Improving the performance of artificial intelligence models using the rotation forest technique for landslide susceptibility mapping

被引:0
|
作者
H. Shen
F. Huang
X. Fan
H. Shahabi
A. Shirzadi
D. Wang
C. Peng
X. Zhao
W. Chen
机构
[1] Shaanxi Nuclear Industry Engineering Survey Institute Co.,School of Civil Engineering and Architecture
[2] Ltd.,State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection
[3] Nanchang University,Department of Geomorphology, Faculty of Natural Resources
[4] Chengdu University of Technology,Department of Zrebar Lake Environmental Research, Kurdistan Studies Institute
[5] University of Kurdistan,Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources
[6] University of Kurdistan,College of Geology and Environment
[7] University of Kurdistan,undefined
[8] Institute of Water Conservancy Works Design of Xuzhou,undefined
[9] Sichuan Institute of Geological Engineering Investigation Group Co. Ltd,undefined
[10] Xi’an University of Science and Technology,undefined
关键词
Alternating decision tree; Ensemble models; J48 decision tree; Landslide spatial prediction; Random forest;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Landslide susceptibility assessment has always been the focus of landslide spatial prediction research. In the present study, Muchuan County was selected as the study area, and four well-known machine learning models were adopted, namely, rotation forest (RF), J48 decision tree (J48), alternating decision tree (ADTree) and random forest (RaF). They and their ensembles (RF-J48, RF-ADTree and RF-RaF) were applied to landslide spatial prediction in Muchuan County. Eleven landslide conditioning factors, including plan curvature, profile curvature, slope angle, elevation, topographic wetness index, land use, normalized difference vegetation index, soil, lithology, distance to roads and distance to rivers, were established. In addition, 279 landslide datasets were compiled and randomly divided into 195 landslide training datasets and 84 landslide verification datasets. The contributions of the eleven conditioning factors were analyzed by J48, ADTree, and RaF models, respectively. The results show that lithology, slope angle, elevation, land use, soil, and distance to roads were the six principal landslide conditioning factors. Then, the Jenks natural break method was used to divide the landslide susceptibility maps into five grades. In addition, the accuracy of the above six models was verified by implementing the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The RF-RaF model achieved the best performance, and the rest were ranked as follows: RF-ADTree model, RaF model, RF-J48 model, ADTree model and J48 model. The results could provide scientific references for local natural resource departments.
引用
收藏
页码:11239 / 11254
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A novel evolutionary combination of artificial intelligence algorithm and machine learning for landslide susceptibility mapping in the west of Iran
    Yue Shen
    Atefeh Ahmadi Dehrashid
    Ramin Atash Bahar
    Hossein Moayedi
    Bahram Nasrollahizadeh
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 123527 - 123555
  • [32] Optimization of Computational Intelligence Models for Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation
    Zhao, Xia
    Chen, Wei
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (14)
  • [33] Landslide susceptibility mapping and model performance assessment
    Xiao, Chenchao
    Tian, Yuan
    Si, Kangping
    Li, Ting
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CIVIL AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2013, 353-356 : 3487 - +
  • [34] Modification of landslide susceptibility mapping using optimized PSO-ANN technique
    Moayedi, Hossein
    Mehrabi, Mohammad
    Mosallanezhad, Mansour
    Rashid, Ahmad Safuan A.
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    [J]. ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS, 2019, 35 (03) : 967 - 984
  • [35] Modification of landslide susceptibility mapping using optimized PSO-ANN technique
    Hossein Moayedi
    Mohammad Mehrabi
    Mansour Mosallanezhad
    Ahmad Safuan A. Rashid
    Biswajeet Pradhan
    [J]. Engineering with Computers, 2019, 35 : 967 - 984
  • [36] Landslide susceptibility mapping of Rangamati District of Bangladesh using statistical and machine intelligence model
    Bibi Hafsa
    Md. Sharafat Chowdhury
    Md. Naimur Rahman
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15 (15)
  • [37] Landslide susceptibility mapping using J48 Decision Tree with AdaBoost, Bagging and Rotation Forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China)
    Hong, Haoyuan
    Liu, Junzhi
    Dieu Tien Bui
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Acharya, Tri Dev
    Binh Thai Pham
    Zhu, A-Xing
    Chen, Wei
    Bin Ahmad, Baharin
    [J]. CATENA, 2018, 163 : 399 - 413
  • [38] Consideration of spatial heterogeneity in landslide susceptibility mapping using geographical random forest model
    Quevedo, Renata Pacheco
    Maciel, Daniel Andrade
    Uehara, Tatiana Dias Tardelli
    Vojtek, Matej
    Renno, Camilo Daleles
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Vojtekova, Jana
    Quoc Bao Pham
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (25) : 8190 - 8213
  • [39] Landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid random forest with GeoDetector and RFE for factor optimization
    Zhou, Xinzhi
    Wen, Haijia
    Zhang, Yalan
    Xu, Jiahui
    Zhang, Wengang
    [J]. GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS, 2021, 12 (05)
  • [40] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping of Chamoli (Uttarakhand) Using Random Forest Machine Learning Method
    Mittal, Amogh
    Gupta, Kunal
    Satyam, Neelima
    [J]. NATURAL GEO-DISASTERS AND RESILIENCY, CREST 2023, 2024, 445 : 207 - 217