Improving the performance of artificial intelligence models using the rotation forest technique for landslide susceptibility mapping

被引:0
|
作者
H. Shen
F. Huang
X. Fan
H. Shahabi
A. Shirzadi
D. Wang
C. Peng
X. Zhao
W. Chen
机构
[1] Shaanxi Nuclear Industry Engineering Survey Institute Co.,School of Civil Engineering and Architecture
[2] Ltd.,State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection
[3] Nanchang University,Department of Geomorphology, Faculty of Natural Resources
[4] Chengdu University of Technology,Department of Zrebar Lake Environmental Research, Kurdistan Studies Institute
[5] University of Kurdistan,Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources
[6] University of Kurdistan,College of Geology and Environment
[7] University of Kurdistan,undefined
[8] Institute of Water Conservancy Works Design of Xuzhou,undefined
[9] Sichuan Institute of Geological Engineering Investigation Group Co. Ltd,undefined
[10] Xi’an University of Science and Technology,undefined
关键词
Alternating decision tree; Ensemble models; J48 decision tree; Landslide spatial prediction; Random forest;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Landslide susceptibility assessment has always been the focus of landslide spatial prediction research. In the present study, Muchuan County was selected as the study area, and four well-known machine learning models were adopted, namely, rotation forest (RF), J48 decision tree (J48), alternating decision tree (ADTree) and random forest (RaF). They and their ensembles (RF-J48, RF-ADTree and RF-RaF) were applied to landslide spatial prediction in Muchuan County. Eleven landslide conditioning factors, including plan curvature, profile curvature, slope angle, elevation, topographic wetness index, land use, normalized difference vegetation index, soil, lithology, distance to roads and distance to rivers, were established. In addition, 279 landslide datasets were compiled and randomly divided into 195 landslide training datasets and 84 landslide verification datasets. The contributions of the eleven conditioning factors were analyzed by J48, ADTree, and RaF models, respectively. The results show that lithology, slope angle, elevation, land use, soil, and distance to roads were the six principal landslide conditioning factors. Then, the Jenks natural break method was used to divide the landslide susceptibility maps into five grades. In addition, the accuracy of the above six models was verified by implementing the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The RF-RaF model achieved the best performance, and the rest were ranked as follows: RF-ADTree model, RaF model, RF-J48 model, ADTree model and J48 model. The results could provide scientific references for local natural resource departments.
引用
收藏
页码:11239 / 11254
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Landslide susceptibility mapping using deep learning models in Ardabil province, Iran
    Hossein Hamedi
    Ali Asghar Alesheikh
    Mahdi Panahi
    Saro Lee
    [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2022, 36 : 4287 - 4310
  • [42] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Different GIS-Based Bivariate Models
    Nohani, Ebrahim
    Moharrami, Meisam
    Sharafi, Samira
    Khosravi, Khabat
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Binh Thai Pham
    Lee, Saro
    Melesse, Assefa M.
    [J]. WATER, 2019, 11 (07)
  • [43] GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models
    Amin Salehpour Jam
    Jamal Mosaffaie
    Faramarz Sarfaraz
    Samad Shadfar
    Rouhangiz Akhtari
    [J]. Natural Hazards, 2021, 108 : 1025 - 1046
  • [44] GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models
    Salehpour Jam, Amin
    Mosaffaie, Jamal
    Sarfaraz, Faramarz
    Shadfar, Samad
    Akhtari, Rouhangiz
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2021, 108 (01) : 1025 - 1046
  • [45] Landslide susceptibility mapping using deep learning models in Ardabil province, Iran
    Hamedi, Hossein
    Alesheikh, Ali Asghar
    Panahi, Mahdi
    Lee, Saro
    [J]. STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2022, 36 (12) : 4287 - 4310
  • [46] Quantitative Assessment of Landslide Risk Based on Susceptibility Mapping Using Random Forest and GeoDetector
    Wang, Yue
    Wen, Haijia
    Sun, Deliang
    Li, Yuechen
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (13)
  • [47] Assessment of alternative forest road routes and landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning
    Bugday, Ender
    Akay, Abdullah Emin
    [J]. CERNE, 2022, 28
  • [48] A Novel Performance Assessment Approach Using Photogrammetric Techniques for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Logistic Regression, ANN and Random Forest
    Sevgen, Eray
    Kocaman, Sultan
    Nefeslioglu, Hakan A.
    Gokceoglu, Candan
    [J]. SENSORS, 2019, 19 (18)
  • [49] Design and Development of an Intelligent Extension for Mapping Landslide Susceptibility Using Artificial Neural Network
    Vahidnia, Mohammad H.
    Alesheikh, Ali A.
    Alimohammadi, Abbas
    Hosseinali, Farhad
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2009, PT I, 2009, 5592 : 17 - 32
  • [50] AN INTERPRETATION STUDY ON THE ML MODELS FOR LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING
    Lv, Liang
    Chen, Tao
    Li, Jun
    [J]. IGARSS 2023 - 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2023, : 7241 - 7244