Variance models for project financial risk analysis with applications to greenfield BOT highway projects

被引:27
|
作者
Chiara, Nicola [1 ]
Garvin, Michael J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Civil Engn & Engn Mech, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Myers Lawson Sch Construct, Blacksburg, VA USA
关键词
Build-operate-transfer; Monte Carlo simulation; risk analysis; stochastic models;
D O I
10.1080/01446190802259027
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Assessment of BOT project financial risk is generally performed by combining Monte Carlo simulation with discounted cash flow analysis. The outcomes of this risk assessment depend, to a significant extent, upon the total project uncertainty, which aggregates aleatory and epistemic uncertainties of key risk variables. Unlike aleatory uncertainty, modelling epistemic uncertainty is a rather difficult endeavour. In fact, BOT epistemic uncertainty may vary according to the significant information disclosed during the concession period. Two properties generally characterize the stochastic behaviour of the uncertainty of BOT epistemic variables: (1) the learning property and (2) the increasing uncertainty property. A new family of Markovian processes, the Martingale variance model and the general variance model, are proposed as an alternative modelling tool for BOT risk variables. Unlike current stochastic models, the proposed models can be adapted to incorporate a risk analyst's view of properties (1) and (2). A case study, a hypothetical BOT transportation project, illustrates that failing to properly model a project's epistemic uncertainty may lead to a biased estimate of the project's financial risk. The variance models may support, guide and extend the thinking process of risk analysts who face the challenging task of representing subjective assessments of key risk factors.
引用
收藏
页码:925 / 939
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Study of risk management of private enterprises' involvement in BOT projects: a case study of a sludge treatment project
    Sheng, H. (shenghetai@tsinghua.org.cn), 1600, Editorial Office of China Civil Engineering Journal (45):
  • [22] Modelling completion risk using stochastic critical path-envelope method: a BOT highway project application
    Kokkaew, Nakhon
    Chiara, Nicola
    CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2010, 28 (12) : 1239 - 1254
  • [23] Impact of Correlation on Cost-Risk Analysis for Construction Highway Projects
    Tran, Dai
    Bypaneni, Sai
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2016: OLD AND NEW CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES CONVERGE IN HISTORIC SAN JUAN, 2016, : 668 - 678
  • [24] Markowitz revisited: Mean-variance models in financial portfolio analysis
    Steinbach, MC
    SIAM REVIEW, 2001, 43 (01) : 31 - 85
  • [25] Application study of project financial risk analysis of giant hydropower project
    Wang, Zhenqiang
    Zhong, Denghua
    Shuili Fadian Xuebao/Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2004, 23 (05):
  • [26] THE LIFE CYCLE INTEGRATED RISK ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF INVESTMENT IN BOT METRO PROJECT
    Mao, Yihua
    Xiang, Jianguo
    Cheng, Yanhong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 38TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 2415 - 2422
  • [27] Mixtures of autoregressive models for financial risk analysis
    Suárez, A
    ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS - ICANN 2002, 2002, 2415 : 1186 - 1191
  • [28] Public Private Partnership Project Performance Analysis Compared to Design-Build in Highway Projects
    Fathi, Medya
    Shrestha, Pramen P.
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 148 (11)
  • [29] The applications of risk analysis in the comprehensive evaluation of construction projects
    Ma, Tong Tao
    Li, Cun Bin
    Proceedings of CRIOCM 2006 International Research Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, Vols 1 and 2, 2006, : 448 - 453
  • [30] An analysis of IT applications in construction project risk management
    Sun, CS
    Gu, GC
    Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Construction & Real Estate Management, Vols 1 and 2: CHALLENGE OF INNOVATION IN CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE, 2005, : 766 - 768