Governance for sustainability: knowledge integration and multi-actor dimensions in risk management

被引:0
|
作者
Hideaki Shiroyama
Masaru Yarime
Makiko Matsuo
Heike Schroeder
Roland Scholz
Andrea E. Ulrich
机构
[1] The University of Tokyo,
[2] University of East Anglia,undefined
[3] ETH,undefined
来源
Sustainability Science | 2012年 / 7卷
关键词
Governance; Risk management; Knowledge integration; Multi-actor governance; REDD+; Phosphorus;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sustainability has many dimensions, including various aspects of environmental, social and economic sustainability. This paper proposes an analytical framework of risk-related governance for sustainability, based on literature review, focusing on two dimensions—knowledge integration and multi-actor governance. Knowledge integration necessitates wider coverage of predicted and anticipated risks and information on those risks. Multi-actor governance necessitates mechanisms that enable cooperation among actors. The relevance of this analytical framework is then checked using concrete cases of governance for reducing emission from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+), and the possible case of governance for sustainable phosphorus management.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 55
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MULTI-ACTOR ENGAGEMENT: AN OPEN INNOVATION PROCESS OF KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE AND CO-CREATION
    Franco, L.
    Justo, A.
    Cotelo, C.
    Arias, I
    Garrido, L.
    Lloret, L.
    Rodriguez-Aubo, N.
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI 2019), 2019, : 3808 - 3813
  • [32] Coordination Strategies for Distribution Grid Congestion Management in a Multi-Actor, Multi-Objective Setting
    Andersen, Peter Bach
    Hu, Junjie
    Heussen, Kai
    [J]. 2012 3RD IEEE PES INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES EUROPE (ISGT EUROPE), 2012,
  • [33] Assessing the Impact of Nonprofit Organizations on Multi-Actor Global Governance Initiatives: The Case of the UN Global Compact
    Hengevoss, Alice
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (13)
  • [34] Cooperation of return-to-work professionals: the challenges of multi-actor work disability management
    Liukko, Jyri
    Kuuva, Niina
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 39 (15) : 1466 - 1473
  • [35] Multi-actor approaches and engagement strategies to promote the adoption of best groundwater management practices
    Calliera, Maura
    Capri, Ettore
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & HEALTH, 2022, 27
  • [36] Editorial: The governance of adaptation to climate change as a multi-level, multi-sector and multi-actor challenge: a European comparative perspective
    Dewulf, Art
    Meijerink, Sander
    Runhaar, Hens
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2015, 6 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [37] Actor model and knowledge management systems: Social interaction as a framework for knowledge integration
    Becerra-Fernandez, I
    Wang, TW
    Agha, G
    Sin, T
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2005, 3782 : 19 - 31
  • [38] A multi-actor ICT platform for increasing sustainability and resilience of small-scale farmers after pandemic crisis
    Cimino, Antonio
    Longo, Francesco
    Solina, Vittorio
    Verteramo, Saverino
    [J]. BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2024, 126 (05): : 1870 - 1886
  • [39] Triggering multi-actor change cascades: Non-representational theory and deep disaster risk management co-production
    Hope, Max
    McCloskey, John
    Nicbhloscaidh, Mairead
    Crowley, Dominic
    Hunt, Dom
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING E-NATURE AND SPACE, 2020, 3 (04) : 1158 - 1179
  • [40] Fuzzy Multi-actor Multi-criteria Decision Making for sustainability assessment of biomass-based technologies for hydrogen production
    Ren, Jingzheng
    Fedele, Andrea
    Mason, Marco
    Manzardo, Alessandro
    Scipioni, Antonio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (22) : 9111 - 9120