How well have CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future climate projections portrayed the recently observed warming

被引:0
|
作者
D. Carvalho
S. Rafael
A. Monteiro
V. Rodrigues
M. Lopes
A. Rocha
机构
[1] University of Aveiro,CESAM
[2] University of Aveiro,Department of Physics
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite the dire conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Reports in terms of global warming and its impacts on Earth’s climate, ecosystems and human society, a skepticism claiming that the projected global warming is alarmist or, at least, overestimated, still persists. Given the years passed since the future climate projections that served as basis for the IPCC 4th, 5th and 6th Assessment Reports were released, it is now possible to answer this fundamental question if the projected global warming has been over or underestimated. This study presents a comparison between CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future temperature projections and observations. The results show that the global warming projected by all CMIPs and future climate scenarios here analyzed project a global warming slightly lower than the observed one. The observed warming is closer to the upper level of the projected ones, revealing that CMIPs future climate scenarios with higher GHG emissions appear to be the most realistic ones. These results show that CMIPs future warming projections have been slightly conservative up to 2020, which could suggest a similar cold bias in their warming projections up to the end of the current century. However, given the short future periods here analyzed, inferences about warming at longer timescales cannot be done with confidence, since the models internal variability can play a relevant role on timescales of 20 years and less.
引用
下载
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Regional Climate Sensitivity of Climate Extremes in CMIP6 Versus CMIP5 Multimodel Ensembles
    Seneviratne, Sonia I.
    Hauser, Mathias
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2020, 8 (09)
  • [42] Evaluation of CMIP3 and CMIP5 Models over the Australian Region to Inform Confidence in Projections
    Moise, A.
    Wilson, L.
    Grose, M.
    Whetton, P.
    Watterson, I.
    Bhend, J.
    Bathols, J.
    Hanson, L.
    Erwin, T.
    Bedin, T.
    Heady, C.
    Rafter, T.
    AUSTRALIAN METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEANOGRAPHIC JOURNAL, 2015, 65 (01): : 19 - 53
  • [43] Projection of climate extremes in China, an incremental exercise from CMIP5 to CMIP6
    Zhu, Huanhuan
    Jiang, Zhihong
    Li, Laurent
    SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2021, 66 (24) : 2528 - 2537
  • [44] Contributions to Polar Amplification in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Hahn, L. C.
    Armour, K. C.
    Zelinka, M. D.
    Bitz, C. M.
    Donohoe, A.
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [45] A comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 projections for precipitation to observational data: the case of Northeastern Iran
    Yasin Zamani
    Seyed Arman Hashemi Monfared
    Mehdi Azhdari moghaddam
    Mohsen Hamidianpour
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2020, 142 : 1613 - 1623
  • [46] Future Changes in Wet and Dry Season Characteristics in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Simulations
    Wainwright, Caroline M.
    Black, Emily
    Allan, Richard P.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2021, 22 (09) : 2339 - 2357
  • [47] Present-day and future Amazonian precipitation in global climate models: CMIP5 versus CMIP3
    E. Joetzjer
    H. Douville
    C. Delire
    P. Ciais
    Climate Dynamics, 2013, 41 : 2921 - 2936
  • [48] Present-day and future Amazonian precipitation in global climate models: CMIP5 versus CMIP3
    Joetzjer, E.
    Douville, H.
    Delire, C.
    Ciais, P.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2013, 41 (11-12) : 2921 - 2936
  • [49] Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5
    Dufresne, J-L.
    Foujols, M-A.
    Denvil, S.
    Caubel, A.
    Marti, O.
    Aumont, O.
    Balkanski, Y.
    Bekki, S.
    Bellenger, H.
    Benshila, R.
    Bony, S.
    Bopp, L.
    Braconnot, P.
    Brockmann, P.
    Cadule, P.
    Cheruy, F.
    Codron, F.
    Cozic, A.
    Cugnet, D.
    de Noblet, N.
    Duvel, J-P.
    Ethe, C.
    Fairhead, L.
    Fichefet, T.
    Flavoni, S.
    Friedlingstein, P.
    Grandpeix, J-Y.
    Guez, L.
    Guilyardi, E.
    Hauglustaine, D.
    Hourdin, F.
    Idelkadi, A.
    Ghattas, J.
    Joussaume, S.
    Kageyama, M.
    Krinner, G.
    Labetoulle, S.
    Lahellec, A.
    Lefebvre, M-P.
    Lefevre, F.
    Levy, C.
    Li, Z. X.
    Lloyd, J.
    Lott, F.
    Madec, G.
    Mancip, M.
    Marchand, M.
    Masson, S.
    Meurdesoif, Y.
    Mignot, J.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2013, 40 (9-10) : 2123 - 2165
  • [50] Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5
    J.-L. Dufresne
    M.-A. Foujols
    S. Denvil
    A. Caubel
    O. Marti
    O. Aumont
    Y. Balkanski
    S. Bekki
    H. Bellenger
    R. Benshila
    S. Bony
    L. Bopp
    P. Braconnot
    P. Brockmann
    P. Cadule
    F. Cheruy
    F. Codron
    A. Cozic
    D. Cugnet
    N. de Noblet
    J.-P. Duvel
    C. Ethé
    L. Fairhead
    T. Fichefet
    S. Flavoni
    P. Friedlingstein
    J.-Y. Grandpeix
    L. Guez
    E. Guilyardi
    D. Hauglustaine
    F. Hourdin
    A. Idelkadi
    J. Ghattas
    S. Joussaume
    M. Kageyama
    G. Krinner
    S. Labetoulle
    A. Lahellec
    M.-P. Lefebvre
    F. Lefevre
    C. Levy
    Z. X. Li
    J. Lloyd
    F. Lott
    G. Madec
    M. Mancip
    M. Marchand
    S. Masson
    Y. Meurdesoif
    J. Mignot
    Climate Dynamics, 2013, 40 : 2123 - 2165