How well have CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future climate projections portrayed the recently observed warming

被引:0
|
作者
D. Carvalho
S. Rafael
A. Monteiro
V. Rodrigues
M. Lopes
A. Rocha
机构
[1] University of Aveiro,CESAM
[2] University of Aveiro,Department of Physics
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite the dire conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Reports in terms of global warming and its impacts on Earth’s climate, ecosystems and human society, a skepticism claiming that the projected global warming is alarmist or, at least, overestimated, still persists. Given the years passed since the future climate projections that served as basis for the IPCC 4th, 5th and 6th Assessment Reports were released, it is now possible to answer this fundamental question if the projected global warming has been over or underestimated. This study presents a comparison between CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future temperature projections and observations. The results show that the global warming projected by all CMIPs and future climate scenarios here analyzed project a global warming slightly lower than the observed one. The observed warming is closer to the upper level of the projected ones, revealing that CMIPs future climate scenarios with higher GHG emissions appear to be the most realistic ones. These results show that CMIPs future warming projections have been slightly conservative up to 2020, which could suggest a similar cold bias in their warming projections up to the end of the current century. However, given the short future periods here analyzed, inferences about warming at longer timescales cannot be done with confidence, since the models internal variability can play a relevant role on timescales of 20 years and less.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Uncertainty of ENSO-amplitude projections in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Goratz Beobide-Arsuaga
    Tobias Bayr
    Annika Reintges
    Mojib Latif
    Climate Dynamics, 2021, 56 : 3875 - 3888
  • [22] Uncertainty in Projection of Climate Extremes: A Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Shaobo ZHANG
    Jie CHEN
    Journal of Meteorological Research, 2021, 35 (04) : 646 - 662
  • [23] Comparison of Indian Ocean warming simulated by CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Li Jingyi
    Su Jingzhi
    ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2020, 13 (06) : 604 - 611
  • [24] How will southern hemisphere subtropical anticyclones respond to global warming? Mechanisms and seasonality in CMIP5 and CMIP6 model projections
    al Fahad, Abdullah
    Burls, Natalie J.
    Strasberg, Zachary
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2020, 55 (3-4) : 703 - 718
  • [25] Climate hazard indices projections based on CORDEX-CORE, CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensemble
    Erika Coppola
    Francesca Raffaele
    Filippo Giorgi
    Graziano Giuliani
    Gao Xuejie
    James M. Ciarlo
    Taleena Rae Sines
    José Abraham Torres-Alavez
    Sushant Das
    Fabio di Sante
    Emanuela Pichelli
    Russell Glazer
    Sebastian Karl Müller
    Sabina Abba Omar
    Moetasim Ashfaq
    Melissa Bukovsky
    E.-S. Im
    Daniela Jacob
    Claas Teichmann
    Armelle Remedio
    Thomas Remke
    Arne Kriegsmann
    Katharina Bülow
    Torsten Weber
    Lars Buntemeyer
    Kevin Sieck
    Diana Rechid
    Climate Dynamics, 2021, 57 : 1293 - 1383
  • [26] Robustness of Precipitation Projections in China:Comparison between CMIP5 and CMIP3 Models
    CHEN Huo-Po
    SUN Jian-Qi
    Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters, 2014, 7 (01) : 67 - 73
  • [27] How will southern hemisphere subtropical anticyclones respond to global warming? Mechanisms and seasonality in CMIP5 and CMIP6 model projections
    Abdullah al Fahad
    Natalie J. Burls
    Zachary Strasberg
    Climate Dynamics, 2020, 55 : 703 - 718
  • [28] Comparison of precipitation projections of CMIP5 and CMIP6 global climate models over Yulin, China
    Mohammed Sanusi Shiru
    Eun-Sung Chung
    Shamsuddin Shahid
    Xiao-jun Wang
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2022, 147 : 535 - 548
  • [29] Comparison of precipitation projections of CMIP5 and CMIP6 global climate models over Yulin, China
    Shiru, Mohammed Sanusi
    Chung, Eun-Sung
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    Wang, Xiao-jun
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 147 (1-2) : 535 - 548
  • [30] Climate hazard indices projections based on CORDEX-CORE, CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensemble
    Coppola, Erika
    Raffaele, Francesca
    Giorgi, Filippo
    Giuliani, Graziano
    Xuejie, Gao
    Ciarlo, James M.
    Sines, Taleena Rae
    Torres-Alavez, Jose Abraham
    Das, Sushant
    di Sante, Fabio
    Pichelli, Emanuela
    Glazer, Russell
    Mueller, Sebastian Karl
    Abba Omar, Sabina
    Ashfaq, Moetasim
    Bukovsky, Melissa
    Im, E. -S.
    Jacob, Daniela
    Teichmann, Claas
    Remedio, Armelle
    Remke, Thomas
    Kriegsmann, Arne
    Bulow, Katharina
    Weber, Torsten
    Buntemeyer, Lars
    Sieck, Kevin
    Rechid, Diana
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2021, 57 (5-6) : 1293 - 1383