Elevation of the d-dimer cut-off level might be applicable to rule out pulmonary embolism for active cancer patients in the emergency department

被引:0
|
作者
Hyojeong Kwon
Youn-Jung Kim
Eun-Ju Her
Bora Chae
Yoon-Seon Lee
机构
[1] Asan Medical Center,Department of Emergency Medicine
[2] University of Ulsan College of Medicine,undefined
来源
关键词
Pulmonary embolism; -dimer; Cancer; Diagnosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recent guidelines for diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism (PE) are based on clinical decision rules and d-dimer. d-dimer measurement is recommended only for patients who are ‘PE-unlikely’. We aimed to assess the current guidelines for cancer patients and to determine an optimal d-dimer cut-off level. This retrospective observational study was conducted in the emergency department of Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between 02/2017 and 09/2017 for the development cohort and between 06/2018 and 02/2019 for the validation cohort. Among adult active cancer patients with suspected PE, we included those who were ‘PE-unlikely’ according to Wells’ criteria and who underwent d-dimer testing and computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). A total of 498 patients (227 in the development cohort and 271 in the validation cohort) were included, and PE was diagnosed in 8.8% and 18.5% of patients, respectively. The optimal d-dimer cut-off level was 2.0 μg/mL. This elevated cut-off level showed a much higher specificity of 21.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.2–27.3%) and 21.7% (95% CI 16.8–7.6%) in the development and validation sets, respectively, compared with the specificity of 4.4% (95% CI 2.3–8.1%) and 4.1% (95% CI 2.2–7.6%) using the age-adjusted cut-off. The new d-dimer cut-off value identified unnecessary CTPA for 21.3% of patients (absolute difference, 16.9%, 35 of 207) in the development cohort and 21.7% (absolute difference, 17.6%, 39 of 221) of patients in the validation cohort compared to using the standard age-adjusted cut-off. The elevated d-dimer cut-off value combined with Wells’ criteria might reduce unnecessary CTPA in active cancer patients with a ‘PE-unlikely’ classification. Further clinical trials are warranted to improve the PE diagnostic strategy in cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 502
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] D-DIMER CUT-OFF ADJUSTED TO AGE PERFORMS BETTER FOR THE EXCLUSION OF PULMONARY EMBOLISM IN PATIENTS OVER 75 YEARS OLD
    Laruelle, Marie
    Lesage, Veronique
    Descamps, Olivier
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2011, 66 (06): : 465 - 465
  • [32] Diagnostic value of age-adjusted D-Dimer cut-off values in suspected acute pulmonary embolism
    Kozlowska, M.
    Zdonczyk, O.
    Wyzgal, A.
    Kostrubiec, M.
    Koc, M.
    Pacho, S.
    Paczynska, M.
    Ciurzynski, M.
    Wisniewska, M.
    Pruszczyk, P.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 953 - 953
  • [33] Comparison of 5 D-dimer reagents and application of an age adjusted cut-off for the diagnosis of VTE in emergency department
    Mullier, F.
    Vanpee, D.
    Jamart, J.
    Dubuc, E.
    Cornet, Y.
    Chatelain, C.
    Dogne, J-M
    Chatelain, B.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2011, 9 : 616 - 616
  • [34] Age Adjusted D-Dimer To Rule Out Pulmonary Embolism In Patients With Unlikely Clinical Probability
    Alamro, S.
    Avila, N. A.
    Rohatgi, P.
    Seam, N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 191
  • [35] Unnecessary D-Dimer Test Requests in the Emergency Department for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
    Kaballo, Mohammed A.
    Breslin, Brid
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 180 : S472 - S472
  • [36] Diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer assay in detection of Pulmonary Embolism in patients presenting in emergency department
    Asghar, Umair
    Khalil, Hamid
    Zafar, Kashif
    Mahmood-Ul-Hassan, Syed
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (12): : 3250 - 3252
  • [37] D-dimer and clinical probability to rule out pulmonary embolism in cancer patients: an explorative study to increase the clinical utility
    van Sluis, G. L.
    Douma, R. A.
    Sohne, M.
    Kamphuisen, P. W.
    Leebeek, F. W. G.
    Buller, H. R.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2009, 7 : 117 - 118
  • [38] Diagnostic utility of an age-specific cut-off for d-dimer for pulmonary embolism assessment when used with various pulmonary embolism risk scores
    Ackerly, Imogen
    Klim, Sharon
    McFarlane, James
    Kelly, Anne-Maree
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2018, 48 (04) : 465 - 468
  • [39] An optimized D-dimer cut-off value to predict pulmonary thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients
    Engels, Sophie Y. H.
    van Veen, Ilonka H. P. A. A.
    Oudkerk, Matthijs
    van der Palen, Job
    Heuvelmans, Marjolein A.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2023, 15 (11) : 6317 - 6322
  • [40] The emergency department utility of Simplify D-dimer™ to exclude pulmonary embolism in patients with pleuritic chest pain
    Hogg, K
    Dawson, D
    Mackway-Jones, K
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 46 (04) : 305 - 310