Life cycle assessment of chemical agent resistant coatings

被引:0
|
作者
Stone K.R. [1 ]
Tolle D.A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl. Risk Mgmt. Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati
[2] Life Cycle Mgmt. Group, Battelle, 505 King Avenue, Columbus
关键词
CARC; Chemical agent resistant coatings; LCA; Department of defense; DoD method; chemical agent resistant coatings; Life-cycle impact assessment; Life-cycle improvement assessment;
D O I
10.1007/BF02978444
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Department of Defense (DoD) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have established a history of cooperation on a wide variety of pollution prevention research efforts, which apply the principles of Life- Cycle Engineering and Design (LCED) to DoD operations. DoD and EPA jointly sponsored this project, with funding from EPA and DoD's Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP), to focus on using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) principles for optimizing the process of painting military vehicles with chemical agent resistant coatings (CARC). The objectives were to identify environmental and energy burdens of the CARC painting life cycle, and to identify and test potential improvements on a life cycle basis. This LCA of CARC includes difficulties and lessons learned while conducting all three LCA components. The streamlined life-cycle inventory (LCI) involved quantification of environmental and energy burdens associated with the CARC life cycle. Based on the results of the LCI, a preliminary scoping of potential impacts, and a knowledge of alternative CARC painting materials and equipment, five alternatives for the application of CARC were identified. The life-cycle impact assessment (LCIA) of these applications used the equivalency method for impact characterization. The life-cycle improvement assessment (LCImA) results suggested that one application, based on combining an alternative primer and the turbine high- velocity, low-pressure (HVLP) spray painting system, should be subjected to test and evaluation. The LCIA gave this alternative the lowest environmental impact potential scores for seven of nine impact categories compared to the five other alternative systems evaluated. The preferred alternative was technically evaluated in the laboratory against the baseline CARC system using test panels painted at two Army bases. Preliminary results indicate that the preferred alternative performs equal or better than the baseline system at lower cost and with reduced environmental impact potential.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 11
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life cycle assessment for spray coatings applied to the heating tubes of PFBC boiler
    Sonoya, K
    Kihara, S
    TETSU TO HAGANE-JOURNAL OF THE IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE OF JAPAN, 1997, 83 (01): : 78 - 83
  • [33] Linking chemical risk information with life cycle assessment in product development
    Askham, Cecilia
    Gade, Anne Lill
    Hanssen, Ole Jorgen
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 51 : 196 - 204
  • [34] Consequential life cycle assessment of kraft lignin recovery with chemical recycling
    Marson, Alessandro
    Samec, Joseph S. M.
    Manzardo, Alessandro
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 882
  • [35] Life cycle assessment for Ambrox® production from different chemical routes
    Ivan Martinez-Guido, Sergio
    Sengupta, Debalina
    Napoles-Rivera, Fabricio
    Betzabe Gonzalez-Campos, J.
    del Rio, Rosa E.
    Maria Ponce-Ortega, Jose
    El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 130 : 202 - 212
  • [36] Coupling life cycle assessment with process simulation for ecodesign of chemical processes
    Morales-Mendoza, Luis Fernando
    Azzaro-Pantel, Catherine
    Belaud, Jean-Pierre
    Ouattara, Adama
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2018, 37 (02) : 777 - 796
  • [37] Enhancing life cycle chemical exposure assessment through ontology modeling
    Meyer, David E.
    Bailin, Sidney C.
    Vallero, Daniel
    Egeghy, Peter P.
    Liu, Shi V.
    Hubal, Elaine A. Cohen
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 712
  • [38] Introduction of life cycle assessment and sustainability concepts in chemical engineering curricula
    Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro
    Rivera, Ximena C. Schmidt
    Stamford, Laurence
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 19 (03) : 442 - 458
  • [39] Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of Graphene Production by Ultrasonication and Chemical Reduction
    Arvidsson, Rickard
    Kushnir, Duncan
    Sanden, Bjorn A.
    Molander, Sverker
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (08) : 4529 - 4536
  • [40] Evaluating toxicity impacts of local chemical emissions in Life Cycle Assessment
    Cappucci, Grazia Maria
    Neri, Paolo
    Ferrari, Anna Maria
    Fantke, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (04): : 669 - 682