Impact of bowel preparation type on the quality of colonoscopy: a multicenter community-based study

被引:10
|
作者
Martin, Daniel [1 ]
Walayat, Saqib [1 ]
Ahmed, Zohair [2 ]
Dhillon, Sonu [1 ]
Asche, Carl V. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Puli, Srinivas [1 ]
Ren, Jinma [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] OSF St Francis Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Peoria, IL USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Peoria, IL 61656 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Ctr Outcomes Res, Peoria, IL 61656 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Syst Outcomes & Policy, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
sodium sulfate; polyethylene glycol; bowel prep; colonoscopy;
D O I
10.3402/jchimp.v6.31074
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: High-quality bowel preparation is crucial for achieving the goals of colonoscopy. However, choosing a bowel preparation in clinical practice can be challenging because of the many formulations. This study aims to assess the impact the type of bowel preparation on the quality of colonoscopy in a community hospital setting. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted utilizing a colonoscopy screening/surveillance database in central Illinois during the period of January 1, 2010, to March 31, 2014. Patients without bowel preparation assessment were excluded from this study. Controlling for the confounders, generalized linear models were used to estimate the adjusted impact [odds ratio (OR)] of bowel preparation type on the quality of preparation (excellent, good, fair, and poor), and on the detection of advanced adenoma. The association between the time of withdrawal after insertion and the quality of preparation was also examined using a linear model. Results: A total of 28,368 colonoscopies; half the patients were male, and the average age was 61 +/- 9 years. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) was used in the majority (70.2%) of bowel preparations, followed by sodium sulfate (21.4%), sodium phosphate (2.5%), magnesium sulfate (0.4%), and others. Compared with PEG, magnesium sulfate had a poorer quality of bowel preparations (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9; p < 0.05), whereas the quality of bowel preparation was significantly improved by using sodium sulfate (OR = 5.7, 95% CI 5.4-6.1; p < 0.001) and sodium phosphate (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.8-2.5; p < 0.001). For those who had adequate bowel preparation, the better quality of preparation significantly increased the detection rate of advanced adenoma (5.0, 3.6, and 2.9% for excellent, good, and fair, respectively). Conclusion: When possible, sodium sulfate-based preparations should be recommended in the community setting for colonoscopy because of their high quality of bowel preparation.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of Bowel Preparation Type on the Quality of Colonoscopy
    Ren, Jinma
    Martin, Daniel
    Ragunathan, Karthik
    Asche, Carl
    Cashman, Michael D.
    Puli, Srinivas R.
    Dhillon, Sonu
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB320 - AB320
  • [2] The impact of additional oral preparation on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Lee, Yoo Jin
    Kim, Eun Soo
    Cho, Kwang Bum
    Park, Kyung Sik
    Kim, Kyeong Ok
    Lee, Hyun Suk
    Jung, Yun Jin
    Kim, Eun Young
    Jang, Byung Ik
    Yang, Chang Heon
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 33 : 163 - 163
  • [3] QUALITY OF BOWEL PREPARATION FOR COLONOSCOPY IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS: RESULTS OF THE MULTICENTER PROSPECTIVE PISCOPO STUDY
    Rotondano, G.
    Rispo, A.
    Bottiglieri, M. E.
    De Luca, L.
    Lamanda, R.
    Orsini, L.
    Bruzzese, D.
    Galloro, G.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2015, 47 : E75 - E75
  • [4] WHAT FACTORS AFFECT THE QUALITY OF BOWEL PREPARATION FOR COLONOSCOPY? A MULTICENTER PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
    Bruno, M.
    Rondonotti, E.
    Hassan, C.
    Fuccio, L.
    Pagano, N.
    Curcio, G.
    Dulbecco, P.
    Fabbri, C.
    Giordanino, C.
    Carrara, S.
    Della Casa, D.
    Maiero, S.
    Simone, A.
    Iacopini, F.
    Spada, C.
    Feliciangeli, G.
    Manes, G.
    Rogai, F.
    Repici, A.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2011, 43 : S119 - S120
  • [5] The Impact of Bowel Preparation on Other Colonoscopy Quality Indicators
    Butt, Shamaila
    Defoe, Hope
    Besherdas, Kalpesh
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (04) : 356 - 356
  • [6] STUDY OF QUALITY AND EFICACY OF BOWEL PREPARATION FOR COLONOSCOPY
    Chilkunda, D. S.
    Shah, S.
    GUT, 2013, 62 : A59 - A59
  • [7] THE IMPACT OF BOWEL PREPARATION ON OTHER COLONOSCOPY QUALITY INDICATORS
    Butt, S. K.
    Defoe, H.
    Besherdas, K.
    GUT, 2012, 61 : A378 - A378
  • [8] Impact of a Telephone Intervention on Bowel Preparation Quality for Colonoscopy in the Elderly
    Hu, Chun-Jiu
    Jiang, Lin-Yan
    Sun, Lin-Yin
    Hu, Chun-Yan
    Shi, Ke-Mei
    Bao, Zhen-Fei
    Zhou, Feng
    Xu, Lei
    Wang, Wei-Hong
    GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSING, 2021, 44 (02) : 92 - 97
  • [9] The impact of patient education on the quality of inpatient bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Rosenfeld, Greg
    Krygier, Darin
    Enns, Robert A.
    Singham, Janakie
    Wiesinger, Holly
    Bressler, Brian
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2010, 24 (09) : 543 - 546
  • [10] Impact of quality of bowel preparation on the detection of colonic polyps during colonoscopy: A prospective study
    Jain, Shaily
    Johnson, William D.
    Minocha, Anil
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 132 (04) : A315 - A315