Short dynamic FDG-PET imaging protocol for patients with lung cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Tatsuo Torizuka
Shuji Nobezawa
Shigeru Momiki
Norio Kasamatsu
Toshihiko Kanno
Etsuji Yoshikawa
Masami Futatsubashi
Hiroyuki Okada
Yasuomi Ouchi
机构
[1] Positron Medical Center,
[2] Hamamatsu Medical Center,undefined
[3] Hamakita,undefined
[4] Department of Thoracic Surgery,undefined
[5] Hamamatsu Medical Center,undefined
[6] Hamamatsu,undefined
[7] Department of Respiratory Disease,undefined
[8] Hamamatsu Medical Center,undefined
[9] Hamamatsu,undefined
[10] Central Research Laboratory,undefined
[11] Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.,undefined
[12] Hamakita,undefined
[13] Correspondence to: Positron Medical Center,undefined
[14] Hamamatsu Medical Center,undefined
[15] 5000,undefined
[16] Hirakuchi,undefined
[17] Hamakita,undefined
[18] Shizuoka,undefined
[19] 434-0041,undefined
来源
关键词
Primary lung cancer FDG-PET Kinetic modelling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This positron emission tomography (PET) study was designed to compare 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) kinetic parameters of tumours derived from imaging frames of 0–60 min post FDG injection with those derived from shorter imaging frames of 0–30 min. Dynamic FDG-PET scans were performed on 20 patients with primary lung cancers for 1 h after intravenous injection of FDG. Images were reconstructed with attenuation correction using transmission images obtained with a germanium-68 ring source immediately before FDG injection. A region of interest (ROI) was placed on the plane of the maximal tumour FDG uptake. Arterial input function was estimated from an ROI defined in the left atrium. Based on the standard three-compartment metabolic model, we calculated the rate constants (K1–k3) and influx constant Ki = K1k3/(k2+k3) using the imaging frames for 60 min and 30 min post FDG injection. The standardized uptake value (SUV) of tumour was measured using the imaging frame of 50–60 min post injection. High correlations were observed between kinetic parameters (K1, k2, k3 and Ki) derived from imaging frames of 0–60 min and 0–30 min [0.231±0.114 vs 0.260±0.174 (r=0.958), 1.149±1.038 vs 1.565±2.027 (r=0.968), 0.259±0.154 vs 0.311±0.194 (r=0.886) and 0.044±0.022 vs 0.048±0.023 (r=0.961), respectively, P<0.001]. Ki showed an excellent agreement between the two methods (y=–0.0041+0.9831x). Mean SUV of the lung cancers was 6.58±2.85. It is concluded that the briefer 30-min acquisition may yield essentially the same results as the standard 60-min imaging protocol, thus offering a time saving in dynamic PET studies in which the model parameters are desired.
引用
收藏
页码:1538 / 1542
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prognostic value of tumor heterogeneity evaluated by FDG-PET/CT imaging in lung cancer patients.
    Hughes, Nicola Marie
    Mou, Tian
    O'Regan, Kevin N.
    Murphy, Peter
    O'Sullivan, Janet N.
    Wolsztynski, Eric
    Huang, Jian
    Kennedy, Marcus
    Eary, Janet F.
    O'Sullivan, Finbarr
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)
  • [32] Implications of a FDG-PET EARL Protocol for Ga-68 PET Imaging
    Koopman, D.
    Noortman, W. A.
    Jager, P. L.
    Slump, C. H.
    van Dalen, J. A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2017, 44 : S225 - S226
  • [33] Clinical feasibility study of early 30-minute dynamic FDG-PET scanning protocol for patients with lung lesions
    Fen Du
    Xieraili Wumener
    Yarong Zhang
    Maoqun Zhang
    Jiuhui Zhao
    Jinpeng Zhou
    Yiluo Li
    Bin Huang
    Rongliang Wu
    Zeheng Xia
    Zhiheng Yao
    Tao Sun
    Ying Liang
    [J]. EJNMMI Physics, 11
  • [34] Validation of FDG-PET/MR imaging in gynecological cancer compared to standard clinical FDG-PET/CT
    Lofgren, J.
    Loft, A.
    Berthelsen, A. K.
    Hansen, A. E.
    Keller, S. H.
    Holm, S.
    Hojgaard, L.
    Beyer, T.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2012, 39 : S370 - S371
  • [35] Clinical feasibility study of early 30-minute dynamic FDG-PET scanning protocol for patients with lung lesions
    Du, Fen
    Wumener, Xieraili
    Zhang, Yarong
    Zhang, Maoqun
    Zhao, Jiuhui
    Zhou, Jinpeng
    Li, Yiluo
    Huang, Bin
    Wu, Rongliang
    Xia, Zeheng
    Yao, Zhiheng
    Sun, Tao
    Liang, Ying
    [J]. EJNMMI PHYSICS, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [36] Impact of FDG-PET on lung cancer delineation for radiotherapy
    Morarji, Kavita
    Fowler, Allan
    Vinod, Shalini K.
    Shon, Ivan Ho
    Laurence, Jerome M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2012, 56 (02) : 195 - 203
  • [37] Value of FDG-PET scanning in management of lung cancer
    Coleman, RE
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 359 (9315): : 1361 - 1362
  • [38] FDG-PET: An important tool in the diagnosis of lung cancer
    Abenhardt, Wolfgang
    [J]. ONKOLOGIE, 2007, 30 (07): : 352 - 352
  • [39] Evaluation of malignancy for esophageal cancer by dynamic FDG-PET
    Tochigi, T.
    Shuto, K.
    Kono, T.
    Okazumi, S.
    Matsubara, H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S248 - S249
  • [40] A case of pancreatic cancer unrecognized on FDG-PET imaging
    Tasaki, Kentaro
    Ooshima, Ikuya
    Ariga, Takamitsu
    Yoshimura, Seiji
    Shinoto, Koichi
    Okazaki, Yasushi
    Ozaki, Masahiko
    Nagase, Hajime
    Fujiwara, Kenji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 22 : A249 - A249