Projection of climate extremes in China, an incremental exercise from CMIP5 to CMIP6

被引:100
|
作者
Zhu, Huanhuan [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Zhihong [2 ,3 ]
Li, Laurent [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Joint Int Res Lab Climate & Environm Change, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Forecast & Evaluat Meteoro, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Key Lab Meteorol Disaster, Minist Educ, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[4] Sorbonne Univ, Lab Meteorol Dynam, Ecole Polytech, Ecole Normale Super,CNRS, F-75005 Paris, France
关键词
Climate extremes; Global warming targets; Climate model assessment; CMIP6-CMIP5; comparison; China regional climate; 1.5; DEGREES-C; GLOBAL WARMING TARGETS; PRECIPITATION EXTREMES; TEMPERATURE EXTREMES; INDEXES; 1.5-DEGREES-C; SENSITIVITY; FEEDBACKS; MODELS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.scib.2021.07.026
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This paper presents projections of climate extremes over China under global warming of 1.5, 2, and 3 degrees C above pre-industrial (1861-1900), based on the latest Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6) simulations. Results are compared with what produced by the precedent phase of the project, CMIP5. Model evaluation for the reference period (1985-2005) indicates that CMIP6 models outperform their predecessors in CMIP5, especially in simulating precipitation extremes. Areal averages for changes of most indices are found larger in CMIP6 than in CMIP5. The emblematic annual mean temperature, when averaged over the whole of China in CMIP6, increases by 1.49, 2.21, and 3.53 degrees C (relative to 1985-2005) for 1.5, 2, and 3 degrees C above-preindustrial global warming levels, while the counterpart in CMIP5 is 1.20, 1.93 and 3.39 degrees C respectively. Similarly, total precipitation increases by 5.3%, 8.6%, and 16.3% in CMIP6 and by 4.4%, 7.0% and 12.8% in CMIP5, respectively. The spatial distribution of changes for extreme indices is generally consistent in both CMIP5 and CMIP6, but with significantly higher increases in CMIP6 over Northeast and Northwest China for the hottest day temperature, and South China for the coldest night temperature. In the south bank of the Yangtze River, and most regions around 40 degrees N, CMIP6 shows higher increases for both total precipitation and heavy precipitation. The projected difference between CMIP6 and CMIP5 is mainly attributable to the physical upgrading of climate models and largely independent from their emission scenarios. (c) 2021 Science China Press. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science China Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:2528 / 2537
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uncertainty in Projection of Climate Extremes: A Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Zhang, Shaobo
    Chen, Jie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF METEOROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 35 (04) : 646 - 662
  • [2] Uncertainty in Projection of Climate Extremes: A Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Shaobo Zhang
    Jie Chen
    [J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2021, 35 : 646 - 662
  • [3] Uncertainty in Projection of Climate Extremes: A Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Shaobo ZHANG
    Jie CHEN
    [J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2021, 35 (04) : 646 - 662
  • [4] Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating climate extremes
    Chen, Huopo
    Sun, Jianqi
    Lin, Wenqing
    Xu, Huiwen
    [J]. SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2020, 65 (17) : 1415 - 1418
  • [5] Regional Climate Sensitivity of Climate Extremes in CMIP6 Versus CMIP5 Multimodel Ensembles
    Seneviratne, Sonia I.
    Hauser, Mathias
    [J]. EARTHS FUTURE, 2020, 8 (09)
  • [6] Projections of Greenland climate change from CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Zhang, Qinglin
    Huai, Baojuan
    Ding, Minghu
    Sun, Weijun
    Liu, Weigang
    Yan, Jinpei
    Zhao, Shuhui
    Wang, Yetang
    Wang, Yuzhe
    Wang, Lei
    Che, Jiahang
    Dou, Jiahui
    Kang, Limin
    [J]. GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2024, 232
  • [7] Decomposing Temperature Extremes Errors in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Di Luca, Alejandro
    Pitman, Andrew J.
    de Elia, Ramon
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (14)
  • [8] A comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate model projections for hydrological impacts in China
    Lei, Yawen
    Chen, Jie
    Xiong, Lihua
    [J]. HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 54 (03): : 330 - 347
  • [9] Climate Model Projections for Canada: A Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Sobie, S. R.
    Zwiers, F. W.
    Curry, C. L.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN, 2021, 59 (4-5) : 269 - 284
  • [10] The Mediterranean climate change hotspot in the CMIP5 and CMIP6 projections
    Cos, Josep
    Doblas-Reyes, Francisco
    Jury, Martin
    Marcos, Raul
    Bretonniere, Pierre-Antoine
    Samso, Margarida
    [J]. EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2022, 13 (01) : 321 - 340