Impact of bowel preparation type on the quality of colonoscopy: a multicenter community-based study

被引:10
|
作者
Martin, Daniel [1 ]
Walayat, Saqib [1 ]
Ahmed, Zohair [2 ]
Dhillon, Sonu [1 ]
Asche, Carl V. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Puli, Srinivas [1 ]
Ren, Jinma [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] OSF St Francis Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Peoria, IL USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Peoria, IL 61656 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Ctr Outcomes Res, Peoria, IL 61656 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Syst Outcomes & Policy, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
sodium sulfate; polyethylene glycol; bowel prep; colonoscopy;
D O I
10.3402/jchimp.v6.31074
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: High-quality bowel preparation is crucial for achieving the goals of colonoscopy. However, choosing a bowel preparation in clinical practice can be challenging because of the many formulations. This study aims to assess the impact the type of bowel preparation on the quality of colonoscopy in a community hospital setting. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted utilizing a colonoscopy screening/surveillance database in central Illinois during the period of January 1, 2010, to March 31, 2014. Patients without bowel preparation assessment were excluded from this study. Controlling for the confounders, generalized linear models were used to estimate the adjusted impact [odds ratio (OR)] of bowel preparation type on the quality of preparation (excellent, good, fair, and poor), and on the detection of advanced adenoma. The association between the time of withdrawal after insertion and the quality of preparation was also examined using a linear model. Results: A total of 28,368 colonoscopies; half the patients were male, and the average age was 61 +/- 9 years. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) was used in the majority (70.2%) of bowel preparations, followed by sodium sulfate (21.4%), sodium phosphate (2.5%), magnesium sulfate (0.4%), and others. Compared with PEG, magnesium sulfate had a poorer quality of bowel preparations (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9; p < 0.05), whereas the quality of bowel preparation was significantly improved by using sodium sulfate (OR = 5.7, 95% CI 5.4-6.1; p < 0.001) and sodium phosphate (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.8-2.5; p < 0.001). For those who had adequate bowel preparation, the better quality of preparation significantly increased the detection rate of advanced adenoma (5.0, 3.6, and 2.9% for excellent, good, and fair, respectively). Conclusion: When possible, sodium sulfate-based preparations should be recommended in the community setting for colonoscopy because of their high quality of bowel preparation.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Factors Influencing the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
    Bearelly, Dilip
    Kottewar, Saket
    Chennamaneni, Venu
    Akbar, Syed
    Reddy, Jyotsna
    Ibdah, Jamal
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 107 : S606 - S606
  • [32] IMPACT OF AUTOMATED DIGITAL NAVIGATION PROGRAM ON BOWEL PREPARATION QUALITY AND PATIENT SATISFACTION FOR COLONOSCOPY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
    Kakkar, Sarthak
    Verma, Rajanshu
    Jara, Hallie
    Garg, Shashank
    Pfau, Andy
    Jaffe, Cera
    Patel, Shrawan
    Sharma, Virender
    Atreja, Ashish
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (06) : AB424 - AB425
  • [33] Quality in bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A prospective study in a district hospital in England
    Livette, Helen
    Haynes, Ruth
    Lim, Dennis Nyuk Fung
    Ahmad, Ishfaq
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 27 : 172 - 172
  • [34] Impact of simple, specific, verbal instructions on the quality of bowel preparation in hospitalized patients undergoing colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
    Triantafyllou, Konstantinos
    Gkolfakis, Paraskevas
    Skamnelos, Alexandros
    Diamantopoulou, Georgia
    Dagas, Athanasios
    Tziatzios, Georgios
    Thomopoulos, Konstantinos
    Potamianos, Spyros
    Christodoulou, Dimitrios
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2021, 09 (03) : E378 - E387
  • [35] Quality of Colonoscopy Prep in Inpatients versus Outpatients at a Community-based Hospital
    Ajayi, Tokunbo
    Richter, James
    Campbell, Emily
    Namias, Joshua
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 108 : S605 - S605
  • [36] Association between bowel habits and quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Lee, Dong-won
    Koo, Ja Seol
    Kang, Seonghee
    Kim, Seung Young
    Hyun, Jong Jin
    Jung, Sung Woo
    Yim, Hyung Joon
    Lee, Sang Woo
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (29)
  • [37] Impact of diet restriction on bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Nam, Seung-Joo
    Kim, Young Jin
    Keum, Bora
    Lee, Jae Min
    Kim, Seung Han
    Choi, Hyuk Soon
    Kim, Eun Sun
    Seo, Yeon Seok
    Jeen, Yoon Tae
    Lee, Hong Sik
    Chun, Hoon Jai
    Um, Soon Ho
    Kim, Chang Duck
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (41)
  • [38] Impact of bowel preparation on surveillance colonoscopy interval
    Singhal, Shashideep
    Virk, Muhammad Asif
    Momeni, Mojdeh
    Krishnaiah, Mahesh
    Anand, Sury
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 49 (07) : 885 - 890
  • [39] The interval of bowel preparation and colonoscopy: determining the quality of bowel cleansing
    Kim, Hyung Wook
    Choi, Cheol Woong
    Kang, Dae Hwan
    Park, Su Bum
    Song, Byeong Jun
    Kim, Dong Jun
    Kim, Su Jin
    Ji, Byoung Hoon
    Park, Seung Jei
    Koh, Kyung Won
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 28 : 42 - 43
  • [40] The Impact of Diet Liberalization on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
    Walter, James
    Patel, Apurva
    Matro, Rebecca
    Grosso, Rachael
    Sharpe, Alexis
    Katz, Leo
    Ritchie, Marianne
    Keith, Scott
    Broad, Louis
    Greenbaum, Linda
    Kozuch, Patricia
    Quirk, Daniel
    Sendecki, Jocelyn Andrel
    Daskalakis, Constatine
    Kedika, Ramalinga
    Kastenberg, David
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 108 : S162 - S162