Impact of bowel preparation type on the quality of colonoscopy: a multicenter community-based study

被引:10
|
作者
Martin, Daniel [1 ]
Walayat, Saqib [1 ]
Ahmed, Zohair [2 ]
Dhillon, Sonu [1 ]
Asche, Carl V. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Puli, Srinivas [1 ]
Ren, Jinma [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] OSF St Francis Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Peoria, IL USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Peoria, IL 61656 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Ctr Outcomes Res, Peoria, IL 61656 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Syst Outcomes & Policy, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
sodium sulfate; polyethylene glycol; bowel prep; colonoscopy;
D O I
10.3402/jchimp.v6.31074
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: High-quality bowel preparation is crucial for achieving the goals of colonoscopy. However, choosing a bowel preparation in clinical practice can be challenging because of the many formulations. This study aims to assess the impact the type of bowel preparation on the quality of colonoscopy in a community hospital setting. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted utilizing a colonoscopy screening/surveillance database in central Illinois during the period of January 1, 2010, to March 31, 2014. Patients without bowel preparation assessment were excluded from this study. Controlling for the confounders, generalized linear models were used to estimate the adjusted impact [odds ratio (OR)] of bowel preparation type on the quality of preparation (excellent, good, fair, and poor), and on the detection of advanced adenoma. The association between the time of withdrawal after insertion and the quality of preparation was also examined using a linear model. Results: A total of 28,368 colonoscopies; half the patients were male, and the average age was 61 +/- 9 years. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) was used in the majority (70.2%) of bowel preparations, followed by sodium sulfate (21.4%), sodium phosphate (2.5%), magnesium sulfate (0.4%), and others. Compared with PEG, magnesium sulfate had a poorer quality of bowel preparations (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9; p < 0.05), whereas the quality of bowel preparation was significantly improved by using sodium sulfate (OR = 5.7, 95% CI 5.4-6.1; p < 0.001) and sodium phosphate (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.8-2.5; p < 0.001). For those who had adequate bowel preparation, the better quality of preparation significantly increased the detection rate of advanced adenoma (5.0, 3.6, and 2.9% for excellent, good, and fair, respectively). Conclusion: When possible, sodium sulfate-based preparations should be recommended in the community setting for colonoscopy because of their high quality of bowel preparation.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Randomized Prospective Study: Impact of the Patient Education Website on the Quality of Outpatient Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
    Suzuki, Matthew M.
    Bardi, Mohammad
    Takach, Oliver
    Galorport, Cherry
    Yonge, Jordan
    Harris, Natasha
    Ko, Hin Hin
    Telford, Jennifer J.
    Lam, Eric
    Rosenfeld, Gregory
    Enns, Robert A.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (05) : AB214 - AB215
  • [22] Randomized Prospective Study: Impact of the Patient Education Website on the Quality of Outpatient Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
    Suzuki, Matthew M.
    Bardi, Mohammad
    Takach, Oliver
    Galorport, Cherry
    Yonge, Jordan
    Harris, Natasha
    Lam, Eric
    Telford, Jennifer J.
    Rosenfeld, Greg
    Ko, Hin Hin
    Enns, Robert A.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB170 - AB171
  • [23] Augmented Miralax Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: An Assessment of Quality of Bowel Preparation
    Flynn, Duncan J.
    Ha, Jasmine
    Li, Xing
    Koehn, Madeline
    Palchaudhuri, Sonali
    Richter, James
    Singh, Amandeep
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : S557 - S558
  • [24] Quality optimisation in colonoscopy: a function of time of colonoscopy or bowel preparation
    Abudeeb, Haytham
    Khan, Khurram
    Maung, Min
    Malcomson, Lee
    Brown, Alistair
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 32
  • [25] Lunar Effect on Quality of Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation
    Dam, Tanya
    Moise, Duane
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 : S596 - S596
  • [26] Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Tae, Jae Woong
    Lee, Jong Chan
    Hong, Su Jin
    Han, Jae Pil
    Lee, Yun Hee
    Chung, Jong Ho
    Yoon, Hyung Geun
    Ko, Bong Min
    Cho, Joo Young
    Lee, Joon Seong
    Lee, Moon Sung
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 76 (04) : 804 - 811
  • [27] Influence of the Timing of Colonoscopy on the Bowel Preparation Quality
    Abu Ghanimeh, Mouhanna
    Arora, Simran
    Kaddourah, Osama
    Shobassy, Mazen
    Sekhon, Ajay
    Junna, Shilpa
    Abuamr, Khalil
    Yousef, Osama
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 : S130 - S130
  • [28] Bowel preparation: The basis for quality colonoscopy in geriatrics
    Lee, Zhen Xi Joel
    Yew, Kuo Chao
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 33 : 254 - 254
  • [29] Factors influencing quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Romero, Ronald V.
    Mahadeva, Sanjiv
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 5 (02): : 39 - 46
  • [30] Prognostic factors for bowel preparation quality at colonoscopy
    Rakvit, A
    Arif, A
    Variyam, E
    Hodges, DS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 100 (09): : S347 - S347