Options for the reduction of magnetic susceptibility artifacts caused by implanted microchips in 0.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging

被引:2
|
作者
Piesnack, S. [1 ]
Oechtering, G. [1 ]
Ludewig, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Klin Kleintiere, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
来源
关键词
Low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); susceptibility; dog; cat; radiofrequency identification device; imaging techniques; SOFT-TISSUES ADJACENT; FIELD INHOMOGENEITIES; ORTHOPEDIC HARDWARE; METALLIC IMPLANTS; SURGICAL IMPLANTS; STRENGTH; IMAGES; DOGS;
D O I
10.15654/TPK-140663
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objective: Microchips contain ferromagnetic materials, which lead to severe focal image interferences when performing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Very small animals are particularly prone to these susceptibility artifacts, which may hinder analysis of the neck-region MRI image. We investigated the impact of sequence type on the artifact's size and determined the optimal imaging parameters to minimize these artifacts. Furthermore, the minimum distance between the microchip and the spinal canal required to assess the spinal structures should be determined. Material and methods: Investigations were performed on the cadavers of 26 cats and two dogs using a low-field MRI System (field strength 0.5 Tesla). To quantify susceptibility artifacts, several sequence types (spin echo, turbo-spin echo (TSE), gradient echo) and imaging parameters (echo time (TE), voxel volume, frequency direction) were systematically varied. Additionally, computed tomography imaging was performed to determine the distance between the microchip and the spinal canal. Results: The size of the artifact was smallest with T1-weighted TSE sequences. A short TE (10 ms) and a small voxel size (acquisition matrix 256 x 256 pixels, field of view 160 mm, slice thickness 2 mm) significantly reduced artifact size. Furthermore, it could be shown that by changing the frequency- and phase-encoding direction, the shape and orientation of the maximum dimension of the artifact could be influenced. Even when using an optimized T1-weighted TSE sequence, it was impossible to evaluate the spinal cord when the distance between the microchip and the center of the spinal canal was <19 mm. Conclusion and clinical relevance: In MR studies of the cervical spine of small dogs and cats, microchips can cause severe susceptibility artifacts. Because of the small distance between the microchip and the spinal structures, spinal evaluation may be limited or impossible. The investigations demonstrated that the adjustment of sequence parameters helps to significantly minimize artifact size and shape. The greatest reduction in artifact size was achieved by using a T1-weighted TSE sequence.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 92
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the Susceptibility Artifacts and Tissue Injury Caused by Implanted Microchips in Dogs on 1.5 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Saito, Miyoko
    Ono, Shin
    Kayanuma, Hideki
    Honnami, Muneki
    Muto, Makoto
    Une, Yumi
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 72 (05): : 575 - 581
  • [2] Quantitative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility artifacts caused by neurosurgical biomaterials: Comparison of 0.5, 1.5. and 3.0 Tesla magnetic fields
    Matsuura, H
    Inoue, T
    Ogasawara, K
    Sasaki, M
    Konno, H
    Kuzu, Y
    Nishimoto, H
    Ogawa, A
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2005, 45 (08) : 395 - 398
  • [3] Quantitative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility artifacts caused by neurosurgical biomaterials: Comparison of 0.5, 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla magnetic fields - Commentary
    Uno, M
    Nagahiro, S
    Watanabe, E
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2005, 45 (08) : 398 - 399
  • [4] Functionality of implanted microchips following magnetic resonance imaging
    Haifley, Katherine A.
    Hecht, Silke
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 240 (05): : 577 - 579
  • [5] Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Calculation of the magnetic field disturbances
    Balac, S
    Caloz, G
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1996, 32 (03) : 1645 - 1648
  • [6] Dedicated Phantom to Study Susceptibility Artifacts Caused by Depth Electrode in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Garcia, J.
    Hidalgo, S. S.
    Solis, S. E.
    Vazquez, D.
    Nunez, J.
    Rodriguez, A. O.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 1494 : 97 - 99
  • [7] RESPIRATORY GATING IN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING AT 0.5 TESLA
    RUNGE, VM
    CLANTON, JA
    PARTAIN, CL
    JAMES, AE
    RADIOLOGY, 1984, 151 (02) : 521 - 523
  • [9] Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Krupa, Katarzyna
    Bekiesinska-Figatowska, Monika
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 80 : 93 - 106
  • [10] Predictability of magnetic susceptibility artifacts from metallic orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance imaging
    Blankenstein, Felix
    Buu Tai Truong
    Thomas, Andreas
    Thieme, Nadine
    Zachriat, Christine
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2015, 76 (01): : 14 - 29