Probabilistic Evaluation of SMS Messages as Forensic Evidence: Likelihood Ratio Based Approach with Lexical Features

被引:4
|
作者
Ishihara, Shunichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Culture Hist & Language, Dept Linguist, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
Calibration; Forensic Text Comparison; Likelihood Ratios (LRs); Log-Likelihood-Ratio Cost; Multivariate Kernel Density; Short Message Service (SMS) Messages;
D O I
10.4018/jdcf.2012070104
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This study is one of the first likelihood ratio-based forensic text comparison studies in forensic authorship analysis. The likelihood-ratio-based evaluation of scientific evidence has started being adopted in many disciplines of forensic evidence comparison sciences, such as DNA, handwriting, fingerprints, footwear, voice recording, etc., and it is largely accepted that this is the way to ensure the maximum accountability and transparency of the process. Due to its convenience and low cost, short message service (SMS) has been a very popular medium of communication for quite some time. Unfortunately, however, SMS messages are sometimes used for reprehensible purposes, e.g., communication between drug dealers and buyers, or in illicit acts such as extortion, fraud, scams, hoaxes, and false reports of terrorist threats. In this study, the author performs a likelihood-ratio-based forensic text comparison of SMS messages focusing on lexical features. The likelihood ratios (LRs) are calculated in Aitken and Lucy's (2004) multivariate kernel density procedure, and are calibrated. The validity of the system is assessed based on the magnitude of the LRs using the log-likelihood-ratio cost (C-llr). The strength of the derived LRs is graphically presented in Tippett plots. The results of the current study are compared with those of previous studies.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 57
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: Response to Fenton et al.
    Biedermann, Alex
    Hicks, Tacha
    Taroni, Franco
    Champod, Christophe
    Aitken, Colin
    [J]. SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2014, 54 (04) : 316 - 318
  • [22] Response to "On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: Response to Fenton et al"
    Fenton, Norman
    Lagnado, David
    Berger, Daniel
    Neil, Martin
    Hsu, Anne
    [J]. SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2014, 54 (04) : 319 - 320
  • [23] The robustness of a continuous likelihood approach to bayesian analysis of forensic glass evidence
    Curran, JM
    Buckleton, J
    Triggs, CM
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 104 (2-3) : 91 - 103
  • [24] Variation in likelihood ratios for forensic evidence evaluation of XTC tablets comparison
    Bolck, Annabel
    Alberink, Ivo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS, 2011, 25 (01) : 41 - 49
  • [25] An overview of evidence evaluation methods in forensic chemistry using likelihood ratios
    Ramos, Daniel
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 256
  • [26] Research on likelihood ratio evaluation method of fingerprint evidence based on parameter estimation method
    Li, Kang
    Han, Yishi
    Luo, Yaping
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCES RESEARCH, 2024, 9 (01)
  • [27] The likelihood-ratio framework and forensic evidence in court a response to R v T
    Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOF, 2012, 16 (01): : 1 - 29
  • [28] On modelling non-probabilistic uncertainty in the likelihood ratio approach to evidential reasoning
    Keppens J.
    [J]. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2014, 22 (3) : 239 - 290
  • [29] Evaluation of direct and indirect ethanol biomarkers using a likelihood ratio approach to identify chronic alcohol abusers for forensic purposes
    Alladio, Eugenio
    Martyna, Agnieszka
    Salomone, Alberto
    Pirro, Valentina
    Vincenti, Marco
    Zadora, Grzegorz
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 271 : 13 - 22
  • [30] A measure of evidence based on the likelihood-ratio statistics
    Alexandre Galvão Patriota
    [J]. Statistical Papers, 2022, 63 : 1931 - 1951