Comparison of Monte Carlo with pencil beam dosimetry for lung CyberKnife SBRT, correlation with local recurrence

被引:1
|
作者
Ove, Roger [1 ]
Parker, Colbert A. [2 ]
Chilukuri, Madhu B. [1 ]
Russo, Suzanne M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Alabama, Mitchell Canc Inst, 1660 Springhill Ave, Mobile, AL 36604 USA
[2] Univ S Alabama, Coll Med, Mobile, AL 36604 USA
关键词
Radiation therapy; SBRT; Lung cancer; CyberKnife; Stereotactic; Radiotherapy; Monte Carlo;
D O I
10.1007/s13566-015-0185-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Object Promising results have been obtained using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage lung cancer. The calculation of dose in pulmonary parenchyma can be inaccurate. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 47 cases treated over a 2-year period with CyberKnife SBRT, planned with the standard pencil beam (PB) algorithm. Cases were a mixture of early-stage lung cancer and oligometastatic cases. The median prescribed dose was 50 Gy, in four or five fractions. We compared the planned dose with the dose actually delivered, as estimated with Monte Carlo (MC) dosimetry to the 1 % level. We correlated the dosimetric deficiencies with recurrences, using deformable registration to determine the dose delivered to the site of recurrence. Results With a median follow-up of 2 years, the local control at 1 year was 90 %, declining to 70 % at 2 years. The total number of local recurrences was 10, and 8 of these died with progressive disease. Two recurrences occurred synchronously with metastases, and 2 recurrences were in palliative cases treated to lesser doses with tight margins, and disease was never cleared locally. Monte Carlo calculations showed that the mean dose delivered to the planning target volume (PTV), averaged over all cases, was 7 % lower than planned. Most cases were planned with an expansion on the PTV (PTVmicro= GTV+ 8 mm expansion in the lung+ 3 mm) representing a region at risk for microscopic extension and intended to receive a minimum dose of 80 % of the prescription dose. Monte Carlo calculations showed that the minimum dose to this structure, averaged over all cases, was 47% lower than the intended dose. For cases that recurred, the mean dose to the PTVmicro was 8 % lower than intended, while only 2 % low for those controlled. There were no other significant differences in target coverage between patients with local control and local recurrence. The PB algorithm and MC estimates for pulmonary exposure were assessed, recording the V5, V10, and V20 for the ipsilateral and total lung volumes. These estimates roughly agreed for the two algorithms, with the MC results almost universally lower than PB, lower by an absolute 1-3 % on average. Conclusions Without the use of MC planning, target structures were substantially underdosed. Local failures were associated with PTVmicro undercoverage, which suggests delivering a therapeutic dose to this expanded microscopic disease target volume is beneficial. MC dosimetry is preferable for lung SBRT, while the PB algorithm was adequate for predicting pulmonary toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 263
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations
    Vanderstraeten, Barbara
    Reynaert, Nick
    Paelinck, Leen
    Madani, Indira
    De Wagter, Carlos
    De Gersem, Werner
    De Neve, Wilfried
    Thierens, Hubert
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (09) : 3149 - 3158
  • [22] A Comparison Between Pencil Beam Versus Monte Carlo Calculations in Arc Therapy
    Shin, H.
    Jung, J.
    Kim, M.
    Kay, C.
    Son, S.
    Kang, Y.
    Choi, B.
    Jang, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S710 - S710
  • [23] Dose Comparison between Proton Pencil Beam and Monte Carlo Dose Calculation Algorithm in Lung Cancer Patients
    Maes, D.
    Bowen, S. R.
    Fung, A.
    Saini, J.
    Bloch, C.
    Egan, A.
    Zeng, J.
    Rengan, R.
    Wong, T. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : E694 - E694
  • [24] Reported Clinical Outcomes in the Treatment of Monte Carlo-Based Lung SBRT Patients: Results of Heterogeneity Corrected Pencil Beam Vs X-Ray Voxel Monte Carlo Algorithms
    Pokhrel, D.
    Sood, S.
    Badkul, R.
    Jiang, H.
    Saleh, H.
    Wang, F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2962 - 2962
  • [25] Monte Carlo vs. Pencil Beam based optimization of stereotactic lung IMRT
    Marcin Sikora
    Jan Muzik
    Matthias Söhn
    Martin Weinmann
    Markus Alber
    Radiation Oncology, 4
  • [26] Monte Carlo vs. Pencil Beam based optimization of stereotactic lung IMRT
    Sikora, Marcin
    Muzik, Jan
    Soehn, Matthias
    Weinmann, Martin
    Alber, Markus
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2009, 4
  • [27] Comparison of Dose Calculation for Brain, Lung, Pelvis and Abdomen Targets with Monte Carlo Simulation and Eclipse Pencil Beam Algorithm
    Prusator, M.
    Muller, L.
    Ahmad, S.
    Chen, Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E261 - E262
  • [28] Electron fields in clinical use - a comparison of the pencil beam method and Monte Carlo code
    Treutwein, M.
    Bogner, L.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2006, 182 : 100 - 100
  • [29] Ray-Tracing and Monte Carlo dose calculation might lead to clinically relevant differences for Cyberknife lung SBRT
    Dechambre, D.
    Janvary, L.
    Jansen, N.
    Devillers, M.
    Baart, V.
    Cucchiaro, S.
    Ernst, C.
    Coucke, P.
    Gulyban, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S449 - S449
  • [30] SRS Dose Calculation Accuracy Comparison Between Pencil Beam and Monte Carlo Algorithms
    Stathakis, S.
    Defoor, D.
    Saenz, D.
    Kirby, N.
    Mavroidis, P.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3655 - 3655