Identifying design development factors in Australian PPP projects using an AHP framework

被引:20
|
作者
Raisbeck, Peter [1 ]
Tang, Llewellyn C. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Architecture Bldg & Planning, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Reading, Sch Construct Management & Engn, Reading, Berks, England
关键词
Analytic hierarchy process; design; design management; public-private partnerships;
D O I
10.1080/01446193.2012.729133
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In Australia consortiums will come together and create an initial design concept or sketch design at the public-private partnership (PPP) bid stage. If the bid is successful this initial design is then developed further. However, a winning bid may have been evaluated on financial criteria alone and the consortium's capability to develop the design through to project delivery may not have been thoroughly evaluated. In theory, design is a key process in PPP projects and the aim of the research was to understand what capabilities are important in the development of a design through this process. To clarify these issues, a range of activities and organizational factors linked to design development are proposed using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. This method was chosen in order to see which design development factors were ranked more highly by experts. In this research the hierarchy was designed employing the categories of exploratory and exploitative design development. Below each of these overarching categories, there were four design development functional distinctions: the two exploratory distinctions were Design (D) and Design Management (DM). The two exploitative distinctions were Design Support (DS) and Design Infrastructure (DI). A further list of 36 design development sub-criteria was developed under the above categories. These sub-criteria formed the basis of a survey of respondents drawn from a database of industry sources in the public domain as well as a list gathered from a large developer involved in PPP projects. It included relatively senior managers, PPP project managers and architects. Survey respondents identified a recent PPP project that they had worked on. From the 36 responses it can be seen that the exploratory Design (D) and Design Management (DM) activities were ranked more highly than the exploitative activities of Design Support (DS) and Design Infrastructure (DI) associated with a PPP project organization. This suggests that PPP frameworks should account for these exploratory factors as well as the exploitative factors associated with compliance, quality systems and project team infrastructure. This indicates that in PPP projects design development through the effective management of an initial design is a critical factor.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 39
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Australian Health Informatics Competency Framework: Conceptual Design, Framework Development, and Certification Delivery
    Brommeyer, Mark
    Bichel-Findlay, Jen
    Tarabay, Tanija
    Schaper, Louise
    O'Driscoll, David
    Butler-Henderson, Kerryn
    MEDINFO 2023 - THE FUTURE IS ACCESSIBLE, 2024, 310 : 1211 - 1215
  • [22] Framework for crowdfunding sustainable development goals projects using blockchain
    Chalmeta, Ricardo
    Cabezas-Hernando, Daniel
    Silva, Jailson dos Santos
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2024,
  • [23] Modelling the critical success factors of women entrepreneurship using fuzzy AHP framework
    Amrita, Kumari
    Garg, Chandra Prakash
    Singh, Saumya
    JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2018, 10 (01) : 81 - 116
  • [24] Factors of broadband development and the design of a strategic policy framework
    Trkman, Peter
    Blazic, Borka Jerman
    Turk, Tomaz
    TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 2008, 32 (02) : 101 - 115
  • [25] On the Need for Effective Lean Daily Management in Engineering Design Projects: Development of a Framework
    Biskupska, Daria
    Ratnayake, R. M. Chandima
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2019, : 789 - 794
  • [26] PRIORITISING SUSTAINABILITY FACTORS FOR AUSTRALIAN COMMUNITY BUILDINGS' MANAGEMENT USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)
    Kalutara, Pushpitha
    Zhang, Guomin
    Setunge, Sujeeva
    Wakefield, Ron
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 22 (01) : 37 - 50
  • [27] Sustainable Development Contribution Assessment of Renewable Energy Projects using AHP and Compromise Programming Techniques
    Samal, Rajat Kanti
    Kansal, Mitthan Lal
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, POWER AND ENVIRONMENT: TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE GROWTH (ICEPE), 2015,
  • [28] Liability Factors and Conceptual Framework for Contracts to Manage Design for Digital Fabrication in Construction Projects
    Ng, Ming Shan
    Hall, Daniel Mark
    Hsieh, Shang-Hsien
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [29] Identifying key factors for coral survival in reef restoration projects using deep learning
    Morand, Gaetan
    Dixon, Simon
    Le Berre, Thomas
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2022, 32 (11) : 1758 - 1773
  • [30] IDENTIFYING THE FACTORS INFLUENCING NEW PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT USING THE MODULAR PRODUCT PLATFORM IN THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY
    Doctoran, Amir Hossain
    Manteghi, Manouchehr
    Valmohammadi, Changiz
    Rabiei, Mahnaz
    INGINERIA AUTOMOBILULUI, 2020, (56): : 15 - 19