Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile

被引:0
|
作者
Matías Tagle
Francisca Rojas
Felipe Reyes
Yeanice Vásquez
Fredrik Hallgren
Jenny Lindén
Dimitar Kolev
Ågot K. Watne
Pedro Oyola
机构
[1] Antonio Bellet 292,Centro Mario Molina Chile
[2] Aschebergsgatan 44,IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute
[3] RISE Acreo,undefined
[4] Research Institutes of Sweden,undefined
[5] Environment Administration,undefined
[6] City of Gothenburg,undefined
来源
关键词
Citizen science; Reproducibility; Relative humidity; SDS011;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Integration of low-cost air quality sensors with the internet of things (IoT) has become a feasible approach towards the development of smart cities. Several studies have assessed the performance of low-cost air quality sensors by comparing their measurements with reference instruments. We examined the performance of a low-cost IoT particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) sensor in the urban environment of Santiago, Chile. The prototype was assembled from a PM10–PM2.5 sensor (SDS011), a temperature and relative humidity sensor (BME280) and an IoT board (ESP8266/Node MCU). Field tests were conducted at three regulatory monitoring stations during the 2018 austral winter and spring seasons. The sensors at each site were operated in parallel with continuous reference air quality monitors (BAM 1020 and TEOM 1400) and a filter-based sampler (Partisol 2000i). Variability between sensor units (n = 7) and the correlation between the sensor and reference instruments were examined. Moderate inter-unit variability was observed between sensors for PM2.5 (normalized root-mean-square error 9–24%) and PM10 (10–37%). The correlations between the 1-h average concentrations reported by the sensors and continuous monitors were higher for PM2.5 (R2 0.47–0.86) than PM10 (0.24–0.56). The correlations (R2) between the 24-h PM2.5 averages from the sensors and reference instruments were 0.63–0.87 for continuous monitoring and 0.69–0.93 for filter-based samplers. Correlation analysis revealed that sensors tended to overestimate PM concentrations in high relative humidity (RH > 75%) and underestimate when RH was below 50%. Overall, the prototype evaluated exhibited adequate performance and may be potentially suitable for monitoring daily PM2.5 averages after correcting for RH.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Long-term Field Evaluation of Low-cost Particulate Matter Sensors in Nanjing
    Bai, Lu
    Huang, Lin
    Wang, Zhenglu
    Ying, Qi
    Zheng, Jun
    Shi, Xiaowen
    Hu, Jianlin
    [J]. AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (02) : 242 - 253
  • [32] Field performance in agricultural settings of a wireless temperature monitoring system based on a low-cost infrared sensor
    Mahan, James R.
    Conaty, Warren
    Neilsen, James
    Payton, Paxton
    Cox, Stephen B.
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2010, 71 (02) : 176 - 181
  • [33] Using a Low-Cost Sensor to Estimate Fine Particulate Matter: A Case Study in Samutprakarn, Thailand
    Roddee, Supichaya
    Changphuek, Supachai
    Jirakajohnkool, Supet
    Tochaiyaphum, Panatda
    Phairuang, Worradorn
    Chetiyanukornkul, Thaneeya
    Boongla, Yaowatat
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2024, 15 (03)
  • [34] Calibration and Evaluation of a Low-Cost Optical Particulate Matter Sensor for Measurement of Lofted Lunar Dust
    Vidwans, Abhay
    Gillis-Davis, Jeffrey
    Biswas, Pratim
    [J]. IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2024, 24 (08) : 12472 - 12480
  • [35] Laboratory Evaluation of the Shinyei PPD42NS Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor
    Austin, Elena
    Novosselov, Igor
    Seto, Edmund
    Yost, Michael G.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (09):
  • [36] Field Test of Several Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors in High and Low Concentration Urban Environments
    Johnson, Karoline K.
    Bergin, Michael H.
    Russell, Armistead G.
    Hagler, Gayle S. W.
    [J]. AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2018, 18 (03) : 565 - 578
  • [37] Monitoring and apportioning sources of indoor air quality using low-cost particulate matter sensors
    Bousiotis, Dimitrios
    Alconcel, Leah-Nani S.
    Beddows, David C. S.
    Harrison, Roy M.
    Pope, Francis D.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 174
  • [38] Calibration methodology of low-cost sensors for high-quality monitoring of fine particulate matter
    Aix, Marie-Laure
    Schmitz, Sean
    Bicout, Dominique J.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 889
  • [39] Assessment of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor Systems against Optical and Gravimetric Methods in a Field Co-Location in Norway
    Vogt, Matthias
    Schneider, Philipp
    Castell, Nuria
    Hamer, Paul
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (08)
  • [40] A Low-Cost Sensor Network for Monitoring Peatland
    Mitchell, Hazel Louise
    Cox, Simon J.
    Lewis, Hugh G.
    [J]. Sensors, 2024, 24 (18)