Elevation of the d-dimer cut-off level might be applicable to rule out pulmonary embolism for active cancer patients in the emergency department

被引:0
|
作者
Hyojeong Kwon
Youn-Jung Kim
Eun-Ju Her
Bora Chae
Yoon-Seon Lee
机构
[1] Asan Medical Center,Department of Emergency Medicine
[2] University of Ulsan College of Medicine,undefined
来源
关键词
Pulmonary embolism; -dimer; Cancer; Diagnosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recent guidelines for diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism (PE) are based on clinical decision rules and d-dimer. d-dimer measurement is recommended only for patients who are ‘PE-unlikely’. We aimed to assess the current guidelines for cancer patients and to determine an optimal d-dimer cut-off level. This retrospective observational study was conducted in the emergency department of Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between 02/2017 and 09/2017 for the development cohort and between 06/2018 and 02/2019 for the validation cohort. Among adult active cancer patients with suspected PE, we included those who were ‘PE-unlikely’ according to Wells’ criteria and who underwent d-dimer testing and computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). A total of 498 patients (227 in the development cohort and 271 in the validation cohort) were included, and PE was diagnosed in 8.8% and 18.5% of patients, respectively. The optimal d-dimer cut-off level was 2.0 μg/mL. This elevated cut-off level showed a much higher specificity of 21.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.2–27.3%) and 21.7% (95% CI 16.8–7.6%) in the development and validation sets, respectively, compared with the specificity of 4.4% (95% CI 2.3–8.1%) and 4.1% (95% CI 2.2–7.6%) using the age-adjusted cut-off. The new d-dimer cut-off value identified unnecessary CTPA for 21.3% of patients (absolute difference, 16.9%, 35 of 207) in the development cohort and 21.7% (absolute difference, 17.6%, 39 of 221) of patients in the validation cohort compared to using the standard age-adjusted cut-off. The elevated d-dimer cut-off value combined with Wells’ criteria might reduce unnecessary CTPA in active cancer patients with a ‘PE-unlikely’ classification. Further clinical trials are warranted to improve the PE diagnostic strategy in cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 502
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Utility of D-dimer in predicting pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19 presenting to the emergency department
    Lemon, Natalie M.
    Taylor, Luke K.
    Rech, Megan A.
    Nguyen, Quang
    Matthews, Gregory J.
    Lew, George
    Lovett, Shannon
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS OPEN, 2024, 5 (04)
  • [42] Prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of the simplify D-dimer assay for pulmonary embolism in emergency department patients
    Kline, Jeffrey A.
    Runyon, Michael S.
    Webb, William B.
    Jones, Alan E.
    Mitchell, Alice M.
    CHEST, 2006, 129 (06) : 1417 - 1423
  • [43] Can the use of an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off value help in our diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism?
    Dutton, Jonathan
    Dachsel, Martin
    Crane, Rachel
    CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 18 (04) : 293 - 296
  • [44] Comparison of five D-dimer reagents and application of an age-adjusted cut-off for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in emergency department
    Mullier, Francois
    Vanpee, Dominique
    Jamart, Jacques
    Dubuc, Eric
    Bailly, Nicolas
    Douxfils, Jonathan
    Chatelain, Christian
    Dogne, Jean-Michel
    Chatelain, Bernard
    BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS, 2014, 25 (04) : 309 - 315
  • [45] Renal function-adapted D-dimer cutoffs in combination with a clinical prediction rule to exclude pulmonary embolism in patients presenting to the emergency department
    Flueckiger, Simon
    Ravioli, Svenja
    Buitrago-Tellez, Carlos
    Haidinger, Michael
    Lindner, Gregor
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 19 (05) : 1219 - 1227
  • [46] Should a normal D-dimer rule out angiographic pulmonary embolism or unfavorable outcome in patients left untreated?
    Michiels, JJ
    Perrier, A
    Bounameaux, H
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2001, 85 (04) : 753 - 753
  • [47] Age-Adjusted Cutoff D-Dimer Level to Rule Out Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Validation Cohort Study
    Fuchs, Eyal
    Asakly, Suwar
    Karban, Amir
    Tzoran, Inna
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 129 (08): : 872 - 878
  • [48] Prospective diagnostic accuracy assessment of the HemosIL HS D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism in emergency department patients
    Courtney, D. Mark
    Steinberg, Justin M.
    McCormick, Jennifer C.
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2010, 125 (01) : 79 - 83
  • [49] D-Dimer Assay-Guided Moderation of Adjusted Risk Score: Improving the Specificity of the D-Dimer for Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department
    Glober, N. K.
    Tainter, C. R.
    Brennan, J.
    Darocki, M.
    Klingfus, M.
    Derksen, B.
    Choi, M.
    Rudolf, F.
    Castillo, E.
    Chan, T.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 70 (04) : S161 - S161
  • [50] The emergency department utility of Simplify™ D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism in patients with pleuritic chest pain -: Reply
    Hogg, Kerstin
    Dawson, Deborah
    Mackway-Jones, Kevin
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 48 (01) : 107 - 107