Governance for sustainability: knowledge integration and multi-actor dimensions in risk management

被引:0
|
作者
Hideaki Shiroyama
Masaru Yarime
Makiko Matsuo
Heike Schroeder
Roland Scholz
Andrea E. Ulrich
机构
[1] The University of Tokyo,
[2] University of East Anglia,undefined
[3] ETH,undefined
来源
Sustainability Science | 2012年 / 7卷
关键词
Governance; Risk management; Knowledge integration; Multi-actor governance; REDD+; Phosphorus;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sustainability has many dimensions, including various aspects of environmental, social and economic sustainability. This paper proposes an analytical framework of risk-related governance for sustainability, based on literature review, focusing on two dimensions—knowledge integration and multi-actor governance. Knowledge integration necessitates wider coverage of predicted and anticipated risks and information on those risks. Multi-actor governance necessitates mechanisms that enable cooperation among actors. The relevance of this analytical framework is then checked using concrete cases of governance for reducing emission from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+), and the possible case of governance for sustainable phosphorus management.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 55
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of knowledge risk management on sustainability
    Zieba, Malgorzata
    Durst, Susanne
    Hinteregger, Christoph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 26 (11) : 234 - 258
  • [42] 'Sharing the space' in the agricultural knowledge and innovation system: multi-actor innovation partnerships with farmers and foresters in Europe
    Fieldsend, Andrew F.
    Cronin, Evelien
    Varga, Eszter
    Biro, Szabolcs
    Rogge, Elke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & EXTENSION, 2021, 27 (04): : 423 - 442
  • [43] Results of multi-actor collaboration in risk analysis: a simplified risk assessment toolkit for rapid detection of emerging risks
    Meerpoel, Celine
    Ciasca, Biancamaria
    Cito, Nunzia
    Moretti, Antonio
    De Saeger, Sarah
    Lattanzio, Veronica M. T.
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2023, 21
  • [44] Dimensions of knowledge governance in a multi-PMO project context
    Martinez Sanz, Maria Mercedes
    Ortiz-Marcos, Isabel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2020, 13 (07) : 1423 - 1441
  • [45] Effective change management through integration and knowledge governance
    Madia, F.
    Dettori, M. G.
    Galasso, A.
    Iacono, G.
    [J]. 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, 2006, : 385 - +
  • [46] Knowledge Management as Risk Management: A Need for Open Governance?
    Clive Smallman
    [J]. Risk Management, 1999, 1 (4) : 7 - 20
  • [47] Work-based higher education programmes in Germany and the US: Comparing multi-actor corporatist governance in higher education
    Graf, Lukas
    [J]. POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2017, 36 (01) : 89 - 108
  • [48] Innovative Multi-Actor Collaborations as Collective Actors and Institutionalized Spaces. The Case of Food Governance Transformation in Leuven (Belgium)
    Medina-Garcia, Clara
    Nagarajan, Sharmada
    Castillo-Vysokolan, Lariza
    Beatse, Erik
    Van den Broeck, Pieter
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2022, 5
  • [49] Sustainability, risk management and governance: towards an integrative approach
    Lenssen, Joris-Johann
    Dentchev, Nikolay A.
    Roger, Ludwig
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2014, 14 (05): : 670 - +
  • [50] Sustainability and Environmental Policy Integration: Local Level Sustainability through Knowledge Involvement and New Governance Arrangements
    Terizakis, Georgios
    [J]. GOVERNANCE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INTEGRATION, 2010, : 87 - 101