Addressing Missing Data in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS): Implications for the Use of PROMS for Comparing Provider Performance

被引:44
|
作者
Gomes, Manuel [1 ]
Gutacker, Nils [2 ]
Bojke, Chris [2 ]
Street, Andrew [2 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Policy, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH, England
[2] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
missing data; multiple imputation; patient-reported outcome measures; provider performance; missing not at random; MULTIPLE IMPUTATION; INSTITUTIONAL PERFORMANCE; HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE; NONRESPONSE BIAS; ROUTINE USE; PERCEPTIONS; MODELS; IMPACT; CARE; HIP;
D O I
10.1002/hec.3173
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are now routinely collected in the English National Health Service and used to compare and reward hospital performance within a high-powered pay-for-performance scheme. However, PROMs are prone to missing data. For example, hospitals often fail to administer the pre-operative questionnaire at hospital admission, or patients may refuse to participate or fail to return their post-operative questionnaire. A key concern with missing PROMs is that the individuals with complete information tend to be an unrepresentative sample of patients within each provider and inferences based on the complete cases will be misleading. This study proposes a strategy for addressing missing data in the English PROM survey using multiple imputation techniques and investigates its impact on assessing provider performance. We find that inferences about relative provider performance are sensitive to the assumptions made about the reasons for the missing data. (c) 2015 The Authors. Health Economics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 528
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES (PROMS)
    Barnard, K.
    [J]. DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 21 : A7 - A7
  • [2] Patient-Reported Outcomes (Pros) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (Proms)
    Weldring, Theresa
    Smith, Sheree M. S.
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES INSIGHTS, 2013, 6 : 61 - 68
  • [3] An introduction to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in physiotherapy
    Kyte, D. G.
    Calvert, M.
    van der Wees, P. J.
    ten Hove, R.
    Tolan, S.
    Hill, J. C.
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2015, 101 (02) : 119 - 125
  • [4] Advancing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in Canada
    Chow, Ellis
    Cho, Maria Zaccaria
    Faye, Laura L.
    Sawatzky, Richard
    Chan, Eric K. H.
    Webster, Greg
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 : 76 - 76
  • [5] Selection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in health systems
    Al Sayah, Fatima
    Jin, Xuejing
    Johnson, Jeffrey A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2021, 5 (SUPPL 2)
  • [6] Selection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in health systems
    Fatima Al Sayah
    Xuejing Jin
    Jeffrey A. Johnson
    [J]. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 5
  • [7] An introduction to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in trauma
    Turner, Grace M.
    Slade, Anita
    Retzer, Ameeta
    McMullan, Christel
    Kyte, Derek
    Belli, Antonio
    Calvert, Melanie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2019, 86 (02): : 314 - 320
  • [8] PROMs - Patient Reported Outcome Measures
    de Zwaan, Martina
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPIE PSYCHOSOMATIK MEDIZINISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE, 2017, 67 (11) : 455 - 456
  • [9] Use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by orthopedic surgeons in Saudi Arabia
    Alshehri, Fayez
    Alarabi, Abdulaziz
    Alharthi, Mohammed
    Alanazi, Thamer
    Alohali, Ahmed
    Alsaleem, Mohammad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [10] Gender perspective in the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in rare diseases
    Perez, Sara
    Funes, Silvina
    Leyra, Begona
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (SUPPL 1) : 5 - 5