Identifying design development factors in Australian PPP projects using an AHP framework

被引:20
|
作者
Raisbeck, Peter [1 ]
Tang, Llewellyn C. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Architecture Bldg & Planning, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Reading, Sch Construct Management & Engn, Reading, Berks, England
关键词
Analytic hierarchy process; design; design management; public-private partnerships;
D O I
10.1080/01446193.2012.729133
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In Australia consortiums will come together and create an initial design concept or sketch design at the public-private partnership (PPP) bid stage. If the bid is successful this initial design is then developed further. However, a winning bid may have been evaluated on financial criteria alone and the consortium's capability to develop the design through to project delivery may not have been thoroughly evaluated. In theory, design is a key process in PPP projects and the aim of the research was to understand what capabilities are important in the development of a design through this process. To clarify these issues, a range of activities and organizational factors linked to design development are proposed using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. This method was chosen in order to see which design development factors were ranked more highly by experts. In this research the hierarchy was designed employing the categories of exploratory and exploitative design development. Below each of these overarching categories, there were four design development functional distinctions: the two exploratory distinctions were Design (D) and Design Management (DM). The two exploitative distinctions were Design Support (DS) and Design Infrastructure (DI). A further list of 36 design development sub-criteria was developed under the above categories. These sub-criteria formed the basis of a survey of respondents drawn from a database of industry sources in the public domain as well as a list gathered from a large developer involved in PPP projects. It included relatively senior managers, PPP project managers and architects. Survey respondents identified a recent PPP project that they had worked on. From the 36 responses it can be seen that the exploratory Design (D) and Design Management (DM) activities were ranked more highly than the exploitative activities of Design Support (DS) and Design Infrastructure (DI) associated with a PPP project organization. This suggests that PPP frameworks should account for these exploratory factors as well as the exploitative factors associated with compliance, quality systems and project team infrastructure. This indicates that in PPP projects design development through the effective management of an initial design is a critical factor.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 39
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Identifying the Key Risk Factors of Mega Infrastructure Projects from an Extended Sustainable Development Perspective
    Li, Yuanli
    Xiang, Pengcheng
    You, Kairui
    Guo, Jin
    Liu, Zhaowen
    Ren, Hong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (14)
  • [32] Using Behavioral Driven Development (BDD) in Capstone Design Projects
    Goulart, Ana Elisa E.
    2014 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2014,
  • [33] Success Criteria and Factors for International Development Projects: A Life-Cycle-Based Framework
    Khang, Do Ba
    Moe, Tun Lin
    PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 39 (01) : 72 - 84
  • [34] Using the Australian and New Zealand Telehealth Committee framework to evaluate telehealth: identifying conceptual gaps
    Hughes, E
    King, C
    Kitt, S
    JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2002, 8 : 36 - 38
  • [35] Responsive human resource framework for design and building of mega housing development projects in Egypt
    Khodeir, Laila Mohamed
    Nabawy, E. Mohamed
    AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2021, 12 (02) : 2371 - 2383
  • [36] Supply chain risk prioritization using AHP and framework development: A perspective of the automotive industry
    Zaidi, M.
    Hasan, S. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 13 (04): : 283 - 293
  • [37] Identifying Significant Risks and Analyzing Risk Relationship for Construction PPP Projects in China Using Integrated FISM-MICMAC Approach
    Jiang, Xiaoyan
    Lu, Kun
    Xia, Bo
    Liu, Yong
    Cui, Caiyun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (19)
  • [38] A Framework for Identifying and Validating Idea Screening Criteria-A Case of Research and Development Projects in the Computing and Automation Industry
    Seboni, Lone
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 71 : 182 - 191
  • [39] Exploration of Crucial Factors Involved in Plants Development Using the Fuzzy AHP Method
    Upadhyay, Hemant
    Juneja, Abhinav
    Turabieh, Hamza
    Malik, Sapna
    Gupta, Ankur
    Bitsue, Zelalem Kiros
    Upadhyay, Chanchal
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [40] Cost-risk contingency framework for managing cost overrun in metropolitan projects: using fuzzy-AHP and simulation
    Afzal, Farman
    Shao, Yunfei
    Junaid, Danish
    Hanif, Muhammad Shehzad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2020, 13 (05) : 1121 - 1139