Evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST System Version 2.5 for Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacteria From Positive Blood Culture Broth and Subcultured Colony Isolates

被引:2
|
作者
Kim, Tae Yeul [1 ]
Kang, Minhee [2 ,3 ]
Shim, Hyang Jin [4 ]
Kang, On-Kyun [1 ]
Huh, Hee Jae [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Nam Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Lab Med & Genet, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Samsung Med Ctr, Smart Healthcare Res Inst, Biomed Engn Res Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Adv Inst Hlth Sci & Technol, Dept Med Device Management & Res, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Samsung Med Ctr, Samsung Biomed Res Inst, Ctr Clin Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobial susceptibility testing; bloodstream infections; broth microdilution; Gram-negative; positive blood culture broth; QMAC-dRAST; VITEK; 2; TURNAROUND TIME; VITEK-2; SYSTEM; IDENTIFICATION; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1002/jcla.25043
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for bloodstream infections (BSIs) facilitates the optimization of antimicrobial therapy, preventing antimicrobial resistance and improving patient outcomes. QMAC-dRAST (QuantaMatrix Inc., Korea) is a rapid AST platform based on microfluidic chip technology that performs AST directly using positive blood culture broth (PBCB). This study evaluated the performance of QMAC-dRAST for Gram-negative bacteria using PBCB and subcultured colony isolates, comparing it with that of VITEK 2 (bioM & eacute;rieux, France) using broth microdilution (BMD) as the reference method. Methods We included 141 Gram-negative blood culture isolates from patients with BSI and 12 carbapenemase-producing clinical isolates of Enterobacterales spiked into blood culture bottles. QMAC-dRAST performance was evaluated using PBCB and colony isolates, whereas VITEK 2 and BMD were tested only on colony isolates. Results For PBCB, QMAC-dRAST achieved 92.1% categorical agreement (CA), 95.3% essential agreement (EA), with 1.8% very major errors (VMEs), 3.5% major errors (MEs), and 5.2% minor errors (mEs). With colony isolates, it exhibited 92.5% CA and 95.1% EA, with 2.0% VMEs, 3.2% MEs, and 4.8% mEs. VITEK 2 showed 94.1% CA and 96.0% EA, with 4.3% VMEs, 0.4% MEs, and 4.3% mEs. QMAC-dRAST yielded elevated error rates for specific antimicrobial agents, with high VMEs for carbapenems and aminoglycosides. The median time to result for QMAC-dRAST was 5.9 h for PBCB samples and 6.1 h for subcultured colony isolates. Conclusions The QMAC-dRAST system demonstrated considerable strengths and comparable performance to the VITEK 2 system; however, challenges were discerned with specific antimicrobial agents, underlining a necessity for improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST V2.0 system for rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing of Gram-negative blood culture isolates
    Grohs, Patrick
    Rondinaud, Emilie
    Fourar, Myriam
    Rouis, Karama
    Mainardi, Jean-Luc
    Podglajen, Isabelle
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2020, 172
  • [2] Performance Evaluation of the Quantamatrix QMAC-dRAST System for Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Directly from Blood Cultures
    Rosselin, Manon
    Prod'hom, Guy
    Greub, Gilbert
    Croxatto, Antony
    MICROORGANISMS, 2022, 10 (06)
  • [3] Prospective evaluation of a rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test (QMAC-dRAST) for selecting optimal targeted antibiotics in positive blood culture
    Kim, Jeong-Han
    Kim, Taek Soo
    Jung, Hyun Gul
    Kang, Chang Kyung
    Jun, Kang-Il
    Han, Sangkwon
    Kim, Dong Young
    Kwon, Sunghoon
    Song, Kyoung-Ho
    Choe, Pyeong Gyun
    Bang, Ji Hwan
    Kim, Eu Suk
    Park, Sang Won
    Kim, Hong Bin
    Kim, Nam Joong
    Park, Wan Beom
    Oh, Myoung-don
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2019, 74 (08) : 2255 - 2260
  • [4] Assessment of version 2.5 of QMAC-dRAST for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing with reduced sample-to-answer turnaround time and an integrated expert system
    Grohs, Patrick
    Picard, Simon
    Mainardi, Jean-Luc
    Podglajen, Isabelle
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES NOW, 2021, 51 (05): : 470 - 476
  • [5] QMAC-dRAST for direct testing of antibiotic susceptibility in positive blood-culture broth: a comparison with the BD Phoenix® system and the disc diffusion method
    Ponderand, L.
    Brunet, C.
    Lanoe, F.
    Sanchez-Garcia, K.
    Caspar, Y.
    JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2024, 6 (05):
  • [6] Performance of a System for Rapid Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacteria Directly from Positive Blood Culture Bottles
    Goransson, J.
    Sundqvist, M.
    Ghaderi, E.
    Lisby, J. G.
    Molin, Y.
    Eriksson, E.
    Carlsson, S.
    Cederlof, A.
    Ellis, L.
    Melin, J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 61 (03) : e0152522
  • [7] QMAC-dRAST for the direct testing of antibiotic susceptibility for Enterobacterales in positive blood-culture broth: a comparison of the performances with the MicroScan system and direct disc diffusion testing methods
    Gallois, E.
    Fihman, V
    Danjean, M.
    Gomart, C.
    Kimseng, H.
    Le Guen, R.
    Royer, G.
    Woerther, P. L.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2023, 78 (03) : 684 - 691
  • [8] Rapid Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Directly from Blood Cultures of Gram-negative and Gram-positive Isolates
    Kong, Haishen
    Zhang, Shujin
    Chen, Xiao
    Zhang, Weili
    Yang, Qing
    Fu, Yajie
    Wang, Yiyin
    Li, Xuefen
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2013, 59 (11-12) : 1305 - 1310
  • [9] RAPID ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF GRAM-NEGATIVE CLINICAL ISOLATES WITH THE AUTOMICROBIC SYSTEM
    BACKES, BA
    CAVALIERI, SJ
    RUDRIK, JT
    BRITT, EM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1984, 19 (06) : 744 - 747
  • [10] Evaluation of Wider System for Direct Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacilli from Positive Blood Culture Bottles
    D. Fontanals
    F. Salceda
    J. Hernández
    I. Sanfeliu
    M. Torra
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases , 2002, 21 : 693 - 695