Life cycle assessment of chemical agent resistant coatings

被引:0
|
作者
Stone K.R. [1 ]
Tolle D.A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl. Risk Mgmt. Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati
[2] Life Cycle Mgmt. Group, Battelle, 505 King Avenue, Columbus
关键词
CARC; Chemical agent resistant coatings; LCA; Department of defense; DoD method; chemical agent resistant coatings; Life-cycle impact assessment; Life-cycle improvement assessment;
D O I
10.1007/BF02978444
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Department of Defense (DoD) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have established a history of cooperation on a wide variety of pollution prevention research efforts, which apply the principles of Life- Cycle Engineering and Design (LCED) to DoD operations. DoD and EPA jointly sponsored this project, with funding from EPA and DoD's Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP), to focus on using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) principles for optimizing the process of painting military vehicles with chemical agent resistant coatings (CARC). The objectives were to identify environmental and energy burdens of the CARC painting life cycle, and to identify and test potential improvements on a life cycle basis. This LCA of CARC includes difficulties and lessons learned while conducting all three LCA components. The streamlined life-cycle inventory (LCI) involved quantification of environmental and energy burdens associated with the CARC life cycle. Based on the results of the LCI, a preliminary scoping of potential impacts, and a knowledge of alternative CARC painting materials and equipment, five alternatives for the application of CARC were identified. The life-cycle impact assessment (LCIA) of these applications used the equivalency method for impact characterization. The life-cycle improvement assessment (LCImA) results suggested that one application, based on combining an alternative primer and the turbine high- velocity, low-pressure (HVLP) spray painting system, should be subjected to test and evaluation. The LCIA gave this alternative the lowest environmental impact potential scores for seven of nine impact categories compared to the five other alternative systems evaluated. The preferred alternative was technically evaluated in the laboratory against the baseline CARC system using test panels painted at two Army bases. Preliminary results indicate that the preferred alternative performs equal or better than the baseline system at lower cost and with reduced environmental impact potential.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 11
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating toxicity impacts of local chemical emissions in Life Cycle Assessment
    Grazia Maria Cappucci
    Paolo Neri
    Anna Maria Ferrari
    Peter Fantke
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2024, 29 : 669 - 682
  • [42] Life Cycle Assessment for the Design of Chemical Processes, Products, and Supply Chains
    Kleinekorte, Johanna
    Fleitmann, Lorenz
    Bachmann, Marvin
    Kaetelhoen, Arne
    Barbosa-Povoa, Ana
    von der Assen, Niklas
    Bardow, Andre
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF CHEMICAL AND BIOMOLECULAR ENGINEERING, VOL 11, 2020, 11 (11): : 203 - 233
  • [43] Life cycle assessment
    Duda, M
    Shaw, JS
    SOCIETY, 1997, 35 (01) : 38 - 43
  • [44] Life cycle assessment
    Mark Duda
    Jane S. Shaw
    Society, 1997, 35 : 38 - 43
  • [45] Life cycle assessment
    Engineering (London), 2 (26):
  • [46] Life cycle assessment
    Teulon, Helene
    Boidot-Forget, Marc
    Epelly, Olivier
    Automotive Engineering International, 1995, 103 (12): : 49 - 51
  • [47] FT-IR characterization of chemical agent resistant coatings durability using disposable IR cards
    Patterson, P
    Lum, W
    SPECTROSCOPY, 1997, 12 (09) : 48 - 50
  • [48] Life cycle assessment in green chemistryA comparison of various industrial wood surface coatings
    Linda M. Gustafsson
    Pål Börjesson
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2007, 12 : 151 - 159
  • [49] Life cycle assessment in green chemistry -: A comparison of various industrial wood surface coatings
    Gustafsson, Linda M.
    Borjesson, Pal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2007, 12 (03): : 151 - 159
  • [50] The Polish Centre for Life Cycle Assessment—the centre for life cycle assessment in Poland
    Joanna Kulczycka
    Przemysław Kurczewski
    Jędrzej Kasprzak
    Anna Lewandowska
    Robert Lewicki
    Agata Witczak
    Joanna Witczak
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2011, 16 : 442 - 444