Impact of bowel preparation type on the quality of colonoscopy: a multicenter community-based study

被引:10
|
作者
Martin, Daniel [1 ]
Walayat, Saqib [1 ]
Ahmed, Zohair [2 ]
Dhillon, Sonu [1 ]
Asche, Carl V. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Puli, Srinivas [1 ]
Ren, Jinma [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] OSF St Francis Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Peoria, IL USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Peoria, IL 61656 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Ctr Outcomes Res, Peoria, IL 61656 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Syst Outcomes & Policy, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
sodium sulfate; polyethylene glycol; bowel prep; colonoscopy;
D O I
10.3402/jchimp.v6.31074
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: High-quality bowel preparation is crucial for achieving the goals of colonoscopy. However, choosing a bowel preparation in clinical practice can be challenging because of the many formulations. This study aims to assess the impact the type of bowel preparation on the quality of colonoscopy in a community hospital setting. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted utilizing a colonoscopy screening/surveillance database in central Illinois during the period of January 1, 2010, to March 31, 2014. Patients without bowel preparation assessment were excluded from this study. Controlling for the confounders, generalized linear models were used to estimate the adjusted impact [odds ratio (OR)] of bowel preparation type on the quality of preparation (excellent, good, fair, and poor), and on the detection of advanced adenoma. The association between the time of withdrawal after insertion and the quality of preparation was also examined using a linear model. Results: A total of 28,368 colonoscopies; half the patients were male, and the average age was 61 +/- 9 years. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) was used in the majority (70.2%) of bowel preparations, followed by sodium sulfate (21.4%), sodium phosphate (2.5%), magnesium sulfate (0.4%), and others. Compared with PEG, magnesium sulfate had a poorer quality of bowel preparations (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9; p < 0.05), whereas the quality of bowel preparation was significantly improved by using sodium sulfate (OR = 5.7, 95% CI 5.4-6.1; p < 0.001) and sodium phosphate (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.8-2.5; p < 0.001). For those who had adequate bowel preparation, the better quality of preparation significantly increased the detection rate of advanced adenoma (5.0, 3.6, and 2.9% for excellent, good, and fair, respectively). Conclusion: When possible, sodium sulfate-based preparations should be recommended in the community setting for colonoscopy because of their high quality of bowel preparation.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation on Intestinal Microbiota
    O'Brien, Claire L.
    Allison, Gwen E.
    Grimpen, Florian
    Pavli, Paul
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (05):
  • [42] Impact of colonoscopy bowel preparation on intestinal microbiota
    Grimpen, F. M.
    O'Brien, C. L.
    Allison, G. E.
    Pavli, P.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 23 : A220 - A220
  • [43] Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and costs of colonoscopy
    Rex, D
    Latinovich, D
    Liangpunsakul, S
    Brachter, L
    Imperiale, T
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 53 (05) : AB183 - AB183
  • [44] Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy
    Rex, DK
    Imperiale, TF
    Latinovich, DR
    Bratcher, LL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (07): : 1696 - 1700
  • [45] Impact of nasal obstruction on sleep quality: a community-based study of women
    Caroline Bengtsson
    Lars Jonsson
    Mats Holmström
    Malin Svensson
    Jenny Theorell-Haglöw
    Eva Lindberg
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2015, 272 : 97 - 103
  • [46] Impact of nasal obstruction on sleep quality: a community-based study of women
    Bengtsson, Caroline
    Jonsson, Lars
    Holmstrom, Mats
    Svensson, Malin
    Theorell-Haglow, Jenny
    Lindberg, Eva
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 272 (01) : 97 - 103
  • [47] Patient Perception of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy Is Associated With the Quality of Preparation
    Holt, Edward W.
    Yimam, Kidist
    Ma, Hanley
    Shaw, Richard E.
    Sundberg, Richard
    Verhille, Michael S.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (04) : 506 - 506
  • [48] Quality optimisation in colonoscopy- a function of timing of colonoscopy or bowel preparation?
    Khan, K. S.
    McIlveen, E.
    Modak, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 : 83 - 83
  • [49] Impact of Colonoscopy Preparation Video on Boston Bowel Preparation Score
    Ho, Loan
    Montealegre, Jane
    Al-Arabi, Safa'a
    Jibaja-Weiss, Maria
    Suarez, Milena Gould
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 112 : S138 - S139
  • [50] Predictors of bowel preparation quality for colonoscopy and assessment of its impact on colonic lesion detection
    Harewood, GC
    Sharma, VK
    De Garmo, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (09): : S240 - S240