Developing feasible and acceptable strategies for integrating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in gender-affirming care: An implementation study

被引:9
|
作者
Kamran, Rakhshan [1 ,2 ]
Jackman, Liam [3 ]
Laws, Anna [4 ]
Stepney, Melissa [5 ]
Harrison, Conrad [1 ]
Jain, Abhilash [1 ]
Rodrigues, Jeremy [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskeleta, Oxford, England
[2] McMaster Univ, Michael G DeGroote Sch Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Northern Reg Gender Dysphoria Serv, Newcastle, England
[5] Univ Oxford, Dept Psychiat, Oxford, England
[6] Univ Warwick, Warwick Clin Trials Unit, Warwick, England
[7] Stoke Mandeville Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 04期
关键词
HEALTH; TRANSGENDER;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0301922
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective Use CFIR guidance to create comprehensive, evidence-based, feasible, and acceptable gender-affirming care PROM implementation strategies.Design, setting, participants A 3-Phase participatory process was followed to design feasible and acceptable strategies for integrating PROMs in gender-affirming care. In Phase 1, barriers and enablers to PROM implementation for gender-affirming care were identified from a previous systematic review and our prior qualitative study. We used the CFIR-ERIC tool to match previously identified barriers and enablers with expert-endorsed implementation strategies. In Phase 2, implementation strategy outputs from CFIR-ERIC were organised according to cumulative percentage value. In Phase 3, gender-affirming care PROM implementation strategies underwent iterative refinement based on rounds of stakeholder feedback with seven patient and public partners and a gender-affirming healthcare professional.Results The systematic review and qualitative study identified barriers and enablers to PROM implementation spanning all five CFIR domains, and 30 CFIR constructs. The top healthcare professional-relevant strategies to PROM implementation from the CFIR-ERIC output include: identifying and preparing implementation champions, collecting feedback on PROM implementation, and capturing and sharing local knowledge between clinics on implementation. Top patient-relevant strategies include: having educational material on PROMs, ensuring adaptability of PROMs, and collaborating with key local organisations who may be able to support patients.Conclusions This study developed evidence-based, feasible, and acceptable strategies for integrating PROMs in gender-affirming care, representing evidence from a systematic review of 286 international articles, a qualitative study of 24 gender-affirming care patients and healthcare professionals, and iteration from 7 patient and public partners and a gender-affirming healthcare professional. The finalised strategies include patient- and healthcare professional-relevant strategies for implementing PROMs in gender-affirming care. Clinicians and researchers can select and tailor implementation strategies best applying to their gender-affirming care setting.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by orthopedic surgeons in Saudi Arabia
    Fayez Alshehri
    Abdulaziz Alarabi
    Mohammed Alharthi
    Thamer Alanazi
    Ahmed Alohali
    Mohammad Alsaleem
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15
  • [32] A review of the barriers to using Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in routine cancer care
    Hanh Nguyen
    Butow, Phyllis
    Dhillon, Haryana
    Sundaresan, Puma
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2021, 68 (02) : 186 - 195
  • [33] Integrating Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) into routine primary care for patients with multimorbidity: a feasibility study
    Porter, Ian
    Gangannagaripalli, Jaheeda
    Bramwell, Charlotte
    Valderas, Jose M.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2016, 14
  • [35] Enrollment disparities in the PCPLC's patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) study
    Mcnevin, Kate E.
    Nicassio, Lauren N.
    Rice-Townsend, Samuel E.
    Avansino, Jeffrey R.
    Badillo, Andrea
    Calkins, Casey M.
    Durham, Megan M.
    Crady, Rachel
    Reeder, Ron W.
    Rentea, Rebecca M.
    Rollins, Michael D.
    Smith, Caitlin A.
    Pediat Colorectal Pelvic Learning Consortium
    PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 41 (01)
  • [36] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care: recommendations and challenges IN REPLY
    Agarwal, Anupriya
    Morton, Rachael L.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2022, 217 (02) : 111 - 111
  • [37] Integrating patient-reported outcome measures in congenital heart disease care
    Constantine, Andrew
    Dimopoulos, Konstantinos
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, 2021, 7 (04) : 325 - 326
  • [38] Barriers of use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in asthma and rhinitis care: preliminary insights from the multinational 'PROMUSE' study
    Cherrez-Ojeda, I
    Bousquet, J.
    Maurer, M.
    Zuberbier, T.
    Intriago, B.
    Ramon, G. D.
    Larenas-Linnemann, D.
    Caballero-Lopez, C.
    Al-Mansouri, M. Al-Nesf
    Ibrahim, T. Mohmmed
    Neisinger, S.
    Fomina, D.
    Zalewska, A.
    Oztas, R.
    Mihaltan, F.
    Kasperska-Zajac, A.
    Kolkhir, P.
    Criado, R. F.
    Ensina, L. F.
    Chong Neto, H. J.
    Rosario, N.
    Gimenez-Arnau, A.
    Pesque, D.
    Shijin, C. Crespo
    Logrono, R. Hinostroza
    Robles-Velasco, K.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 60
  • [39] Strategies for Effective Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Arthroplasty Practice
    Franklin, Patricia D.
    Bond, Christina P.
    Rothrock, Nan E.
    Cella, David
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2021, 103 (24): : E97
  • [40] Addressing Missing Data in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS): Implications for the Use of PROMS for Comparing Provider Performance
    Gomes, Manuel
    Gutacker, Nils
    Bojke, Chris
    Street, Andrew
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2016, 25 (05) : 515 - 528