Remote Monitoring for Implantable Defibrillators: A Nationwide Survey in Italy

被引:9
|
作者
Luzi, Mario [1 ]
De Simone, Antonio [2 ]
Leoni, Loira [3 ]
Amellone, Claudia [4 ]
Pisano, Ennio [5 ]
Favale, Stefano [6 ]
Iacoviello, Massimo [6 ]
Luise, Raffaele [7 ]
Bongiorni, Maria Grazia [8 ]
Stabile, Giuseppe [9 ]
La Rocca, Vincenzo [2 ]
Folino, Franco [3 ]
Capucci, Alessandro [1 ]
D'Onofrio, Antonio [10 ]
Accardi, Francesco [11 ]
Valsecchi, Sergio [11 ]
Buia, Gianfranco [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ospedali Riuniti, Azienda Osped, Cardiol Clin, Via Conca,71, I-60126 Ancona, Italy
[2] Clin San Michele, Maddaloni, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Azienda Osped, Padua, Italy
[4] Osped Civile Cirie, Cirie, Italy
[5] Vito Fazzi Hosp, Lecce, Italy
[6] Univ Bari, Bari, Italy
[7] Osped San Salvatore, Coppito, Italy
[8] Univ Hosp Pisa, Pisa, Italy
[9] Clin Mediterranea, Naples, Italy
[10] Azienda Osped Colli Monaldi, Naples, Italy
[11] Boston Sci, Milan, Italy
来源
关键词
implantable defibrillator; remote monitoring; follow-up;
D O I
10.2196/ijmr.2824
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Remote monitoring (RM) permits home interrogation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and provides an alternative option to frequent in-person visits. Objective: The Italia-RM survey aimed to investigate the current practice of ICD follow-up in Italy and to evaluate the adoption and routine use of RM. Methods: An ad hoc questionnaire on RM adoption and resource use during in-clinic and remote follow-up sessions was completed in 206 Italian implanting centers. Results: The frequency of routine in-clinic ICD visits was 2 per year in 158/206 (76.7%) centers, 3 per year in 37/206 (18.0%) centers, and 4 per year in 10/206 (4.9%) centers. Follow-up examinations were performed by a cardiologist in 203/206 (98.5%) centers, and by more than one health care worker in 184/206 (89.3%) centers. There were 137/206 (66.5%) responding centers that had already adopted an RM system, the proportion of ICD patients remotely monitored being 15% for single-and dual-chamber ICD and 20% for cardiac resynchronization therapy ICD. Remote ICD interrogations were scheduled every 3 months, and were performed by a cardiologist in 124/137 (90.5%) centers. After the adoption of RM, the mean time between in-clinic visits increased from 5 (SD 1) to 8 (SD 3) months (P<.001). Conclusions: In current clinical practice, in-clinic ICD follow-up visits consume a large amount of health care resources. The results of this survey show that RM has only partially been adopted in Italy and, although many centers have begun to implement RM in their clinical practice, the majority of their patients continue to be routinely followed-up by means of in-clinic visits.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 89
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING OF IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATORS: PATIENT SATISFACTION AND PREFERENCES FOR FOLLOW-UP
    Timmermans, Ivy
    Meine, Mathias
    Zitron, Edgar
    Mabo, Philippe
    Denollet, Johan
    Versteeg, Henneke
    PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2018, 80 (03): : A33 - A33
  • [42] The benefits of remote monitoring in long-term care for patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
    Osmera, Ondrej
    Bulava, Alan
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 35 : 40 - 48
  • [43] Remote monitoring and follow-ups of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the elderly patients
    Safarikova, I.
    Hajek, P.
    Bulava, A.
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2019, 74 (05) : 444 - 444
  • [44] A prospective comparison of remote monitoring systems in implantable cardiac defibrillators: potential effects of frequency of transmissions
    Ermenegildo de Ruvo
    Luigi Sciarra
    Anna Maria Martino
    Marco Rebecchi
    Renzo Venanzio Iulianella
    Francesco Sebastiani
    Alessandro Fagagnini
    Alessio Borrelli
    Antonio Scarà
    Domenico Grieco
    Claudia Tota
    Federica Stirpe
    Leonardo Calò
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2016, 45 : 81 - 90
  • [45] Usefulness of remote monitoring for the early detection of back-up mode in implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    Guedon-Moreau, Laurence
    Finat, Loic
    Klein, Cedric
    Kouakam, Claude
    Marquie, Christelle
    Klug, Didier
    Potelle, Charlotte
    Ninni, Sandro
    Brigadeau, Francois
    Mirabel, Xavier
    Lacroix, Dominique
    ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2021, 114 (04) : 287 - 292
  • [46] Automatic home monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
    Kottkamp, Hans
    Zabel, Markus
    Aliot, Etienne
    Kreutzer, Ulrich
    Bauer, Alexander
    Schuchert, Andreas
    Neuser, Hans
    Schumacher, Burghard
    Schmidinger, Herwig
    Stix, Guenter
    Clementy, Jacques
    Danilovic, Dejan
    Hindricks, Gerhard
    EUROPACE, 2008, 10 (06): : 729 - 735
  • [47] Sedation and monitoring for gastrointestinal endoscopy: A nationwide web survey in Italy
    Fanti, Lorella
    Agostoni, Massimo
    Gemma, Marco
    Radaelli, Franco
    Conigliaro, Rita
    Beretta, Luigi
    Rossi, Gemma
    Guslandi, Mario
    Testoni, Pier Alberto
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2011, 43 (09) : 726 - 730
  • [48] AUTOMATIC IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATORS - MONITORING RESULTS
    KOCHS, M
    EGGELING, T
    OSTERSPEY, A
    HANNEKUM, A
    HOPP, HW
    HOMBACH, V
    DALICHAU, H
    HILGER, HH
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 1987, 76 : 22 - 22
  • [49] Monitoring cellular activity with implantable pacemaker and defibrillators
    Lawo, T
    Lemke, B
    Barmeyer, J
    Lang, V
    Schaldach, M
    Rossada, B
    Laczkovics, A
    PACEMAKER LEADS 1997, 1997, : 59 - 63
  • [50] Remote monitoring of implantable defibrillators is associated with fewer inappropriate shocks and reduced time to medical assessment in a remote and rural area
    Callum, Kara
    Graune, Claudia
    Bowman, Elizabeth
    Molden, Edward
    Leslie, Stephen J.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 13 (03): : 46 - 54