On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: Response to Fenton et al.

被引：7
|
作者：
Biedermann, Alex [1 ,4 ]
Hicks, Tacha [1 ]
Taroni, Franco [1 ]
Champod, Christophe [1 ]
Aitken, Colin [2 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Lausanne, Ecole Sci Criminelles, Inst Police Sci, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Math, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Maxwell Inst, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Ca Foscari Venezia, Dept Econ, I-30121 Venice, Italy
来源：
SCIENCE & JUSTICE | 2014年 / 54卷 / 04期
关键词：
PROPOSITIONS; HIERARCHY; DNA;
D O I：
10.1016/j.scijus.2014.04.001
中图分类号：
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号：
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要：
This letter to the Editor comments on the article When 'neutral' evidence still has probative value (with implications from the Bony George Case) by N. Fenton et al. [[1], 2014]. (C) 2014 The Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：316 / 318
页数：3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Response to "On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: Response to Fenton et al"
    Fenton, Norman
    Lagnado, David
    Berger, Daniel
    Neil, Martin
    Hsu, Anne
    [J]. SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2014, 54 (04) : 319 - 320
  • [2] The use of likelihood ratios and odds ratios by Sawhney et al.
    Bansal, Chhavi
    Schwartz, Mark D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 (10): : 2350 - 2350
  • [3] In response to Murphy et al., Lower et al., and Lan et al.
    Conrad, B
    [J]. CELL, 1998, 95 (01) : 16 - 16
  • [4] Response to Rowland et al. and Achour et al.
    Pridgeon, Chris S.
    Johansson, Inger
    Ingelman-Sundberg, Magnus
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 112 (06) : 1155 - 1155
  • [5] Response to Pederson et al. and Chlebowski et al.
    Cold, Soren
    Cold, Frederik
    Jensen, Maj-Britt
    Cronin-Fenton, Deirdre
    Christiansen, Peer
    Ejlertsen, Bent
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2023, 115 (02) : 229 - 230
  • [6] In Response to Morgan et al. and Li et al.
    Goldberg, M.
    McGale, P.
    Whelan, T. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 115 (04): : 1012 - 1013
  • [7] Response to Gould et al. and Vincelli et al.
    [J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2017, 35 (4) : 306 - 308
  • [8] Juror understanding of the weight of evidence presented as a likelihood ratio and the impact on the deliberative process: a response to Buckleton, et al.
    Stiffelman, Bess
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2021, 51
  • [9] Conflict, error likelihood, and RT: Response to Brown & Yeung et al.
    Grinband, Jack
    Savitskaya, Judith
    Wager, Tor D.
    Teichert, Tobias
    Ferrera, Vincent P.
    Hirsch, Joy
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 57 (02) : 320 - 322
  • [10] Correspondence on Lovell et al.: response to Bornelv et al.
    Lovell, Peter V.
    Mello, Claudio V.
    [J]. GENOME BIOLOGY, 2017, 18
12345