Susceptibility artifacts induced by crowns of different materials with prepared teeth and titanium implants in magnetic resonance imaging

被引:0
|
作者
Xiaomeng Gao
Qianbing Wan
Qingping Gao
机构
[1] Central South University,Department of Stomatology, Xiangya Hospital
[2] Sichuan University,State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Prosthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to investigate the artifacts induced by crowns composed of different materials with prepared teeth and titanium implants. Resin, metal-ceramic, ceramic and zirconia crowns were fabricated and placed onto the prepared teeth on a human cadaver head or titanium implants with prosthesis abutments on a dry human mandible. The samples were scanned on a 1.5 T MRI apparatus, and artifact areas were defined as the signal intensity and signal loss adjacent to the prosthesis and measured by a threshold tool with ImageJ2x. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0. Resin, ceramic, zirconia, and precious metal-ceramic crowns barely produced artifacts on the cadaver skull (p > 0.999). By contrast, pure Ti and nonprecious metal-ceramic crowns created significant artifacts (p < 0.001). The average artifacts reduction of double Au-Pt and Ag-Pd metal-ceramic crowns combined with titanium implants and abutments was 79.49 mm2 (p < 0.001) and 74.17 mm2 (p < 0.001) respectively, while artifact areas were increased in double Co-Cr and Ni–Cr metal-ceramic crowns by 150.10 mm2 (p < 0.001) and 175.50 mm2 (p < 0.001) respectively. Zirconia, ceramic and precious metal-ceramic crowns induce less MRI artifacts after tooth preparation while precious metal-ceramic crowns alleviate artifacts in combination with titanium implants.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Development of titanium needle probes for neural recording and evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts
    Yoon H.
    Deshpande D.C.
    Kim T.H.
    Jeong E.-K.
    Harbaugh R.E.
    Varadan V.K.
    Journal of Nanotechnology in Engineering and Medicine, 2010, 1 (01)
  • [23] REDUCTION OF ARTIFACTS IN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGES BY USING OPTIMIZED MATERIALS FOR DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES AND IMPLANTS
    FRITZSCHE, S
    THULL, R
    HAASE, A
    BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 1994, 39 (03): : 42 - 46
  • [24] REDUCTION OF ARTIFACTS IN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGES BY USING OPTIMIZED MATERIALS FOR DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES AND IMPLANTS
    FRITZSCHE, S
    THULL, R
    HAASE, A
    BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 1995, 40 (1-2): : 29 - 33
  • [25] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Venous Stents at 1.5 T Susceptibility Artifacts and Radiofrequency Shielding
    Reiss, Simon
    Oezen, Ali Caglar
    Lottner, Thomas
    Reichert, Andreas
    Massmann, Alexander
    Bock, Michael
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2020, 55 (11) : 741 - 746
  • [26] Dedicated Phantom to Study Susceptibility Artifacts Caused by Depth Electrode in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Garcia, J.
    Hidalgo, S. S.
    Solis, S. E.
    Vazquez, D.
    Nunez, J.
    Rodriguez, A. O.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 1494 : 97 - 99
  • [27] A Method for Whole Brain Ex Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Minimal Susceptibility Artifacts
    Shatil, Anwar S.
    Matsuda, Kant M.
    Figley, Chase R.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [28] Carbon fiber–reinforced PEEK versus titanium implants: an in vitro comparison of susceptibility artifacts in CT and MR imaging
    Theresa Krätzig
    Klaus C. Mende
    Malte Mohme
    Helge Kniep
    Marc Dreimann
    Martin Stangenberg
    Manfred Westphal
    Tobias Gauer
    Sven O. Eicker
    Neurosurgical Review, 2021, 44 : 2163 - 2170
  • [29] Artifacts on Magnetic Resonance Imaging from Electronic Identification Enablement in Silicone Gel Implants Are Not Negligible
    Kurz, Kathinka D.
    Kallevag, Oystein
    Austratt, Kenneth
    Styr, Bodil
    Leiknes, Jon Bjarne
    Kroger, Pal
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2021, 9 (11) : E3941
  • [30] Options for the reduction of magnetic susceptibility artifacts caused by implanted microchips in 0.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
    Piesnack, S.
    Oechtering, G.
    Ludewig, E.
    TIERAERZTLICHE PRAXIS AUSGABE KLEINTIERE HEIMTIERE, 2015, 43 (02): : 83 - 92