cycle assessment
    Temizel-Sekeryan, Sila
    Hicks, Andrea L.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2020, 156
  • [27] Environmental Impacts of the Beef Production Chain in the Northeast of Portugal Using Life Cycle Assessment
    Presumido, Pedro Henrique
    Sousa, Fernando
    Goncalves, Artur
    Dal Bosco, Tatiane Cristina
    Feliciano, Manuel
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2018, 8 (10):
  • [28] A review of the effectiveness of Life Cycle Assessment for gauging environmental impacts from cement production
    Ige, Oluwafemi E.
    Olanrewaju, Oludolapo A.
    Duffy, Kevin J.
    Obiora, Collins
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 324
  • [29] The Life-cycle Assessment and Environmental Impacts of Electricity Production in Porto Santo Island
    Torabi, Roham
    Rizzoli, Nicolo
    Arosio, Valeria
    Morgado-Dias, F.
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY IN SMALL DEVELOPING ECONOMIES (ES2DE), 2017,
  • [30] The environmental impacts of commercial poultry production systems using life cycle assessment: a review
    Kheiralipour, Kamran
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Karimi, Mahmoud
    Nadimi, Mohammad
    Paliwal, Jitendra
    WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2024, 80 (01) : 33 - 54