Life cycle assessment of chemical agent resistant coatings

被引:0
|
作者
Stone K.R. [1 ]
Tolle D.A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl. Risk Mgmt. Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati
[2] Life Cycle Mgmt. Group, Battelle, 505 King Avenue, Columbus
关键词
CARC; Chemical agent resistant coatings; LCA; Department of defense; DoD method; chemical agent resistant coatings; Life-cycle impact assessment; Life-cycle improvement assessment;
D O I
10.1007/BF02978444
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Department of Defense (DoD) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have established a history of cooperation on a wide variety of pollution prevention research efforts, which apply the principles of Life- Cycle Engineering and Design (LCED) to DoD operations. DoD and EPA jointly sponsored this project, with funding from EPA and DoD's Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP), to focus on using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) principles for optimizing the process of painting military vehicles with chemical agent resistant coatings (CARC). The objectives were to identify environmental and energy burdens of the CARC painting life cycle, and to identify and test potential improvements on a life cycle basis. This LCA of CARC includes difficulties and lessons learned while conducting all three LCA components. The streamlined life-cycle inventory (LCI) involved quantification of environmental and energy burdens associated with the CARC life cycle. Based on the results of the LCI, a preliminary scoping of potential impacts, and a knowledge of alternative CARC painting materials and equipment, five alternatives for the application of CARC were identified. The life-cycle impact assessment (LCIA) of these applications used the equivalency method for impact characterization. The life-cycle improvement assessment (LCImA) results suggested that one application, based on combining an alternative primer and the turbine high- velocity, low-pressure (HVLP) spray painting system, should be subjected to test and evaluation. The LCIA gave this alternative the lowest environmental impact potential scores for seven of nine impact categories compared to the five other alternative systems evaluated. The preferred alternative was technically evaluated in the laboratory against the baseline CARC system using test panels painted at two Army bases. Preliminary results indicate that the preferred alternative performs equal or better than the baseline system at lower cost and with reduced environmental impact potential.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 11
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Hardmetal Chemical Recycling Routes
    Aromaa, Riina
    Rinne, Marja
    Lundström, Mari
    ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering, 2022, 10 (31): : 10234 - 10242
  • [22] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Hardmetal Chemical Recycling Routes
    Aromaa, Riina
    Rinne, Marja
    Lundstroem, Mari
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (31): : 10234 - 10242
  • [23] A bright future for addressing chemical emissions in life cycle assessment
    Hauschild, Michael Z.
    Jolliet, Olivier
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2011, 16 (08): : 697 - 700
  • [24] Life cycle based alternatives assessment (LCAA) for chemical substitution
    Fantke, Peter
    Huang, Lei
    Overcash, Michael
    Griffing, Evan
    Jolliet, Olivier
    GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2020, 22 (18) : 6008 - 6024
  • [25] The evolution of life cycle assessment in pharmaceutical and chemical applications - a perspective
    Jimenez-Gonzalez, Concepcion
    Overcash, Michael R.
    GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2014, 16 (07) : 3392 - 3400
  • [26] Value creation with life cycle assessment: an approach to contextualize the application of life cycle assessment in chemical companies to create sustainable value
    Manda, B. M. Krishna
    Bosch, Henk
    Karanam, Sreepadaraj
    Beers, Heidi
    Bosman, Harrie
    Rietveld, Eelco
    Worrell, Ernst
    Patel, Martin K.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 126 : 337 - 351
  • [27] Assessment of Chemical Products and Processes: Green Metrics and Life Cycle Assessment - A Comparison
    Bloemer, Jan
    Maga, Daniel
    Roettgen, Janek
    Wu, Zhengxuan
    Hiebel, Markus
    Eilebrecht, Sebastian
    Jentsch, Sebastian
    Eggers, Natascha
    CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2024, 96 (05) : 561 - 574
  • [28] A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings
    Chau, C. K.
    Leung, T. M.
    Ng, W. Y.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 143 : 395 - 413
  • [29] Biotoxicity and life cycle assessment of two commercial antifouling coatings in marine systems
    Rossini, Paolo
    Napolano, Loredana
    Matteucci, Gabriele
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2019, 237
  • [30] Life-Cycle Assessment of Architectural Coatings Considering Different Preservative Scenarios
    Wieroniey, Tim
    COATINGSTECH, 2018, 15 (08): : 41 - 44