Remote Monitoring for Implantable Defibrillators: A Nationwide Survey in Italy

被引:9
|
作者
Luzi, Mario [1 ]
De Simone, Antonio [2 ]
Leoni, Loira [3 ]
Amellone, Claudia [4 ]
Pisano, Ennio [5 ]
Favale, Stefano [6 ]
Iacoviello, Massimo [6 ]
Luise, Raffaele [7 ]
Bongiorni, Maria Grazia [8 ]
Stabile, Giuseppe [9 ]
La Rocca, Vincenzo [2 ]
Folino, Franco [3 ]
Capucci, Alessandro [1 ]
D'Onofrio, Antonio [10 ]
Accardi, Francesco [11 ]
Valsecchi, Sergio [11 ]
Buia, Gianfranco [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ospedali Riuniti, Azienda Osped, Cardiol Clin, Via Conca,71, I-60126 Ancona, Italy
[2] Clin San Michele, Maddaloni, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Azienda Osped, Padua, Italy
[4] Osped Civile Cirie, Cirie, Italy
[5] Vito Fazzi Hosp, Lecce, Italy
[6] Univ Bari, Bari, Italy
[7] Osped San Salvatore, Coppito, Italy
[8] Univ Hosp Pisa, Pisa, Italy
[9] Clin Mediterranea, Naples, Italy
[10] Azienda Osped Colli Monaldi, Naples, Italy
[11] Boston Sci, Milan, Italy
来源
关键词
implantable defibrillator; remote monitoring; follow-up;
D O I
10.2196/ijmr.2824
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Remote monitoring (RM) permits home interrogation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and provides an alternative option to frequent in-person visits. Objective: The Italia-RM survey aimed to investigate the current practice of ICD follow-up in Italy and to evaluate the adoption and routine use of RM. Methods: An ad hoc questionnaire on RM adoption and resource use during in-clinic and remote follow-up sessions was completed in 206 Italian implanting centers. Results: The frequency of routine in-clinic ICD visits was 2 per year in 158/206 (76.7%) centers, 3 per year in 37/206 (18.0%) centers, and 4 per year in 10/206 (4.9%) centers. Follow-up examinations were performed by a cardiologist in 203/206 (98.5%) centers, and by more than one health care worker in 184/206 (89.3%) centers. There were 137/206 (66.5%) responding centers that had already adopted an RM system, the proportion of ICD patients remotely monitored being 15% for single-and dual-chamber ICD and 20% for cardiac resynchronization therapy ICD. Remote ICD interrogations were scheduled every 3 months, and were performed by a cardiologist in 124/137 (90.5%) centers. After the adoption of RM, the mean time between in-clinic visits increased from 5 (SD 1) to 8 (SD 3) months (P<.001). Conclusions: In current clinical practice, in-clinic ICD follow-up visits consume a large amount of health care resources. The results of this survey show that RM has only partially been adopted in Italy and, although many centers have begun to implement RM in their clinical practice, the majority of their patients continue to be routinely followed-up by means of in-clinic visits.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 89
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
    Dilaveris, Polychronis
    Piotrowicz, Ryszard
    HELLENIC JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 55 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [2] Remote monitoring of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    De Filippo, Paolo
    Luzi, Mario
    D'Onofrio, Antonio
    Bongiorni, Maria Grazia
    Giammaria, Massimo
    Bisignani, Giovanni
    Menardi, Endrj
    Ferrari, Paola
    Bianchi, Valter
    Viani, Stefano
    Leidi, Cristina
    Lovecchio, Mariolina
    Valsecchi, Sergio
    Capucci, Alessandro
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 53 (03) : 373 - 381
  • [3] Remote Interrogation and Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
    George K. Joseph
    Bruce L. Wilkoff
    Thomas Dresing
    John Burkhardt
    Yaariv Khaykin
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2004, 11 : 161 - 166
  • [4] Remote monitoring of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    Paolo De Filippo
    Mario Luzi
    Antonio D’Onofrio
    Maria Grazia Bongiorni
    Massimo Giammaria
    Giovanni Bisignani
    Endrj Menardi
    Paola Ferrari
    Valter Bianchi
    Stefano Viani
    Cristina Leidi
    Mariolina Lovecchio
    Sergio Valsecchi
    Alessandro Capucci
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2018, 53 : 373 - 381
  • [5] Remote interrogation and monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    Joseph, GK
    Wilkoff, BL
    Dresing, T
    Burkhardt, J
    Khaykin, Y
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 11 (02) : 161 - 166
  • [6] Economic analysis of remote monitoring in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in the Trento area, Italy
    Marini, Massimiliano
    Videsott, Lodovica
    Dalle Fratte, Chiara Francesca
    Francesconi, Andrea
    Bonvicini, Eleonora
    Quintarelli, Silvia
    Martin, Marta
    Guarracini, Fabrizio
    Coser, Alessio
    Benetollo, Pier Paolo
    Bonmassari, Roberto
    Boriani, Giuseppe
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [7] Remote monitoring of implantable defibrillators: the impact on clinical workload
    Theuns, D. A. M. J.
    Rivero-Ayerza, M.
    Res, J. C. J.
    Knops, P.
    Jordaens, L. J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 29 : 640 - 640
  • [8] Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: A prospective analysis
    Schoenfeld, MH
    Compton, SJ
    Mead, RH
    Weiss, DN
    Sherfesee, L
    Englund, J
    Mongeon, LR
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 27 (06): : 757 - 763
  • [9] Assessment of a remote monitoring system for implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    Masella, Cristina
    Zanaboni, Paolo
    Di Stasi, Francesca
    Gilardi, Serena
    Ponzi, Patrizia
    Valsecchi, Sergio
    JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2008, 14 (06) : 290 - 294
  • [10] Initial experience in the remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    Affolter, J. T.
    Redfem, C.
    Patel, J. C.
    Lewis, A.
    Broadhurst, P. A.
    SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 53 (02) : 57 - 57