Elevation of the d-dimer cut-off level might be applicable to rule out pulmonary embolism for active cancer patients in the emergency department

被引:0
|
作者
Hyojeong Kwon
Youn-Jung Kim
Eun-Ju Her
Bora Chae
Yoon-Seon Lee
机构
[1] Asan Medical Center,Department of Emergency Medicine
[2] University of Ulsan College of Medicine,undefined
来源
关键词
Pulmonary embolism; -dimer; Cancer; Diagnosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recent guidelines for diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism (PE) are based on clinical decision rules and d-dimer. d-dimer measurement is recommended only for patients who are ‘PE-unlikely’. We aimed to assess the current guidelines for cancer patients and to determine an optimal d-dimer cut-off level. This retrospective observational study was conducted in the emergency department of Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between 02/2017 and 09/2017 for the development cohort and between 06/2018 and 02/2019 for the validation cohort. Among adult active cancer patients with suspected PE, we included those who were ‘PE-unlikely’ according to Wells’ criteria and who underwent d-dimer testing and computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). A total of 498 patients (227 in the development cohort and 271 in the validation cohort) were included, and PE was diagnosed in 8.8% and 18.5% of patients, respectively. The optimal d-dimer cut-off level was 2.0 μg/mL. This elevated cut-off level showed a much higher specificity of 21.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.2–27.3%) and 21.7% (95% CI 16.8–7.6%) in the development and validation sets, respectively, compared with the specificity of 4.4% (95% CI 2.3–8.1%) and 4.1% (95% CI 2.2–7.6%) using the age-adjusted cut-off. The new d-dimer cut-off value identified unnecessary CTPA for 21.3% of patients (absolute difference, 16.9%, 35 of 207) in the development cohort and 21.7% (absolute difference, 17.6%, 39 of 221) of patients in the validation cohort compared to using the standard age-adjusted cut-off. The elevated d-dimer cut-off value combined with Wells’ criteria might reduce unnecessary CTPA in active cancer patients with a ‘PE-unlikely’ classification. Further clinical trials are warranted to improve the PE diagnostic strategy in cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 502
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] D-dimer and D-dimer/fibrinogen ratio in predicting pulmonary embolism in patients evaluated in a hospital emergency department
    Kara, H.
    Bayir, A.
    Degirmenci, S.
    Kayis, S. A.
    Akinci, M.
    Ak, A.
    Celik, B.
    Dogru, A.
    Ozturk, B.
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2014, 69 (04) : 240 - 245
  • [22] The age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff level to rule out pulmonary embolism in patients with syncope
    Fuchs, Eyal
    Hardak, Emilia
    Keren-Politansky, Anat
    Hoffman, Ron
    Tzoran, Inna
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 97 : 125 - 127
  • [23] Should the cut-off value of D-dimer be elevated to exclude pulmonary embolism in acute exacerbation of COPD?
    Akpinar, Evrim Eylem
    Hosgun, Derya
    Doganay, Beyza
    Atac, Gokce Kaan
    Gulhan, Meral
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2013, 5 (04) : 430 - 434
  • [24] Elevated d-dimer cut-off values for computed tomography pulmonary angiography-d-dimer correlates with location of embolism
    Kubak, Mateuzs Piotr
    Lauritzen, Peter Maehre
    Borthne, Arne
    Ruud, Espen Asak
    Ashraf, Haseem
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (11)
  • [25] No added value of the age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off to the YEARS algorithm in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
    van der Pol, L. M.
    van der Hulle, T.
    Cheung, Y. W.
    Mairuhu, A. T. A.
    Schaar, C. G.
    Faber, L. M.
    ten Wolde, M.
    Hofstee, H. M. A.
    Hovens, M. M. C.
    Nijkeuter, M.
    van Klink, R. C. J.
    Kruip, M. J. H. A.
    Middeldorp, S.
    Huisman, M. V.
    Klok, F. A.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2017, 15 (12) : 2317 - 2324
  • [26] D-DIMER CUT-OFF ADJUSTED TO AGE PERFORMS BETTER FOR EXCLUSION OF PULMONARY EMBOLISM IN PATIENTS OVER 75 YEARS
    Laruelle, M.
    Descamps, O. S.
    Lesage, V
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2013, 68 (04) : 298 - 302
  • [27] An optimized D-dimer cut-off value to predict pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective study
    Engels, S.
    Van Veen, I
    Oudkerk, M.
    Van der Palen, J.
    Heuvelmans, M.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 60
  • [28] Normal D-dimer levels in emergency department patients suspected of acute pulmonary embolism
    Dunn, KL
    Wolf, JP
    Dorfman, DM
    Fitzpatrick, P
    Baker, JL
    Goldhaber, SZ
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (08) : 1475 - 1478
  • [29] Age-Dependent D-dimer Cut-off to Avoid Unnecessary CT-Exams for Ruling-out Pulmonary Embolism
    Altmann, M. M.
    Wrede, C. E.
    Peetz, D.
    Hoehne, M.
    Stroszczynski, C.
    Herold, T.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2015, 187 (09): : 795 - 800
  • [30] Age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off levels to rule out venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients
    Roncon, Loris
    Zuin, Marco
    Zonzin, Pietro
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2020, 190 : 102 - 102