Remote monitoring of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators

被引:6
|
作者
De Filippo, Paolo [1 ]
Luzi, Mario [2 ]
D'Onofrio, Antonio [3 ]
Bongiorni, Maria Grazia [4 ]
Giammaria, Massimo [5 ]
Bisignani, Giovanni [6 ]
Menardi, Endrj [7 ]
Ferrari, Paola [1 ]
Bianchi, Valter [3 ]
Viani, Stefano [4 ]
Leidi, Cristina [1 ]
Lovecchio, Mariolina [8 ]
Valsecchi, Sergio [8 ]
Capucci, Alessandro [2 ]
机构
[1] Osped Papa Giovanni XXIII Hosp, Cardiac Electrophysiol & Pacing Unit, Piazza OMS 1, I-24127 Bergamo, Italy
[2] Marche Polytech Univ, Ancona, Italy
[3] Monaldi Hosp, Unita Operat Elettrofisiol Studio & Terapia Aritm, Naples, Italy
[4] Univ Hosp Pisa, Cardiothorac & Vasc Dept, Cardiol Div 2, Pisa, Italy
[5] Maria Vittoria Hosp, Turin, Italy
[6] Castrovillari Hosp, Div Cardiol, Cosenza, Italy
[7] SS Croce & Carle Hosp Cuneo, Cuneo, Italy
[8] Boston Sci, Milan, Italy
关键词
ICD; Subcutaneous; Remote monitoring; Sudden death; ICD; COMPLICATIONS; FREQUENCY; CONSENSUS; EFFICACY; INSIGHTS; DEVICES; SAFETY; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s10840-018-0459-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundRemote monitoring (RM) of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) has been shown to improve patient safety and reduce in-office visits. The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) is an effective alternative to transvenous ICD and has recently been endowed with the RM function. However, the RM communicator for S-ICD requires patient interaction to activate data transmission. We assessed patient compliance and acceptance.MethodsPatients with S-ICD received the communicator and were followed up for 15months. Weekly remote transmissions were programmed. Compliance with checks was measured as the number of checks performed by the patient divided by the number of automatic notifications by the communicator. A questionnaire on acceptance of the system was administered to patients.ResultsA total of 106 patients were analyzed. The proportion of weekly checks properly executed by the patients was 94% during the first 3months and 93% from months 12 to 15. Of the checks performed, 93% were on the same day as the automatic notification. On a patient basis, compliance with weekly checks was >85% (less than one check missed per month) in 88% of patients during the first 3months and in 82% from months 12 to 15 (p=0.615). No variables emerged as predictors of lower (85%) long-term compliance with weekly checks. During follow-up, 49 alerts were transmitted and the mean delay between the detected event and the patient transmission was 22days. The majority of patients found the system easy to use and felt confident about being remotely monitored.Conclusions<The level of patient compliance with remote checks is high with current technology for RM of S-ICD. The vast majority of data transmissions are consistently performed on a weekly basis on the day scheduled.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 381
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Remote monitoring of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    Paolo De Filippo
    Mario Luzi
    Antonio D’Onofrio
    Maria Grazia Bongiorni
    Massimo Giammaria
    Giovanni Bisignani
    Endrj Menardi
    Paola Ferrari
    Valter Bianchi
    Stefano Viani
    Cristina Leidi
    Mariolina Lovecchio
    Sergio Valsecchi
    Alessandro Capucci
    [J]. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2018, 53 : 373 - 381
  • [2] Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
    Dilaveris, Polychronis
    Piotrowicz, Ryszard
    [J]. HELLENIC JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 55 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [3] Remote Interrogation and Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
    George K. Joseph
    Bruce L. Wilkoff
    Thomas Dresing
    John Burkhardt
    Yaariv Khaykin
    [J]. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2004, 11 : 161 - 166
  • [4] Remote interrogation and monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    Joseph, GK
    Wilkoff, BL
    Dresing, T
    Burkhardt, J
    Khaykin, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 11 (02) : 161 - 166
  • [5] Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: A prospective analysis
    Schoenfeld, MH
    Compton, SJ
    Mead, RH
    Weiss, DN
    Sherfesee, L
    Englund, J
    Mongeon, LR
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 27 (06): : 757 - 763
  • [6] Assessment of a remote monitoring system for implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    Masella, Cristina
    Zanaboni, Paolo
    Di Stasi, Francesca
    Gilardi, Serena
    Ponzi, Patrizia
    Valsecchi, Sergio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2008, 14 (06) : 290 - 294
  • [7] Initial experience in the remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    Affolter, J. T.
    Redfem, C.
    Patel, J. C.
    Lewis, A.
    Broadhurst, P. A.
    [J]. SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 53 (02) : 57 - 57
  • [8] Subcutaneous Only Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
    Bardy, Gust H.
    Smith, Warren
    Hood, Margaret
    Grace, Andrew
    Crozier, Ian
    Melton, Iain
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (10) : A132 - A132
  • [9] Outcomes Associated With Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
    Wase, Abdul
    Aung, Thein T.
    Markert, Ronald J.
    [J]. JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 2 (08) : 925 - 925
  • [10] Remote monitoring and follow-up of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    Burri, Haran
    Senouf, David
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2009, 11 (06): : 701 - 709