Short dynamic FDG-PET imaging protocol for patients with lung cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Tatsuo Torizuka
Shuji Nobezawa
Shigeru Momiki
Norio Kasamatsu
Toshihiko Kanno
Etsuji Yoshikawa
Masami Futatsubashi
Hiroyuki Okada
Yasuomi Ouchi
机构
[1] Positron Medical Center,
[2] Hamamatsu Medical Center,undefined
[3] Hamakita,undefined
[4] Department of Thoracic Surgery,undefined
[5] Hamamatsu Medical Center,undefined
[6] Hamamatsu,undefined
[7] Department of Respiratory Disease,undefined
[8] Hamamatsu Medical Center,undefined
[9] Hamamatsu,undefined
[10] Central Research Laboratory,undefined
[11] Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.,undefined
[12] Hamakita,undefined
[13] Correspondence to: Positron Medical Center,undefined
[14] Hamamatsu Medical Center,undefined
[15] 5000,undefined
[16] Hirakuchi,undefined
[17] Hamakita,undefined
[18] Shizuoka,undefined
[19] 434-0041,undefined
来源
关键词
Primary lung cancer FDG-PET Kinetic modelling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This positron emission tomography (PET) study was designed to compare 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) kinetic parameters of tumours derived from imaging frames of 0–60 min post FDG injection with those derived from shorter imaging frames of 0–30 min. Dynamic FDG-PET scans were performed on 20 patients with primary lung cancers for 1 h after intravenous injection of FDG. Images were reconstructed with attenuation correction using transmission images obtained with a germanium-68 ring source immediately before FDG injection. A region of interest (ROI) was placed on the plane of the maximal tumour FDG uptake. Arterial input function was estimated from an ROI defined in the left atrium. Based on the standard three-compartment metabolic model, we calculated the rate constants (K1–k3) and influx constant Ki = K1k3/(k2+k3) using the imaging frames for 60 min and 30 min post FDG injection. The standardized uptake value (SUV) of tumour was measured using the imaging frame of 50–60 min post injection. High correlations were observed between kinetic parameters (K1, k2, k3 and Ki) derived from imaging frames of 0–60 min and 0–30 min [0.231±0.114 vs 0.260±0.174 (r=0.958), 1.149±1.038 vs 1.565±2.027 (r=0.968), 0.259±0.154 vs 0.311±0.194 (r=0.886) and 0.044±0.022 vs 0.048±0.023 (r=0.961), respectively, P<0.001]. Ki showed an excellent agreement between the two methods (y=–0.0041+0.9831x). Mean SUV of the lung cancers was 6.58±2.85. It is concluded that the briefer 30-min acquisition may yield essentially the same results as the standard 60-min imaging protocol, thus offering a time saving in dynamic PET studies in which the model parameters are desired.
引用
收藏
页码:1538 / 1542
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FDG-PET imaging in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer
    Salminen, E
    Mac Manus, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (03) : 357 - 360
  • [22] Commentary - FDG-PET imaging in small cell lung cancer: any value?
    Lassen, U
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 2002, 37 (01) : 7 - 7
  • [23] Present and future roles of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of lung cancer
    Kazuhiro Kitajima
    Hiroshi Doi
    Tomonori Kanda
    Tomohiko Yamane
    Tetsuya Tsujikawa
    Hayato Kaida
    Yukihisa Tamaki
    Kozo Kuribayashi
    [J]. Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2016, 34 : 387 - 399
  • [24] Present and future roles of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of lung cancer
    Kitajima, Kazuhiro
    Doi, Hiroshi
    Kanda, Tomonori
    Yamane, Tomohiko
    Tsujikawa, Tetsuya
    Kaida, Hayato
    Tamaki, Yukihisa
    Kuribayashi, Kozo
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 34 (06) : 387 - 399
  • [25] Initial experience with FDG-PET scans in the evaluation of patients with lung cancer
    Mohan, K
    Mciver, A
    Fewins, H
    Ledson, MJ
    Walshaw, MJ
    [J]. THORAX, 2005, 60 : II12 - II12
  • [26] Whole-body FDG-PET imaging in the management of patients with cancer
    Hustinx, R
    Bénard, F
    Alavi, A
    [J]. SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2002, 32 (01) : 35 - 46
  • [27] FDG-PET imaging of lymphomas in pediatric patients
    Bui, C
    Shulkin, BL
    Mody, R
    Shreve, PD
    Strouse, PJ
    Lahti, LD
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 285 - 286
  • [28] Nuclear Medicine Imaging of Infection in Cancer Patients (With Emphasis on FDG-PET)
    Bleeker-Rovers, Chantal P.
    Vos, Fidel J.
    van der Graaf, Winette T. A.
    Oyen, Wim J. G.
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2011, 16 (07): : 980 - 991
  • [29] Dynamic FDG-PET imaging for differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes of lung cancer
    Wumener, Xieraili
    Zhang, Yarong
    Wang, Zhenguo
    Zhang, Maoqun
    Zang, Zihan
    Huang, Bin
    Liu, Ming
    Huang, Shengyun
    Huang, Yong
    Wang, Peng
    Liang, Ying
    Sun, Tao
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [30] The efficacy of FDG-PET imaging in evaluating adrenal glands involvement in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer
    Selcuk, NA
    Akman, H
    Halaç, M
    Okay, S
    Bozluolcay, S
    Sönmezoglu, K
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2004, 31 : S350 - S350