Innovating public engagement and patient involvement through strategic collaboration and practice

被引:43
|
作者
Holmes L. [1 ]
Cresswell K. [1 ]
Williams S. [1 ]
Parsons S. [1 ]
Keane A. [1 ]
Wilson C. [1 ]
Islam S. [1 ]
Joseph O. [1 ]
Miah J. [1 ]
Robinson E. [1 ]
Starling B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Public Programmes Team, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Nowgen Centre, 29 Grafton Street, Manchester
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Diversity; Health research; Inclusion; Patient and public involvement; Public engagement;
D O I
10.1186/s40900-019-0160-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patient and public involvement and engagement is an important and expected component of health-related research activity in the UK. Specifically within the health research sphere, public engagement (usually defined as raising awareness of research) and patient involvement (usually defined as actively involving people in research) have traditionally been seen as separate but have much to gain from working together towards a common goal of better health outcomes for all. Methods: This paper describes a unique approach taken by the Public Programmes Team: a small interdisciplinary team of public engagement specialists, with backgrounds in science, community development, public engagement and involvement, policy, ethics, communications, industry, museums and creative practice, embedded within translational research infrastructure and delivery in Manchester in the North West of England. We propose a new model of professional practice - a 'cycle' of engagement and involvement - innovating across the complementary fields of public engagement and patient involvement, and working inclusively and in partnership with people in health research. Further, our approach capitalises on strategic collaboration offering economies of scale and a joined up way of working. Our ambition is to boldly experiment, learn and reflect, responsibly and based on evidence and partnerships, using methods of engagement that address issues of social justice. Results: Here, we report on preliminary case studies exemplifying the impact of our approach, and data relating to achievements and learning between April 2017 and March 2018. Informed by our findings, we propose that our approach has the potential to be replicated elsewhere. Conclusions: Our practice and the beginning of its evaluation lead us to believe that our way of working and model of professional practice - the 'cycle' of engagement and involvement - is effective in: addressing our vision of making health research relevant and inclusive for everyone; and embedding and joining up public involvement in a busy and fertile translational health research ecosystem. © 2019 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Innovating public participation methods: Technoscientization and reflexive engagement
    Voss, Jan-Peter
    Amelung, Nina
    SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2016, 46 (05) : 749 - 772
  • [23] ReIMAGINE: a prostate cancer research consortium with added value through its patient and public involvement and engagement
    S. Green
    S. Tuck
    J. Long
    T. Green
    A. Green
    P. Ellis
    A. Haire
    C. Moss
    F. Cahill
    N. McCartan
    L. Brown
    A. Santaolalla
    T. Marsden
    M. Rodriquez Justo
    J. Hadley
    S. Punwani
    G. Attard
    H. Ahmed
    C. M. Moore
    M. Emberton
    M. Van Hemelrijck
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 7 (1)
  • [24] Patient and public involvement and engagement: Do we need an ‘ethical anchor’?
    Sophie Suri
    Samantha L. Harrison
    Alex Bevin-Nicholls
    Felicity Shenton
    Sandra Atkinson
    Jenny Earle
    Gaynor Williams
    Joanne Lally
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 10 (1)
  • [25] Opportunities and Challenges in Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement in Palliative Care Research
    Payne, Sheila Alison
    Sumerfield, Marion
    Hughes, Sean
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 27 (10) : 1288 - 1290
  • [26] The opportunity for greater patient and public involvement and engagement in drug development and regulation
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Cruz Rivera, Samantha
    Oliver, Kathy
    Manna, Elaine
    Collis, Phil
    King-Kallimanis, Bellinda L.
    Bhatnagar, Vishal
    Herold, Ralf
    Hopkins, Jon
    Campbell, Lisa
    Croker, Alysha
    Leach, Myles
    Calvert, Melanie J.
    NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2023, 22 (05) : 337 - 338
  • [27] PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT IN PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY - THAT'S IS HOW IT WORKS!
    Weiler-Wichtl, Liesa J.
    Kienesberger, Anita
    Gojo, Johannes
    Hansl, Rita
    Hopfgartner, Maximilian
    Leiss, Ulrike
    Schneider, Carina
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2022, 69
  • [28] Innovating Family Medicine Residency Education Through Collaboration
    Miser, William F.
    Mitchell, Karen B.
    FAMILY MEDICINE, 2018, 50 (07) : 501 - 502
  • [29] In the works: Patient and public involvement and engagement in healthcare decision-making
    de Graaff, Bert
    Kleinhout-Vliek, Tineke
    Van de Bovenkamp, Hester
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2021, 24 (06) : 1903 - 1904
  • [30] Commentary: Advocating for patient and public involvement and engagement in health economic evaluation
    Sophie Staniszewska
    Ivett Jakab
    Eric Low
    Jean Mossman
    Phil Posner
    Don Husereau
    Richard Stephens
    Michael Drummond
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 9 (1)