Developing feasible and acceptable strategies for integrating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in gender-affirming care: An implementation study

被引:9
|
作者
Kamran, Rakhshan [1 ,2 ]
Jackman, Liam [3 ]
Laws, Anna [4 ]
Stepney, Melissa [5 ]
Harrison, Conrad [1 ]
Jain, Abhilash [1 ]
Rodrigues, Jeremy [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskeleta, Oxford, England
[2] McMaster Univ, Michael G DeGroote Sch Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Northern Reg Gender Dysphoria Serv, Newcastle, England
[5] Univ Oxford, Dept Psychiat, Oxford, England
[6] Univ Warwick, Warwick Clin Trials Unit, Warwick, England
[7] Stoke Mandeville Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 04期
关键词
HEALTH; TRANSGENDER;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0301922
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective Use CFIR guidance to create comprehensive, evidence-based, feasible, and acceptable gender-affirming care PROM implementation strategies.Design, setting, participants A 3-Phase participatory process was followed to design feasible and acceptable strategies for integrating PROMs in gender-affirming care. In Phase 1, barriers and enablers to PROM implementation for gender-affirming care were identified from a previous systematic review and our prior qualitative study. We used the CFIR-ERIC tool to match previously identified barriers and enablers with expert-endorsed implementation strategies. In Phase 2, implementation strategy outputs from CFIR-ERIC were organised according to cumulative percentage value. In Phase 3, gender-affirming care PROM implementation strategies underwent iterative refinement based on rounds of stakeholder feedback with seven patient and public partners and a gender-affirming healthcare professional.Results The systematic review and qualitative study identified barriers and enablers to PROM implementation spanning all five CFIR domains, and 30 CFIR constructs. The top healthcare professional-relevant strategies to PROM implementation from the CFIR-ERIC output include: identifying and preparing implementation champions, collecting feedback on PROM implementation, and capturing and sharing local knowledge between clinics on implementation. Top patient-relevant strategies include: having educational material on PROMs, ensuring adaptability of PROMs, and collaborating with key local organisations who may be able to support patients.Conclusions This study developed evidence-based, feasible, and acceptable strategies for integrating PROMs in gender-affirming care, representing evidence from a systematic review of 286 international articles, a qualitative study of 24 gender-affirming care patients and healthcare professionals, and iteration from 7 patient and public partners and a gender-affirming healthcare professional. The finalised strategies include patient- and healthcare professional-relevant strategies for implementing PROMs in gender-affirming care. Clinicians and researchers can select and tailor implementation strategies best applying to their gender-affirming care setting.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine care palliative radiotherapy
    Schuler, Thilo
    Hruby, George
    Eade, Thomas
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 154 : E10 - E11
  • [22] Selection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in health systems
    Al Sayah, Fatima
    Jin, Xuejing
    Johnson, Jeffrey A.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2021, 5 (SUPPL 2)
  • [23] Selection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in health systems
    Fatima Al Sayah
    Xuejing Jin
    Jeffrey A. Johnson
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 5
  • [24] Statistical process control assessed implementation fidelity of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine care
    Roberts, Natasha A.
    Alexander, Kimberly
    Wyld, David
    Janda, Monika
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 127 : 76 - 86
  • [25] Patient-reported outcome measures for assessing urinary dysfunction following gender-affirming genital surgery: A narrative review of the literature
    Keiner, Cathrine
    Okamuro, Kyle
    Bate, Taylor
    Dy, Geolani
    Anger, Jennifer
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2024, 43 (08) : 2110 - 2122
  • [26] The use and implementation of patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMS/PREMs) in integrated care settings - a bridge between health and social care?
    Anderson, Nicola
    Hughes, Sarah
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Collis, Philip
    Calvert, Melanie
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 33 : S68 - S68
  • [27] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care: recommendations and challenges
    Trujols, Joan
    Duran-Sindreu, Santiago
    Portella, Maria J.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2022, 217 (02) : 110 - 110
  • [28] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care: recommendations and challenges
    Agarwal, Anupriya
    Pain, Tilley
    Levesque, Jean-Frederic
    Girgis, Afaf
    Hoffman, Anna
    Karnon, Jonathan
    King, Madeleine T.
    Shah, Karan K.
    Morton, Rachael L.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2022, 216 (01) : 9 - 11
  • [29] Using Implementation Science to Evaluate the Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in a Clinical Heart Failure Care Setting
    Lawrason, Sarah V. C.
    Ross, Heather
    Mcdonald, Michael
    Posada, Juan Duero
    Engbers, Samantha
    Simard, Anne
    CJC OPEN, 2024, 6 (12) : 1443 - 1452
  • [30] Use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by orthopedic surgeons in Saudi Arabia
    Alshehri, Fayez
    Alarabi, Abdulaziz
    Alharthi, Mohammed
    Alanazi, Thamer
    Alohali, Ahmed
    Alsaleem, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)