Innovating public engagement and patient involvement through strategic collaboration and practice

被引:43
|
作者
Holmes L. [1 ]
Cresswell K. [1 ]
Williams S. [1 ]
Parsons S. [1 ]
Keane A. [1 ]
Wilson C. [1 ]
Islam S. [1 ]
Joseph O. [1 ]
Miah J. [1 ]
Robinson E. [1 ]
Starling B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Public Programmes Team, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Nowgen Centre, 29 Grafton Street, Manchester
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Diversity; Health research; Inclusion; Patient and public involvement; Public engagement;
D O I
10.1186/s40900-019-0160-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patient and public involvement and engagement is an important and expected component of health-related research activity in the UK. Specifically within the health research sphere, public engagement (usually defined as raising awareness of research) and patient involvement (usually defined as actively involving people in research) have traditionally been seen as separate but have much to gain from working together towards a common goal of better health outcomes for all. Methods: This paper describes a unique approach taken by the Public Programmes Team: a small interdisciplinary team of public engagement specialists, with backgrounds in science, community development, public engagement and involvement, policy, ethics, communications, industry, museums and creative practice, embedded within translational research infrastructure and delivery in Manchester in the North West of England. We propose a new model of professional practice - a 'cycle' of engagement and involvement - innovating across the complementary fields of public engagement and patient involvement, and working inclusively and in partnership with people in health research. Further, our approach capitalises on strategic collaboration offering economies of scale and a joined up way of working. Our ambition is to boldly experiment, learn and reflect, responsibly and based on evidence and partnerships, using methods of engagement that address issues of social justice. Results: Here, we report on preliminary case studies exemplifying the impact of our approach, and data relating to achievements and learning between April 2017 and March 2018. Informed by our findings, we propose that our approach has the potential to be replicated elsewhere. Conclusions: Our practice and the beginning of its evaluation lead us to believe that our way of working and model of professional practice - the 'cycle' of engagement and involvement - is effective in: addressing our vision of making health research relevant and inclusive for everyone; and embedding and joining up public involvement in a busy and fertile translational health research ecosystem. © 2019 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The opportunity for greater patient and public involvement and engagement in drug development and regulation
    Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
    Samantha Cruz Rivera
    Kathy Oliver
    Elaine Manna
    Phil Collis
    Bellinda L. King-Kallimanis
    Vishal Bhatnagar
    Ralf Herold
    Jon Hopkins
    Lisa Campbell
    Alysha Croker
    Myles Leach
    Melanie J. Calvert
    Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2023, 22 : 337 - 338
  • [32] A study of the reporting of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in orthodontic research
    Patel, Veena A.
    Shelswell, Jonathan
    Hillyard, Neil
    Pavitt, Sue
    Barber, Sophy K.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2021, 48 (01) : 42 - 51
  • [33] Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE): first steps in the process of the engagement in research projects in Brazil
    Bensenor, I. M.
    Goulart, A. C.
    Thomas, G. N.
    Lip, G. Y. H.
    Arasalingam, Ajini
    Beane, Abi
    Bensenor, Isabela M.
    Brocklehurst, Peter
    Cheng, Kar Keung
    El-Bouri, Wahbi
    Feng, Mei
    Goulart, Alessandra C.
    Greenfield, Sheila
    Guo, Yutao
    Guruparan, Mahesan
    Gusso, Gustavo
    Gooden, Tiffany E.
    Haniffa, Rashan
    Humphreys, Lindsey
    Jolly, Kate
    Jowett, Sue
    Kodippily, Chamira
    Kumarendran, Balachandran
    Lancashire, Emma
    Lane, Deirdre A.
    Li, Xuewen
    Lip, Gregory Y. H.
    Li, Yan-guang
    Lobban, Trudie
    Lotufo, Paulo A.
    Manaseki-Holland, Semira
    Moore, David
    Nirantharakumar, Krishnarajah
    Olmos, Rodrigo D.
    Paschoal, Elisabete
    Pirasanth, Paskaran
    Powsiga, Uruthirakumar
    Romagnolli, Carla
    Santos, Itamar S.
    Shantsila, Alena
    Sheron, Vethanayagan Antony
    Shribavan, Kanesamoorthy
    Szmigin, Isabelle
    Subaschandren, Kumaran
    Surenthirakumaran, Rajendra
    Tai, Meihui
    Thavarajah, Bamini
    Thomas, G. Neil
    Toippa, Timo
    Varella, Ana C.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 55 (01)
  • [34] Importance of public engagement found through involvement in Horse Slaughter Bill
    Rossi, J
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 226 (03): : 346 - 346
  • [35] Preservation and Redevelopment of Cultural Heritage Through Public Engagement and University Involvement
    Frullo, Nadia
    Mattone, Manuela
    HERITAGE, 2024, 7 (10): : 5723 - 5747
  • [36] PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT IN JAPANESE CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE DEVELOPMENT
    Okumura, A.
    Nakayama, T.
    Sugawara, H.
    Yamaguchi, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2017, 29 : 5 - 5
  • [37] Enhancing pharmacy practice doctoral research with patient and public involvement
    Youssef, Essra
    Mellor, Doug
    Walkerly, Sujata
    Wright, David J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2022, 30 (03) : 288 - 291
  • [38] Patient and public engagement
    Lemire, Francine
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2015, 61 (04) : 384 - 384
  • [39] Public patient involvement and engagement via 'think-in' for digital cancer surgery
    Nally, Deirdre M.
    Kearns, Emma C.
    Cahill, Ronan A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109 (01) : E1 - E2
  • [40] Co-creating a patient and public involvement and engagement 'how to' guide for researchers
    Kaisler R.E.
    Missbach B.
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 6 (1)