Response to "On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: Response to Fenton et al"

被引：1
|
作者：
Fenton, Norman [1 ]
Lagnado, David [2 ]
Berger, Daniel [1 ]
Neil, Martin [1 ]
Hsu, Anne [1 ]
机构：
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Elect Engn & Comp Sci, London E1 4NS, England
[2] UCL, Dept Expt Psychol, London WC1E 6BT, England
来源：
SCIENCE & JUSTICE | 2014年 / 54卷 / 04期
基金：
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词：
D O I：
10.1016/j.scijus.2014.05.005
中图分类号：
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号：
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：319 / 320
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: Response to Fenton et al.
    Biedermann, Alex
    Hicks, Tacha
    Taroni, Franco
    Champod, Christophe
    Aitken, Colin
    [J]. SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2014, 54 (04) : 316 - 318
  • [2] The likelihood-ratio framework and forensic evidence in court a response to R v T
    Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOF, 2012, 16 (01): : 1 - 29
  • [3] Juror understanding of the weight of evidence presented as a likelihood ratio and the impact on the deliberative process: a response to Buckleton, et al.
    Stiffelman, Bess
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2021, 51
  • [4] Conflict, error likelihood, and RT: Response to Brown & Yeung et al.
    Grinband, Jack
    Savitskaya, Judith
    Wager, Tor D.
    Teichert, Tobias
    Ferrera, Vincent P.
    Hirsch, Joy
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 57 (02) : 320 - 322
  • [5] Peterson et al Response to Authors' Response
    Peterson, Brian L.
    Gill, James
    Oliver, William
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2021, 66 (06) : 2549 - 2552
  • [6] Authors' Response to Peterson et al Response
    Dror, Itiel E.
    Melinek, Judy
    Arden, Jonathan L.
    Kukucka, Jeff
    Hawkins, Sarah
    Carter, Joye
    Atherton, Daniel S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2021, 66 (06) : 2553 - 2553
  • [7] A response to Pellicano et al. response
    Walsh, Pat
    Elsabbagh, Mayada
    Bolton, Patrick
    Singh, Ilina
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 12 (12) : 770 - 770
  • [8] Authors' Response to Gill et al Response
    Dror, Itiel E.
    Melinek, Judy
    Arden, Jonathan L.
    Kukucka, Jeff
    Hawkins, Sarah
    Carter, Joye
    Atherton, Daniel S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2021, 66 (06) : 2559 - 2560
  • [9] Clarifying Sound and Suspect Use of the Rorschach in Forensic Mental Health Evaluations: A Response to Areh et al. (2022)
    de Ruiter, Corine
    Giromini, Luciano
    Meyer, Gregory J.
    King, Christopher M.
    Rubin, Benjamin A.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW, 2023, 16 (02): : 158 - 176
  • [10] Clarifying Sound and Suspect Use of the Rorschach in Forensic Mental Health Evaluations: A Response to Areh et al. (2022)
    Corine de Ruiter
    Luciano Giromini
    Gregory J. Meyer
    Christopher M. King
    Benjamin A. Rubin
    [J]. Psychological Injury and Law, 2023, 16 : 158 - 176
12345