Projections of Greenland climate change from CMIP5 and CMIP6

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Qinglin [1 ]
Huai, Baojuan [1 ]
Ding, Minghu [2 ]
Sun, Weijun [1 ]
Liu, Weigang [3 ]
Yan, Jinpei [4 ]
Zhao, Shuhui [5 ]
Wang, Yetang [1 ]
Wang, Yuzhe [1 ]
Wang, Lei [1 ]
Che, Jiahang [1 ]
Dou, Jiahui [1 ]
Kang, Limin [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Normal Univ, Coll Geog & Environm, Jinan, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, State Key Lab Severe Weather, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] China Meteorol Adm, Inst Arid Meteorol, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Minist Nat Resources, Inst Oceanog 3, Key Lab Global Change & Marine Atmospher Chem, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[5] Taishan Univ, Sch tourism, Tai An, Peoples R China
关键词
Greenland; CMIP; Projections; Climate Change; Temperature; Precipitation; EARTH SYSTEM MODEL; ICE-SHEET; MASS-LOSS; SCENARIO;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloplacha.2023.104340
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
As the Arctic continues to warm faster than the global average, the Greenland ice sheet faces a warmer future without restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions. In this study, 24 CMIP5 and 21 CMIP6 models were used to analyze projections of precipitation, 2 m or near-surface air temperature (T2m), and 500 hPa geopotential height (Z500) over Greenland under medium and high emission scenarios. The multi-model ensemble means indicate that CMIP6 is a warmer output with more precipitation in Greenland under medium and high emission scenarios relative to CMIP5. At the end of the 21st century (2071-2100), annual integrated precipitation in Greenland under RCP8.5 (SSP58.5) is projected to increase by 277.9 (281.3) Gt relative to the 1986-2005 climatological mean, with a significant positive trend of 38.5 (42.9) Gt/dec (p < 0.05) post-2020, approximately twice that under RCP4.5 (SSP24.5). Under high emission scenarios, T2m will steadily increase by 5.2 (5.7) C at the end of the 21st century and the northern amplifying effect of warming is more intense. In this context, northeast Greenland will increase the highest precipitation, with a trend of >30 mm/dec during 2020-2100. The Z500 rises higher from southeast to northwest Greenland due to global warming under medium and high emission scenarios. Model and scenario uncertainties are major sources of uncertainty at the end of the 21st century. Compared to CMIP5, the model uncertainty of CMIP6 decreases more but remained higher at the end of this century. The projections of northern Greenland are more reliable than those of other regions, with a lower total fractional uncertainty and a greater signal-to-noise ratio. Furthermore, we did not find an additional T2m increase due to internal variability. Under medium and high emission scenarios, Greenland near surface air warming is major owed to global warming. Considering the importance of current circulation anomalies and after removing the artificial increase in Z500, the decrease in Delta Z500 indicates that future warming has been underestimated under medium and high emission scenarios.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Mediterranean climate change hotspot in the CMIP5 and CMIP6 projections
    Cos, Josep
    Doblas-Reyes, Francisco
    Jury, Martin
    Marcos, Raul
    Bretonniere, Pierre-Antoine
    Samso, Margarida
    [J]. EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2022, 13 (01) : 321 - 340
  • [2] Climate Model Projections for Canada: A Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Sobie, S. R.
    Zwiers, F. W.
    Curry, C. L.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN, 2021, 59 (4-5) : 269 - 284
  • [3] Hydrological Projections under CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Wu, Yi
    Miao, Chiyuan
    Slater, Louise
    Fan, Xuewei
    Chai, Yuanfang
    Sorooshian, Soroosh
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 105 (01) : E2374 - E2389
  • [4] Analysing Urban Flooding Risk with CMIP5 and CMIP6 Climate Projections
    Oyelakin, Rafiu
    Yang, Wenyu
    Krebs, Peter
    [J]. WATER, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [5] A comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate model projections for hydrological impacts in China
    Lei, Yawen
    Chen, Jie
    Xiong, Lihua
    [J]. HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 54 (03): : 330 - 347
  • [6] Wind energy resource over Europe under CMIP6 future climate projections: What changes from CMIP5 to CMIP6
    Carvalho, D.
    Rocha, A.
    Costoya, X.
    DeCastro, M.
    Gomez-Gesteira, M.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 151
  • [7] Changes to population-based emergence of climate change from CMIP5 to CMIP6
    Douglas, Hunter C.
    Harrington, Luke J.
    Joshi, Manoj
    Hawkins, Ed
    Revell, Laura E.
    Frame, David J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [8] Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating climate extremes
    Chen, Huopo
    Sun, Jianqi
    Lin, Wenqing
    Xu, Huiwen
    [J]. SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2020, 65 (17) : 1415 - 1418
  • [9] Uncertainty in Projection of Climate Extremes: A Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Zhang, Shaobo
    Chen, Jie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF METEOROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 35 (04) : 646 - 662
  • [10] Uncertainty of ENSO-amplitude projections in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Beobide-Arsuaga, Goratz
    Bayr, Tobias
    Reintges, Annika
    Latif, Mojib
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2021, 56 (11-12) : 3875 - 3888