Developing feasible and acceptable strategies for integrating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in gender-affirming care: An implementation study

被引:9
|
作者
Kamran, Rakhshan [1 ,2 ]
Jackman, Liam [3 ]
Laws, Anna [4 ]
Stepney, Melissa [5 ]
Harrison, Conrad [1 ]
Jain, Abhilash [1 ]
Rodrigues, Jeremy [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskeleta, Oxford, England
[2] McMaster Univ, Michael G DeGroote Sch Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Northern Reg Gender Dysphoria Serv, Newcastle, England
[5] Univ Oxford, Dept Psychiat, Oxford, England
[6] Univ Warwick, Warwick Clin Trials Unit, Warwick, England
[7] Stoke Mandeville Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 04期
关键词
HEALTH; TRANSGENDER;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0301922
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective Use CFIR guidance to create comprehensive, evidence-based, feasible, and acceptable gender-affirming care PROM implementation strategies.Design, setting, participants A 3-Phase participatory process was followed to design feasible and acceptable strategies for integrating PROMs in gender-affirming care. In Phase 1, barriers and enablers to PROM implementation for gender-affirming care were identified from a previous systematic review and our prior qualitative study. We used the CFIR-ERIC tool to match previously identified barriers and enablers with expert-endorsed implementation strategies. In Phase 2, implementation strategy outputs from CFIR-ERIC were organised according to cumulative percentage value. In Phase 3, gender-affirming care PROM implementation strategies underwent iterative refinement based on rounds of stakeholder feedback with seven patient and public partners and a gender-affirming healthcare professional.Results The systematic review and qualitative study identified barriers and enablers to PROM implementation spanning all five CFIR domains, and 30 CFIR constructs. The top healthcare professional-relevant strategies to PROM implementation from the CFIR-ERIC output include: identifying and preparing implementation champions, collecting feedback on PROM implementation, and capturing and sharing local knowledge between clinics on implementation. Top patient-relevant strategies include: having educational material on PROMs, ensuring adaptability of PROMs, and collaborating with key local organisations who may be able to support patients.Conclusions This study developed evidence-based, feasible, and acceptable strategies for integrating PROMs in gender-affirming care, representing evidence from a systematic review of 286 international articles, a qualitative study of 24 gender-affirming care patients and healthcare professionals, and iteration from 7 patient and public partners and a gender-affirming healthcare professional. The finalised strategies include patient- and healthcare professional-relevant strategies for implementing PROMs in gender-affirming care. Clinicians and researchers can select and tailor implementation strategies best applying to their gender-affirming care setting.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An international qualitative study informing the development of a patient-reported outcome instrument for adults receiving gender-affirming treatments: the GENDER-Q
    Kaur, Manraj
    Deibert, Shelby
    Satterwhite, Thomas
    Santucci, Richard
    McEvenue, Giancarlo
    Semple, John
    Johnson, Natasha
    Morrison, Shane
    Mullender, Margriet
    Poulsen, Lotte
    Ross, Maeghan
    Pusic, Andrea
    Klassen, Anne
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (SUPPL 1) : S70 - S71
  • [42] GENERIC PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES (PROMS) FOR USE IN PEDIATRIC AGE GROUP: REVIEW OF AVAILABLE MEASURES
    Afroz, N.
    Naujoks, C.
    Kattayoun, K.
    Patalano, F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S542 - S542
  • [43] Conscientious use of patient-reported outcome measures in supportive care
    Smith, Derek K.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2023, 31 (04)
  • [44] Conscientious use of patient-reported outcome measures in supportive care
    Derek K. Smith
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023, 31
  • [45] Developing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures that Can Improve Kidney Care
    Hartwell, Lori
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 16 (09): : 1301 - 1302
  • [46] Achieving patient priorities: an alternative to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for promoting patient-centred care
    Naik, Aanand D.
    Catic, Angela
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2021, 30 (02) : 92 - 95
  • [47] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) use in post-stroke patient care and clinical practice: a realist synthesis protocol
    A. Smith
    J. Hewitt
    T. J. Quinn
    M. Robling
    Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [48] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) use in post-stroke patient care and clinical practice: a realist synthesis protocol
    Smith, A.
    Hewitt, J.
    Quinn, T. J.
    Robling, M.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [49] A systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
    S. Ishaque
    J. Karnon
    G. Chen
    R. Nair
    A. B. Salter
    Quality of Life Research, 2019, 28 : 567 - 592
  • [50] A systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
    Ishaque, S.
    Karnon, J.
    Chen, G.
    Nair, R.
    Salter, A. B.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (03) : 567 - 592